What's the biggest mistake Bush made?

medicineman

New Member
There you go again, This country is not a dictatorship..The pres is not in the position to do any of what you claim..The congress and the House also have a say, remember civics class, or gov't class, apparently not.
Clinton gutted the intel services and vetoed the elimination of Bin Laden..for which he DID have the control, so Clinton bears a lot of the resposibilty for (11 He got caught with his pecker out and when asked if he'd had sex with ML he first asked what the definition of "is" is.. then when asked again if he'd had sex with her..attempted to redefine the term "sex". Oh, he TRIED to redefine the Constitution as well, claiming that supposed "assualt weapons:ie civilian versions of mil weapons were more powerful than other rifles of the same caliber..Also intimated that the average citizen is too dumb to handle firearms, and besides, why do civs need guns when LEO does such a wonderful job..
Clinton deregulated the banking industry and forced them to lower their lending standards which has led to the shit storm we find ourselves in. Now Obama has appointed an avowed Socialist to a non conformation post over all things "green" and climatic. Carol B has stated that what is neede is a "world Gov't" where the countries (us) who DO more will give away all that isn't "needed" Now, who is to decide that? Also, she wants to regulate every aspect of manufacturing with an eye to totally eliminate green house gases. While i agree that GHG need to be brought way down, with her idealistic approach the job loss rate will quadruple as companies move to places where there are NO GHG laws.How will that help us.. Oh, by the way, what have the dems done in the last 2 years< When the "promisec" big changes now that they had the majority? Squat is what they've done.

Also, what unilateral powers does the Pres have? Since you "know" that all those rep were to blame, what could any of them done on their own ?

It also took Reagan to get the hostages back from Iran, By your attitude, you'd have left them there right. Carter could have gottenthem back, but he chickened out. None of them would have been taken , if Carter had had the balls to allow the Marine guards to do their jobs and protect US soil. He gave those people away..Reagan got them back..But I suppose to socialist a few lives don't matter.
Well, I can see your mind is made up, locked tight and the key is thrown away.
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
FYI, it is difficult to take anyone seriously when they subscribe to ridiculous conspiracy theories claiming false flag operations. Bolding selected words/terms in every one of your posts does not help your case either, the emphases appear arbitrary and make you look unstable.
FYI ... only those with their head in the sand think 911 is a "ridiculous conspiracy theories" with all the blatant inconsistencies .. the cover-up ... no heads rolling it's not a claim... it was a false flag operation:evil: ... with plenty of evidence to support it ... doesn't matter that you are too blind or too stupid to see ... it still happen ... only people in the US fixed on the corporate media rhetoric that have been programed to disregard the truth under "conspiracy theories" think it's ridiculous ... Heads of states, MPs in different governments and scientific communities don't subscribe to conspiracy theories ... they follow the trial ... and it led them to confirming 911 was and inside job ...
... and I beg to differ ... my boldness is an asset ... I have to emphasize certain words and phases to push through all of that mush in those bushwhacked minds ... and I can easy refer to the post when their dilutions cause them to make shit up ... besides ... it's only those that support war crimes with their heads in the sand ... think of it as being unstable ... no surprises there ...kiss-ass
 

bradlyallen2

Well-Known Member
FYI ... only those with their head in the sand think 911 is a "ridiculous conspiracy theories" with all the blatant inconsistencies .. the cover-up ... no heads rolling it's not a claim... it was a false flag operation:evil: ... with plenty of evidence to support it ... doesn't matter that you are too blind or too stupid to see ... it still happen ... only people in the US fixed on the corporate media rhetoric that have been programed to disregard the truth under "conspiracy theories" think it's ridiculous ... Heads of states, MPs in different governments and scientific communities don't subscribe to conspiracy theories ... they follow the trial ... and it led them to confirming 911 was and inside job ...
... and I beg to differ ... my boldness is an asset ... I have to emphasize certain words and phases to push through all of that mush in those bushwhacked minds ... and I can easy refer to the post when their dilutions cause them to make shit up ... besides ... it's only those that support war crimes with their heads in the sand ... think of it as being unstable ... no surprises there ...kiss-ass
If you are succint in your posts bold type is less of a necessity. :hump:
 

bradlyallen2

Well-Known Member
:lol: ... That was tongue-in-cheek, right? I mean, so far ... people HAVE stopped trying to crash planes into our buildings, and as far as I know, there hasn't been any Anthrax attacks at all.

