Friend is joinin the DEA...

poplars

Well-Known Member
pharmaceutics can't get into weed. it's a natural substance therefore it cannot be patented. too much complexity to it I suppose. it's a good thing though.

it just needs to be regulated, that's all. everything needs to be regulated, take the power away from the cartels and dealers and into the hands of working-class citizens . . .
 

miccyj

Well-Known Member
Even if big companys started selling weed, if they did jack up the price, more people would just grow their own, seeing as it wouldn't be illegal anymore.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Well, if it was legalized for sale in say liquor stores and such, I'm sure they would make growing illegal still, otherwise nobody would buy product.

out. :blsmoke:
 

miccyj

Well-Known Member
But it's legal to brew your own alcohol for personnel use............. Well, it is in australia, I'm not sure about the US.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Yes, it's legal here too, but like weed, but there is a difference. there hasn't ever been a big Home brew movement since prohibition. We already have many many thousands of home growers for weed which could harm the legal market. I think they would (and maybe should) tackle it from a health standard issue. What are you buying off of the street? Who made it and how was it made? How safe is it... seriously, how safe is one guys weed over another... I've seen some crazy stuff posted on these forums....people who sell too. Legalization would bring standardization...not in strain so much but in health standards...not a bad thing. :peace:

Perhaps if the person who grew it smoked it personally, but then how would anyone know? it would bring the police back into the picture... a no go in my book.

out. :blsmoke:
 

\|/Joker420\|/

Well-Known Member
Even if big companys started selling weed, if they did jack up the price, more people would just grow their own, seeing as it wouldn't be illegal anymore.
i doubt that...just b/c...well people are lazy, they would see paying a higher price "ok" b/c it would save them the hassle
not every one just most.
thats my opinion tho
:blsmoke:
 

letsdothis21

Well-Known Member
Tell him he shouldn't join the DEA because that shit is a useless waste of his time, and that he is a sellout.

Thanks
-America
 

JoeBananas

Well-Known Member
There is us and there is them. You do you work with/for?

That is the major question involved. But what I wanna know is if he would throw you to the wolves to save his job? Its like being a storm trooper working for Vader.

Just doing the job right?

I would tell my friend that he need to make a choice about his life and its purpose. I want an inside guy that will leak info and let drug sellers out the back door in escape from the fascist oppressors

If he fell to the dark side I would just have to chop off his head an bury him in the desert somewhere.....

But then again I wouldnt be friends with a cop in the first place. They choose to be pigs and are brainwashed and not to be trusted.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Well he stated the guy was already a cop so... if they are friends...what would change? Friends don't make demands of their buddies...

out. :blsmoke:
 

\|/Joker420\|/

Well-Known Member
There is us and there is them. You do you work with/for?

That is the major question involved. But what I wanna know is if he would throw you to the wolves to save his job? Its like being a storm trooper working for Vader.

Just doing the job right?

I would tell my friend that he need to make a choice about his life and its purpose. I want an inside guy that will leak info and let drug sellers out the back door in escape from the fascist oppressors

If he fell to the dark side I would just have to chop off his head an bury him in the desert somewhere.....

But then again I wouldnt be friends with a cop in the first place. They choose to be pigs and are brainwashed and not to be trusted.
well to each his own...
considering my dad was a cop it dosent really bother me, i may not agree with some actions of the police and i may not agree with some laws...but that dosent mean im gonna black list every cop i know... and the friend in question, and my father have been there for me longer than there job and my love for marijuana was ever a factor, i try to have an open mind to all

peace
 

juststartin

Well-Known Member
well to each his own...
considering my dad was a cop it dosent really bother me, i may not agree with some actions of the police and i may not agree with some laws...but that dosent mean im gonna black list every cop i know... and the friend in question, and my father have been there for me longer than there job and my love for marijuana was ever a factor, i try to have an open mind to all

peace
An inteligent point. Most people think that they are solid enimies with the police because they grow/smoke weed when about 90% have never even had an encounter with the old bill but still think they are at war.

Fact of the matter is law isnt just about growing bud and without the police our world would be fucked up
 

Psychedelics and Chronic

Well-Known Member
i somewhat agree... i dont think the DEA should be involved with marijuana related issues...but in some countries(even our own) where drugs like cocaine and heroin are a big problem, and cause violence, then thats where they should be utilized
What if it's the laws that are causing the violence, not the drugs. Prohibition of any drug causes more people to use and abuse them. Not to mention, if they were sold in stores, and regulated, they could be sold for cheaper and the violence associated with them would be much less as you dont have to worry about violent people getting rich off of them or robbing/killing another dealer. Also, violence might come from someone selling you something fake, if they were legal and regulated you'd never have to worry about the chance that they're fake, or laced. Think about alcohol prohibition for a second. More people drank alcohol when it was against the law, it allowed the mob to take over, make tons of money and pretty much become the law of an area as their new (non taxed) income has allowed them to get more people and weapons. All we would need would be programs that taught the truth about substances, not the lies that are taught now. There are so many times where someone comes to me with some ridiculous info about weed and find out its just a myth that's been going around for years. I've done LSD in many states and it seems like everywhere I go the whole story about how someone accidentally took a whole vial and thought they were a glass of juice and couldn't sleep cause they'd spill, Or thought they were a banana and tried to peel themselves, that story has been around for so many years its crazy, and everywhere I go people always act like they KNOW the person it happened to, or it was a friend of a friend. Is it possible that this is true or is it an urban legend from the government in the 60's. http://www.snopes.com/horrors/drugs/orange.asp or just search on google, so many variations.

Plus, making them illegal makes it easier for younger kids to get them as dealers do not care about an age as much. For most people in High School, weed is easier to get then alcohol because you have to find someone 21 to get your alcohol. At least in my area. Now, I'm the one getting the alcohol but all my friend's brother's friends (all around 18 ) can easily get weed, coke, psychedelics, and whatever else is around at the time, but find it hard to get alcohol without me.

Think about it
 

CrackerJax

New Member
I think everyone here pretty much agrees with the post above. I do. Like most serpents of bad laws and control mechanisms, the head must be attacked, not the tail.

The ballot box is our strongest ally as well as public sentiment... check out this chart...it could be close at hand...



out. :blsmoke:
 

Bear*rack Olama

Well-Known Member
pharmaceutics can't get into weed. it's a natural substance therefore it cannot be patented. too much complexity to it I suppose. it's a good thing though.

weed itself yes very true, the cannaboids in that weed,, they can and are patenting for pharmaceutical drugs.:spew:
 
Top