CrackerJax
New Member
So coding is a time saver for me.....I know it's drivel. shhh....you're giving away all of the secrets!
...llew sa skorw sdrawkcab gnipyt dnif I
out.
...llew sa skorw sdrawkcab gnipyt dnif I
out.
[/quote,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1st if ur trying to pick a fight and be civil while doing it ,,,,,,,,,,,u need to practice,,,,,,,come on over to the koolaid party ,,,,,,,and ur woman likes my dick ,,she says she won't b able to have sex for a month cause it will fall out ,,,,,,,,,,thats why she won't put out,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and fuck you to i won't hide behind a icon
crazy jack ,,,,,,,,,,there r no secrets ,,,,,,,,,,,jack i accually do agree w/ u often but till u publicly apologize for what u said about my cuz,,,,,,,,,,,,he re-uped after 911,,,,,,,,,,,and always thought the iraq war was going to send him to hell and the day that IED went off ,,,,,,,,,,bush the deserter murdered one of the best men to ever walked the earth ,,,,,,,,,,,and as he layed on the ground body parts everywhere ,,,,,,,,,,heart still beating brain still working ,,,,,,,,,,,,, sure he was going to hell,,,,,,,,,,,the price u chicken hawks have paid is not enough i have no sympathy for a man that suports war but don't go ,.,,,,to old ,,ciminal record ,,,,,,,,,,,kbr will take u ,,,,,,,,,,it's not to lateSo coding is a time saver for me.....I know it's drivel. shhh....you're giving away all of the secrets!
...llew sa skorw sdrawkcab gnipyt dnif I
out.
please tell me english is not your first language. ANd whats with all the ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,? You mean ...crazy jack ,,,,,,,,,,there r no secrets ,,,,,,,,,,,jack i accually do agree w/ u often but till u publicly apologize for what u said about my cuz,,,,,,,,,,,,he re-uped after 911,,,,,,,,,,,and always thought the iraq war was going to send him to hell and the day that IED went off ,,,,,,,,,,bush the deserter murdered one of the best men to ever walked the earth ,,,,,,,,,,,and as he layed on the ground body parts everywhere ,,,,,,,,,,heart still beating brain still working ,,,,,,,,,,,,, sure he was going to hell,,,,,,,,,,,the price u chicken hawks have paid is not enough i have no sympathy for a man that suports war but don't go ,.,,,,to old ,,ciminal record ,,,,,,,,,,,kbr will take u ,,,,,,,,,,it's not to late
He's pretty far out thereit makes me think him and Maxthc are the same person. Go read one of max's frothing rabid posts and compare.
Can anybody else read this? If so why did you waste your time trying so hard? Is your space bar broken bro?crazy jack ,,,,,,,,,,there r no secrets ,,,,,,,,,,,jack i accually do agree w/ u often but till u publicly apologize for what u said about my cuz,,,,,,,,,,,,he re-uped after 911,,,,,,,,,,,and always thought the iraq war was going to send him to hell and the day that IED went off ,,,,,,,,,,bush the deserter murdered one of the best men to ever walked the earth ,,,,,,,,,,,and as he layed on the ground body parts everywhere ,,,,,,,,,,heart still beating brain still working ,,,,,,,,,,,,, sure he was going to hell,,,,,,,,,,,the price u chicken hawks have paid is not enough i have no sympathy for a man that suports war but don't go ,.,,,,to old ,,ciminal record ,,,,,,,,,,,kbr will take u ,,,,,,,,,,it's not to late
The problem with that is that it does not fit the definition of life.These chains of metal particles look so much like real, living animals, it is hard not to think of them as alive. (See exclusive video below.) But they are actually bits of metal that came together under the influence of a specially tuned magnetic field.
The problem with that is that it does not fit the definition of life.
Conventional definition: The consensus is that life is a characteristic of organisms that exhibit all or most of the following phenomena:[9][10]
NOPE
- Homeostasis: Regulation of the internal environment to maintain a constant state; for example, electrolyte concentration or sweating to reduce temperature.
NOPE
- Organization: Being structurally composed of one or more cells, which are the basic units of life.
NOPE
- Metabolism: Consumption of energy by converting chemicals and energy into cellular components (anabolism) and decomposing organic matter (catabolism). Living things require energy to maintain internal organization (homeostasis) and to produce the other phenomena associated with life.
DEBATABLE
- Growth: Maintenance of a higher rate of synthesis than catabolism. A growing organism increases in size in all of its parts, rather than simply accumulating matter. The particular species begins to multiply and expand as the evolution continues to flourish.
NOPE
- Adaptation: The ability to change over a period of time in response to the environment. This ability is fundamental to the process of evolution and is determined by the organism's heredity as well as the composition of metabolized substances, and external factors present.
PROBABLY NOT
- Response to stimuli: A response can take many forms, from the contraction of a unicellular organism to external chemicals, to complex reactions involving all the senses of higher animals. A response is often expressed by motion, for example, the leaves of a plant turning toward the sun (phototropism) and chemotaxis.
NOPE
- Reproduction: The ability to produce new organisms. Reproduction can be the division of one cell to form two new cells. Usually the term is applied to the production of a new individual (either asexually, from a single parent organism, or sexually, from at least two differing parent organisms), although strictly speaking it also describes the production of new cells in the process of growth.
RESULTS - NOT ALIVE... TOO DAMN BAD
Defensive much?The problem with that is that it does not fit the definition of life.
I read the entire thing, but if you're going to attack some one for taking it out of context, perhaps you'll attack Stony for taking it totally out of context and trying to apply it to the arguments of ID vs Creationism.Defensive much?
Did you even read the whole article or did you just go through it searching for something to quote out of context?
"We still don't know what physics is appropriate for biology. This is a wonderful intermediate,"
"This is physics for the fun of physics."
No one even attempted to claim this was life. The most they said is this may model certain things in biological systems. Seems the scientists are less apt to jump to conclusions than the people that seem to oppose them.
I read the entire thing, but if you're going to attack some one for taking it out of context, perhaps you'll attack Stony for taking it totally out of context and trying to apply it to the arguments of ID vs Creationism.
Nice false dichotomy you present.I read the entire thing, but if you're going to attack some one for taking it out of context, perhaps you'll attack Stony for taking it totally out of context and trying to apply it to the arguments of ID vs Creationism.
No, I agree with a lot of people, just not 100%.I don't think it is possible for Brutal to agree with anyone . . . .