Thank you President Bush for hanging tough and not giving a shit about popularity polls. You are a true patriot, sir!

Vi
If by "patriot" you mean person who breaks international laws as established by the Geneva Conventions and also has no regard for the constitution here at home then yes, he is the most "patriotic" president we have ever had.
 

medicineman

New Member
If by "patriot" you mean person who breaks international laws as established by the Geneva Conventions and also has no regard for the constitution here at home then yes, he is the most "patriotic" president we have ever had.
Bradley, Vi is another cast in the die nutjob that believes the libertarian mantra bullshit. That belief has never worked and never will. People are way too greedy to ever have a society that free. I believe that those societies similar to libertarians were in the past only for the nobility, and we can all see that Vi is not noble in the least.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Bradley, Vi is another cast in the die nutjob that believes the libertarian mantra bullshit. That belief has never worked and never will. People are way too greedy to ever have a society that free. I believe that those societies similar to libertarians were in the past only for the nobility, and we can all see that Vi is not noble in the least.
Which is why the vast majority of our problems have come about as a result of a big government, nanny-state?

Trade Deficits - Caused by Government Interference in the Markets
National Deficits - Caused by Government not being able to run a balanced budget due to the push of Fascists/Socialist Nanny-Staters for more and larger government programs.
National Debt - Caused by the Above
Great Depression - Caused by Government Created Central Bank
Current Crisis - Caused by Government Created Central Bank, and other banks not utilizing money given to them by the government to ease the credit markets (instead of being allowed to fail, because they were "too big to fail.")

Government has consistently proven that it only knows how to make situations worse.

Add onto the fact that a corporation has no absolute power over any one.

If you don't like their products you don't have to buy them.

Don't like Ford/GM/Chrysler, buy another Car
Don't like Cars, buy a Bicycle
Don't like McDonalds, eat somewhere else, or buy fresh & raw ingredients to make your own.
Don't like your employer, find a new one

OMG... such a difficult concept...

I don't know why I bother though. It's clear that some people here can see the symptoms, and insist on coming up with a solution to those instead of going to the underlying cause and resolving that.

It's like California, where seeing the budget deficits the government cuts income tax rebates and raises taxes, not thinking that the problem is caused by high taxes driving business away, thus reducing revenue, and thus leading a rational, intelligent person to understand that the solution would be to lower taxes to attract more businesses, and thus increase revenues.

Oh wait, I forgot, Businesses are evil, so the last thing Kommiefornia wants to do is attract more of them. Better that everyone be starving and broke than actually working for a Corporation...:roll:
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
I take it you mean succinct? ... Not on this forum ... not with a group of people with no reading comprehension ...:-|
If you knew what he meant, why correct him? I'm sure you meant 'delusions' not 'dilutions' in your last post too.
IMO, the emphasis makes it harder for people with poor reading comprehension due to the way the eye shifts when reading normal text compared to reading text broken up that way. There's also the matter of the internal voice that readers generally hear. If someone were to speak in the manner in which you are writing it would sound unnatural.
Writers, print and website designers know this very well, which is why you will see only limited use of emphasis, and usually consisting of italicized text not bolded.
Okay, so this is OT, but since my head is in the sand, I will leave you all to your inane rantings.
 

4eftelover

Active Member
Its not what bush has done its why did the idiots vote him in for another 4 years.How quick people are to blame someone else.If the idiots did not vote him in office again a bunch of the crap would have never happen.so all you people who voted him in office,this is on your table.After the first 4 years the people should have known better.

very very true. after all, it was clear to see after the first 4 years that he was an idiot, but some dumb fucks voted him back in. i couldnt believe it
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
:lol: ... That was tongue-in-cheek, right? I mean, so far ... people HAVE stopped trying to crash planes into our buildings, and as far as I know, there hasn't been any Anthrax attacks at all.

Thank you President Bush for hanging tough and not giving a shit about popularity polls. You are a true patriot, sir!

