2x4 tent , light upgrade.

MissinThe90’sStrains

Well-Known Member
Many 4x 2 tent owners bought 2 x xs1500 pro.
The combined wattage is more than the xs2500 pro. Really need a good vipar xs2500 pro deep review. I think it's a great light but i'm curious to read more about the lensing impact on hanging heights.
Mines is 10" above plants at 100% with no burn.
The 3 Hunza Valley 91 plants I posted several pics of on the Lucky Dog thread were grown under 2 Viparspectra xs 2500’s. I’ve got a cheap par meter I can take some readings with if you’d like.
 

laddyd

Well-Known Member
I ran two Viparspectra XS1500 lights in a 2x4 tent, a pro and a regular. They will give you wall to wall corner to corner coverage.
I had and continue to have a problem with heat. 300 watts sounds good on paper but that's a lot of heat being generated. I switched to a 6" fan and that seems to do the trick but still I just run the lights at 75%.
 

Delps8

Well-Known Member
Many 4x 2 tent owners bought 2 x xs1500 pro.
The combined wattage is more than the xs2500 pro. Really need a good vipar xs2500 pro deep review. I think it's a great light but i'm curious to read more about the lensing impact on hanging heights.
Mines is 10" above plants at 100% with no burn.
The Vipar site has had problems with their product listing pages for the 1500 and the 2500 for months which is pretty sad. I can't find a link to it but you can get to the product page by using the search feature. The link is here.

This is their PPFD map. The PPFD map from Amazon is shown below and they're different. Apparently, their product engineering people do a much better job than their software engineering people (I'm a software engineer).

If you're running 100% at 10", that's right at 900µmol. Congrats - many growers won't go near the light level. You should be getting excellent results.
1725466736017.png
From the Amazon product listing:

1725466507253.png
 

Delps8

Well-Known Member
I ran two Viparspectra XS1500 lights in a 2x4 tent, a pro and a regular. They will give you wall to wall corner to corner coverage.
I had and continue to have a problem with heat. 300 watts sounds good on paper but that's a lot of heat being generated. I switched to a 6" fan and that seems to do the trick but still I just run the lights at 75%.
And it's a board light with an on board driver (so it's going to be warmer than a bar light with a dismountable driver).
 
Last edited:

pegboy

Well-Known Member
Just noticed Spider Farmer has a redesigned G4500 that looks pretty nice and the price is right. 320W.


EDIT: this one too.

 

Delps8

Well-Known Member
Just noticed Spider Farmer has a redesigned G4500 that looks pretty nice and the price is right. 320W.


EDIT: this one too.

Grrrr…

You got one of the good ones. The new 4500's use a 320 watt driver vs 430 and PPFD is far lower than your light. On the positive side, the spectrum has a lot more red in it but, overall, it's a step down for a lot of some growers.

The V1 4500 was a PPFD monster. I'm looking to replace my Growcraft flower light because it's a 2020 design and has some light falloff at the edges.

The issue that I'm looking to deal with is to be able to put 1kµmol on the canopy with temps at the flower tops <78°.


1725499548426.png


The 4500 could hit those numbers.

Check out the 16" values. My thinking was that I could raise the 4500 (SE or G) to 18" or higher and hit my temperature mark.

Why <78°?

As Mitch Westmoreland discovered and as he shared in his YouTube videos, cannabanoid levels plummet when flower tops are >78°. (Westmoreland is a PhD student and now candidate under Bugbee).

1725499623584.png

The V1 4500 is far more powerful than any other 2' x 4' light and they did it by shoehorning in a 430 watt driver, which is what they were using for one of their 4' lights.

A week ago, they introduce the new "gelded" model. (Well, they didn't call it "gelded", I might have slipped that in.)

It's the same price, more red in the spectrum and the 320 watt driver puts out enough light to make it just another light.

1725499888113.png


My business owner + cannabis grower brain figures that they were getting call from growers who were damaging their plants + the cost of the 420 watt driver + very few people will actually use all of that light so they came out with a product that will still sell but will be cheaper to produce and growers who think that 100% at 12" hang height is a good idea won't be able to fry their plants. All of those are rational reasons but I got left with my d*ck in my ear.

The new light is a decent light and I like the spectrum more than the spectrum on the Mars 320 (300?) watt model but the V1 4500's, the one that you have, is the cat's meow.
 
The Vipar site has had problems with their product listing pages for the 1500 and the 2500 for months which is pretty sad. I can't find a link to it but you can get to the product page by using the search feature. The link is here.

This is their PPFD map. The PPFD map from Amazon is shown below and they're different. Apparently, their product engineering people do a much better job than their software engineering people (I'm a software engineer).

