January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
right up until the equal and opposite reaction. In fact, I expect hypergolic responses after key players have received a specific impulse, once we are at that stage.
I would expect any republican to have a hypergolic response upon contact with the truth...
do you suppose that the DOJ is kind of waiting for this to happen first? And at this point, by DOJ i mean Jack Smith, Garland is off somewhere busily fretting and twiddling his thumbs.
I'd be curious to know if Smith and Willis have been in communication, sharing information? setting up a schedule for her, so that Smith can set his own schedule to begin when hers ends?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I would expect any republican to have a hypergolic response upon contact with the truth...
do you suppose that the DOJ is kind of waiting for this to happen first? And at this point, by DOJ i mean Jack Smith, Garland is off somewhere busily fretting and twiddling his thumbs.
I'd be curious to know if Smith and Willis have been in communication, sharing information? setting up a schedule for her, so that Smith can set his own schedule to begin when hers ends?
I don’t know. I don’t even have a guess of any value.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member

View attachment 5263100
"If she were to pursue charges, lawyers for several witnesses are preparing to move to quash indictments, based on the forewoman's comments, which they would argue taint any such charges and the investigation.."

What she said: “Can you imagine doing this for eight months and not coming out with a whole list” of recommended indictments, Emily Kohrs told CNN. “It’s not a short list. It’s not.”

She continued, “There may be some names on that list that you wouldn’t expect. But the big name that everyone keeps asking me about – I don’t think you will be shocked.”

Kohrs declined later Tuesday to disclose exactly how many indictments the special grand jury recommended be brought as part of the investigation, saying only that she believes it is more than 12.


1677099678584.png
CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman says it's inappropriate for Kohrs to have commented, but she believes it will make no legal difference, since Willis will make her own decision, and a new grand jury will be seated to issue any indictments.


 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
"If she were to pursue charges, lawyers for several witnesses are preparing to move to quash indictments, based on the forewoman's comments, which they would argue taint any such charges and the investigation.."

What she said: “Can you imagine doing this for eight months and not coming out with a whole list” of recommended indictments, Emily Kohrs told CNN. “It’s not a short list. It’s not.”

She continued, “There may be some names on that list that you wouldn’t expect. But the big name that everyone keeps asking me about – I don’t think you will be shocked.”

Kohrs declined later Tuesday to disclose exactly how many indictments the special grand jury recommended be brought as part of the investigation, saying only that she believes it is more than 12.


View attachment 5263125
CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman says it's inappropriate for Kohrs to have commented, but she believes it will make no legal difference, since Willis will make her own decision, and a new grand jury will be seated to issue any indictments.


love the image!
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
After watching what happened to Stewart Rhodes, the Proud Boys legal team decided that running out the clock is their only hope. The judge has expressed frustration but the Trump appointee seems to be bending over backward to allow the defense team to slow walk this trial.


The Jan. 6 trial of five members of the far-right Proud Boys group is proceeding at an excruciatingly slow pace in Washington, with a panel of defense attorneys engaged in heated bickering, firing off one objection after another, and clearly frustrating the presiding judge.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly paused proceedings Thursday morning after a juror failed to show up to court. It’s the second time in two weeks that the trial has stalled due to an absent juror.

In addition, Kelly has provided a notable amount of latitude for defense counsel to press objections and motions for mistrial. The judge has also often delayed ruling on procedural matters and openly wavered on some decisions.






1677620317911.png
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
After watching what happened to Stewart Rhodes, the Proud Boys legal team decided that running out the clock is their only hope. The judge has expressed frustration but the Trump appointee seems to be bending over backward to allow the defense team to slow walk this trial.


The Jan. 6 trial of five members of the far-right Proud Boys group is proceeding at an excruciatingly slow pace in Washington, with a panel of defense attorneys engaged in heated bickering, firing off one objection after another, and clearly frustrating the presiding judge.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly paused proceedings Thursday morning after a juror failed to show up to court. It’s the second time in two weeks that the trial has stalled due to an absent juror.

In addition, Kelly has provided a notable amount of latitude for defense counsel to press objections and motions for mistrial. The judge has also often delayed ruling on procedural matters and openly wavered on some decisions.






View attachment 5265328
This guy like Canon will stick out like a sore thumb and if the democrats can win a hat trick, he could be a candidate for impeachment, depending on his behavior, he can only slow things down so much and for so long. There will be atypical judges in this process, Trump sprinkled a lot of shit in the ice cream, but the DOJ can appeal to another level of justice as well as the defendants.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Do we have metric calendars up here or something? More like 100 days from Feb. 17 when that was posted. Around 90 now.

Days turn into weeks, how quick they pass.

:peace:
I once endeared a colleague for life by estimating five minutes before I was free to talk. Around minute twenty he complained.

I pointed out that I never said (and he didn’t think to ask) that (if) the minutes were consecutive.
 

shimbob

Well-Known Member

HGCC

Well-Known Member
i don't know why someone hasn't killed that cancerous growth on humanity yet...

100s of 1000s of psychotic assholes with personal arsenals...and not one of them has dealt with this pus filled boil on the asshole of America?
...its like the shitty psychos kind of line up behind one particular group/ideology.


Huh. What's that say about them.


I do/have actually wondered why it isn't more common for terminally ill people to not just say fuck it and decide to go after public figures. Guessing the whole dying thing gives some amount of perspective I don't have yet.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
"We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can't wait. I hate him passionately."

Fux Nooz viewers want lies, so they provide them. All hate, all the time.
Most are gonna get an unpleasant dose of reality as friends and relatives make sure they find out, Donald will keep their secret! :lol: Tucker hates his guts, but Donald won't mention that! This puts Trump and the magats in a corner and puts fox in a box. Tucker picked a bad time to have his J6 clown show with the tapes, both him and Kevin have shit on their faces along with Trump. I see Steve Bannon is crowing about it, even though it cuts his own throat. The magats and republicans are split and in trouble, fox is fucked and if the democrats win in 2024 they will use this and other shit to finish fox off and hopefully Jack will do the same to the magats in congress before the election along with Donald.
 
Top