Vi
Now all we have to do is remain the middle east permanently and we'll be safe forever! not.
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
very very true. after all, it was clear to see after the first 4 years that he was an idiot, but some dumb fucks voted him back in. i couldnt believe it
You have to admit though, offering up Kerry as his opposition wasn't the best strategy the dems have come up with. As is typical of American elections, the best person available to topple Bush didn't even make it past the primaries.
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
If you knew what he meant, why correct him? I'm sure you meant 'delusions' not 'dilutions' in your last post too.
IMO, the emphasis makes it harder for people with poor reading comprehension due to the way the eye shifts when reading normal text compared to reading text broken up that way. There's also the matter of the internal voice that readers generally hear. If someone were to speak in the manner in which you are writing it would sound unnatural.
Writers, print and website designers know this very well, which is why you will see only limited use of emphasis, and usually consisting of italicized text not bolded.
Okay, so this is OT, but since my head is in the sand, I will leave you all to your inane rantings.
When did I correct him? ... that something you came up with in your delusional mind ... happy? ... oh so now we have to use proper gamma and sentence structure if we write? .... get bend! ....

yeah right "inane rantings" ... yet I don't see you proving my rantings wrong ... why? ... because you can't!:hump:


You're no match for me ... might as well run along and play with the other children ... perhaps they will be impressed by your proper writings ... :spew:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
very very true. after all, it was clear to see after the first 4 years that he was an idiot, but some dumb fucks voted him back in. i couldnt believe it
the illegitimate bush was never elected by the people ... the office was stolen in 2000 through vote suppression and rigged voting machines ... and the same happen in 2004 ... only it was more widespread than 2000 ... that is fact.
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
When did I correct him? ... that something you came up with in your delusional mind ...
WTF? are you claiming you didn't correct his spelling of succinct?

As for 'proving' your rantings wrong, they have been debunked many times by many people and I feel no compulsion to turn this thread into a 9/11 conspiracy thread. Besides, IME, debating conspiracy theorists is a losing proposition because any real evidence generally gets discounted as propaganda and part of the conspiracy itself. CT are self-perpetuating, as experts speak up to denounce outrageous claims, they then become a pawn of the cabal running the thing.
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
WTF? are you claiming you didn't correct his spelling of succinct?
That's pretty obvious ... next bullshit response/question ...

As for 'proving' your rantings wrong, they have been debunked many times by many people
Oh have they now? ... well if that's the case I'm sure you will have no problem providing links to these debunking ... will you? I look forward to seeing them... I'm sure you will conveniently claim you don't have the time or something to that effect ... I know you won't be able to do it ... :lol:

and I feel no compulsion to turn this thread into a 9/11 conspiracy thread.
Especially since you will lose big time ... so it is wise for you to cover your lack of disputing evidence ...


Besides, IME, debating conspiracy theorists is a losing proposition because any real evidence generally gets discounted as propaganda and part of the conspiracy itself.
Not if it makes sense or answers questions ...

CT are self-perpetuating, as experts speak up to denounce outrageous claims, they then become a pawn of the cabal running the thing.
Those "outrageous claims" you've been parroted to say are blatant inconsistency that you or the government can't explain away ... I have recorded plenty of evidence from difference sources ... also experts ... along with others that has yet to be disputed

... people who disregard the truth and label obvious inconsistency as CT are really fuck in the head ... don't you think?:dunce::sleep:
 

Anotheroldephart

Well-Known Member
If you knew what he meant, why correct him? I'm sure you meant 'delusions' not 'dilutions' in your last post too.
IMO, the emphasis makes it harder for people with poor reading comprehension due to the way the eye shifts when reading normal text compared to reading text broken up that way. There's also the matter of the internal voice that readers generally hear. If someone were to speak in the manner in which you are writing it would sound unnatural.
Writers, print and website designers know this very well, which is why you will see only limited use of emphasis, and usually consisting of italicized text not bolded.
Okay, so this is OT, but since my head is in the sand, I will leave you all to your inane rantings.
Or it could be uttered by the uinformed, other than by those talking heads on the tube, or didn't live through those periods of which he speaks.*g*
 

Anotheroldephart

Well-Known Member
You have to admit though, offering up Kerry as his opposition wasn't the best strategy the dems have come up with. As is typical of American elections, the best person available to topple Bush didn't even make it past the primaries.
Yeah...and now we're STILL stuck with him!!!
 

CrackerJax

New Member
I'm sure one could find fraud in every national election ever held. The last election proved it continues onward and upward. It's only when it is close that people get upset.

Obama only won by 7%, hardly a landslide and most certainly not a mandate for anything. Now if the election results came in at 1 or 2 % difference between them, voter fraud would become exposed and emotions would flare up.

But it didn't come in at 1 or 2 %, so the examination NEVER takes place. Doesn't mean there wasn't rampant fraud. You think Illinois has EVER had a clean election? :mrgreen: get real...... get over it.



out. :blsmoke:
 
Top