If you're running 100% at 10", that's right at 900µmol. Congrats - many growers won't go near the light level. You should be getting excellent results.
View attachment 5422766
From the Amazon product listing:

View attachment 5422765
Good post. I was v nervous about frying my plants and v gradually increased the power on my xs2500pro.
Can't believe they're posting 2 different par maps. That's confusing as hell.
Bottom line is i'm now more sceptical than ever about broscience 420 forum posts.
I have a few wks till finish and it's a nervey time.
"Just dont F it up" mantra.
Looking forward to being able to put a proper evidenced report on the xs2500pro.
Thanks
HH
 

MissinThe90’sStrains

Well-Known Member
I’ve completed 2 grows with them so far, and like them enough to keep going. Ive got some older spider farmer panels too, and they seem to have a bit more red in them (visually), but both perform well. The Viparspectra is a bit stronger than my SF 2000 and has better coverage (bigger light). It seems to be stronger on the “sides and ends” than the SF. Dimmers work, and the non-attached ballasts are nice to be able to hang outside of tent to help with heat.
 

Delps8

Well-Known Member
Good post. I was v nervous about frying my plants and v gradually increased the power on my xs2500pro.
Can't believe they're posting 2 different par maps. That's confusing as hell.
Bottom line is i'm now more sceptical than ever about broscience 420 forum posts.
I have a few wks till finish and it's a nervey time.
"Just dont F it up" mantra.
Looking forward to being able to put a proper evidenced report on the xs2500pro.
Thanks
HH
I'm skeptical, by nature, but you're taking it to another level.

"Good post. I was v nervous about frying my plants and v gradually increased the power on my xs2500pro.
It's very hard to damage a plant using an LED grow light. It takes "a high level of unfamiliarity", to be kind, or negligence. HPS lights generate a lot of heat and, if a grower wasn't attentive, the heat could rapidly cause tissue death. In contrast, an LED produces very little heat. A typical description is that they're "warm to the touch". I've seen pictures of plants touching LED bars and there's no tissue damage.

What about harm to the plant caused by excess light? Not easy to do, ref. my comment above. I had a dimmer fail in a 330 watt light. The plant was at 1100±µmol and the dimmer went out, so the plant was at 1350 or so. The only way I caught it is that the temperature reading on the AC Infinity Controller 69 went up and I happened to see it. When I walked into the garage, I could see the blaze of light. Fortunately, I had a spare dimmer so I swapped in the good dimmer. The plant had done what was completely normal when a cannabis plant gets excess light - it reduced the surface area exposed to the light by "canoeing". After turning the light down, the leaves started "unfolding" and were at their normal shape with in an hour of so.

I grow in high light conditions and I'd have to say that I probably turn it up too fast every other grow or so. No big deal. When the plant reacts, either by canoeing/tacoing or rotating the leave toward the vertical, as if it were a Venetian blind, you just turn the light down a bit/raise the light an inch.

The worst I've ever done was to bend a cola. The cola bent at a slight angle and stayed that way when I turned the light down.

Growers lose more yield by not turning their light up high enough than the do by turning up their lights too high. Per the paper, "Frontiers in Plant Science - Yield, Potency, and Photosynthesis in Increasing Light Levels", crop yield increase about 4% for each 50µmol of PPFD.

If your grow isn't in the 900-1000µmol region, which is a light level where cannabis thrives in ambient CO2, you can calculate the amount of your crop that you're not getting.

1725564794052.png

"Can't believe they're posting 2 different par maps. That's confusing as hell."
Those PPFD maps are different because those are different lights. The new model has a lower PPFD, just like I explained in the text. And there are valid reasons for Vipar to make the change, just like I explained in the text.

"Bottom line is i'm now more sceptical than ever about broscience 420 forum posts."
I don't know why you say that but, if there are things you don't understand, ask away. There's a lot of expertise on RIU.

"I have a few wks till finish and it's a nervey time."
No need to be nervous but each to their own. One thing that I got a kick out of when I joined RIU was the acronym "LTFA". If conditions in your grow are decent, you'll get a good crop.

"Looking forward to being able to put a proper evidenced report on the xs2500pro."
You've said similar things in other postings and I'm not sure what you want. A grow light has a limited number of characteristics and the marketing literature covers the big pieces. The 2500 has a blue heavy spectrum so it will tend to grow plants that are compact and bushy. It has a good PPFD map so the light can generate a pretty high yield. The driver isn't dismountable and it's a board light so it's going to heat the grow area a little more than a bar style light with a dismountable driver.

Since you're already using the light, what are you expecting or hoping to learn from a review?
 

joesoap2013

Well-Known Member
The older g4500 was half a g8600 basically
I rememeber it at Christmas it was really cheap I was gonna buy 1 then buy another in a month or 2 that was my thinking
They upped the price of it big time bout 2 weeks later
 

Delps8

Well-Known Member
The older g4500 was half a g8600 basically
I rememeber it at Christmas it was really cheap I was gonna buy 1 then buy another in a month or 2 that was my thinking
They upped the price of it big time bout 2 weeks later
OK, got it. I knew that high watt driver had come from a big light. Thanks for that piece of the puzzle!
 

joesoap2013

Well-Known Member
I dont know abouScreenshot_20240906_204522_Chrome.jpgt the drivers
Must have been stoned the time I checked them light numbers
Somehow I had that in my head
Couldn't a been but lol
There's the g8600
 

Delps8

Well-Known Member
I dont know abou
Must have been stoned the time I checked them light numbers
Somehow I had that in my head
Couldn't a been but lol
There's the g8600
That's really impressive. The PPFD values are very high but they're also incredibly uniform, even at 10". And it gets better as hang height increases.
 
Top