War

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Dimko is putting an incorrect slant on it.
Admitting Ukraine to Nato while the war is hot would put Nato into shooting conflict with Russia. That would be seen as an existential threat to Russia and a nuclear-level provocation.
then we should just give them the longest range missiles we have for the HIMARS and other systems we've given them, and LOTS of them...then we just turn a blind eye to how the Ukrainians use them. maybe if they could DESTROY the kerch bridge...and maybe the Sviblovo rail yards, that just happen to be moscow adjacent, and every major rail yard between moscow and the Ukraine border...and the naval base in Sevastopol...then the fucking russians might realize they're fucked, and gtfo...
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
then we should just give them the longest range missiles we have for the HIMARS and other systems we've given them, and LOTS of them...then we just turn a blind eye to how the Ukrainians use them. maybe if they could DESTROY the kerch bridge...and maybe the Sviblovo rail yards, that just happen to be moscow adjacent, and every major rail yard between moscow and the Ukraine border...and the naval base in Sevastopol...then the fucking russians might realize they're fucked, and gtfo...
No.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Dimko is putting an incorrect slant on it.
Admitting Ukraine to Nato while the war is hot would put Nato into shooting conflict with Russia. That would be seen as an existential threat to Russia and a nuclear-level provocation.
That's obvious to those here, it was the not needing to join NATO part if they defeat the Russians and drive them out part I agree with and the fact Russia will be crippled for a decade or two, depending on the political situation.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
then we should just give them the longest range missiles we have for the HIMARS and other systems we've given them, and LOTS of them...then we just turn a blind eye to how the Ukrainians use them. maybe if they could DESTROY the kerch bridge...and maybe the Sviblovo rail yards, that just happen to be moscow adjacent, and every major rail yard between moscow and the Ukraine border...and the naval base in Sevastopol...then the fucking russians might realize they're fucked, and gtfo...
I'd agree for rail bridges around Ukraine's borders and power substations in Russia as retaliation for attacks on cities. One would end the war and the other would make the Russians share the pain and I think with EU support, Ukraine can repair more transformers than Russia can.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
That's obvious to those here, it was the not needing to join NATO part if they defeat the Russians and drive them out part I agree with and the fact Russia will be crippled for a decade or two, depending on the political situation.
It wasn’t obvious to me until I searched the stated premise. It’s the part with which you agree that I otoh find fallacious.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
It wasn’t obvious to me until I searched the stated premise. It’s the part with which you agree that I otoh find fallacious.
Nato is hard to get into when at peace. Russia will most likely have their military destroyed by this war and perhaps subsequent ones, they are having a hard time replacing loses in trained troops and equipment. What productive capacity they do have has been crippled by sanctions. The economy is in the process of self-destructing, they lost their NG and oil markets in Europe and military reform won't happen until political reform does. Looking ahead 5 years I can see Russia in the fucking dark ages and Ukraine prospering and militarily strong, having supplanted the Russians as energy suppliers.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Blinding the Russian drones means fewer artillary casualties and tactical surprise on the battlefield, they might even be effective against the Iranian drones too. A lot of companies from a lot of different countries are getting their equipment tested and evaluated in real world conditions.

The Iranian ones are suppose to have the GPS positions enter into them and then let fly. Might be a problem if they make Kiev a GPS free zone. If the drone gets close to a target and gets 'shot' down and explodes into an apartment block close by then there might be a lot of unhappy people.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Nato is hard to get into when at peace. Russia will most likely have their military destroyed by this war and perhaps subsequent ones, they are having a hard time replacing loses in trained troops and equipment. What productive capacity they do have has been crippled by sanctions. The economy is in the process of self-destructing, they lost their NG and oil markets in Europe and military reform won't happen until political reform does. Looking ahead 5 years I can see Russia in the fucking dark ages and Ukraine prospering and militarily strong, having supplanted the Russians as energy suppliers.
Even so, young Dimko is putting an unfair spin on it.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
The Iranian ones are suppose to have the GPS positions enter into them and then let fly. Might be a problem if they make Kiev a GPS free zone. If the drone gets close to a target and gets 'shot' down and explodes into an apartment block close by then there might be a lot of unhappy people.
Are we talking GPS or Glonass? If the latter, jam it. If the former, introduce a systematic error to requests from a certain box. This may be tough, since the sats put out a precise, not very directional time signal that the receiver processes. ~shrug~ might be doable, might not.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Are we talking GPS or Glonass? If the latter, jam it. If the former, introduce a systematic error to requests from a certain box. This may be tough, since the sats put out a precise, not very directional time signal that the receiver processes. ~shrug~ might be doable, might not.
It is said they are using GPS but not the advanced one used by Nato. That is why they get sort of close.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
"there’s no limit to Putin’s Trump's fear of defeat, his terror of having to acknowledge it, and his desire to avoid a public admission of incompetence. He has built his entire career and his personal image on the idea that his government business machinery is flawlessly effective."

I found this article interesting. Glad I found the site, seems add to what limited information we normally get out of Russia.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The Iranian ones are suppose to have the GPS positions enter into them and then let fly. Might be a problem if they make Kiev a GPS free zone. If the drone gets close to a target and gets 'shot' down and explodes into an apartment block close by then there might be a lot of unhappy people.
They need to have air defense outside the city and GPS can be jammed too, I think they will get most of the cheap drones soon and are at 85% now. They will only get better with more experience and redeploying defenses. Ballistic missiles are another issue and systems to deal with them are on the way, or I figure will be. Russia would have a harder time defending against attacks on power substations than Ukraine would and have a more difficult time replacing damaged equipment.
 
Top