thanks for the post but it leads me to even more questions... how to bring those raw npk number together with those ppm values. even if i convert the raw npk to elemental npk there is no connection... for example jacks 2-2-2 would be 2-1-2 elemental, but the ppms saying 1-1-2 ratio... what am i missing out??
Think that’s all grams. Jacks is 3-1-4 and you can see it mostly matches in the first columnthanks for the post but it leads me to even more questions... how to bring those raw npk number together with those ppm values. even if i convert the raw npk to elemental npk there is no connection... for example jacks 2-2-2 would be 2-1-2 elemental, but the ppms saying 1-1-2 ratio... what am i missing out??
You are bound by how the supplier mixes it. Jacks gives you good control over nitrogen because of the calcium nitrate. But you are still bound by the fact the base is 5 12 26.gotcha guys... those are recipes, my bad...
i am trying find the best ratio where quality hits the most... the most recommended or proven ratios mostly aiming for yield and are low on P heavy in K...
i could figure out some keypoints i really would like to try in my next cycle.
it is said npk 1-2-1 or 1-3-2 (after conversion to elemental npk very close to each other like 1-1-1) are hitting quality and yield and that the most of us lacking P and Ca and overfeeding wih K and Mg. also recommended Ca not lower than K and Mg 1/4 of N. I'd like to give it a try.
1-3-2 would hypothetically mean in ppm
N100
P131
K166
Ca175
Mg25
and 1-2-1 would be
N100
P87.2
K83
Ca90
Mg25
those are just ratios... concentration ist adjustable.
what are your thoughts on this?
Run your P at 131 and you'll get toxicity. You only need a little P. More N, and even more K. 1-1-2 and 2-1-3 are popular flower ratios.gotcha guys... those are recipes, my bad...
i am trying find the best ratio where quality hits the most... the most recommended or proven ratios mostly aiming for yield and are low on P heavy in K...
i could figure out some keypoints i really would like to try in my next cycle.
it is said npk 1-2-1 or 1-3-2 (after conversion to elemental npk very close to each other like 1-1-1) are hitting quality and yield and that the most of us lacking P and Ca and overfeeding wih K and Mg. also recommended Ca not lower than K and Mg 1/4 of N. I'd like to give it a try.
1-3-2 would hypothetically mean in ppm
N100
P131
K166
Ca175
Mg25
and 1-2-1 would be
N100
P87.2
K83
Ca90
Mg25
those are just ratios... concentration ist adjustable.
what are your thoughts on this?
You start with the lowest that goes into the others. 30-15-30 is the same as 2-1-2 (if that’s what you’re talking about lol)Jacks 5 12 26 plus calnit.
3G to 2g in 1gal.
I get 107N 41P 244K ppm.
That’s 1 to .3 to 2.2
It’s my understanding all fert manufacturers list P and K as percent P205 and K2O. Which you need to multiply by % factor to get real the percent.
Now are the 1-3-2 ratios the same percent actual%. I’m guessing so.
Yes but 15% of P2O5 is 6.45% phosphorous? Unless the companies are listing available Phosphorous. But the way I understand is it is p2o5 they are listing. Same for K its 83%You start with the lowest that goes into the others. 30-15-30 is the same as 2-1-2
Yeah I saw that the second time I read it lol. I haven’t seen many that actually matched up so idkYes but 15% of P2O5 is 6.45% phosphorous? Unless the companies are listing available Phosphorous. But the way I understand is it is p2o5 they are listing. Same for K its 83%
@TintEastwood made all those recipe npk charts doing the same thing. He would know about it haven’t seen him in a while thoughI’m messing with an excell spread sheet so I can understand what happens when you mix different or add other stuff. Just trying to wrap my noggin around it.