Nice copy and paste.
Here are some reasons why evolution is wrong.
HUh?Because the bird no longer needs the wing in its environment.Are you trying to tell me that an ostrich cannot escape a predator, or fight back?It loses the wing in order to gain other advantages, seems pretty obvious.
#1 The idea of natural selection sounds great when you consider the deer.Deer can sense danger and run fast and escape danger.One flaw is the bird,why would a bird evolve a wing stub that is useless.They are to small for the bird to fly and will not help it escape predators.Why would it evolve a useless wing,this is backwards of the theory of evolution.Which is they evolve to adapt and change to survive better in their enviroment.Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless.A bird with a half sized wing is put at a great disadvantage in its enviroment.
The theory of evolution is based on the most adaptable member of a species,not a bird with a wing stub.
Absolute nonsense.There are no made up creatures being used to fill gaps.That is the sole province of religion. Making up a creature who has never been proven to exist, yet offering no explanation as to where this creature is, what actual evidence we have of it,(other than hearsay,the bible)and why, if it was the author of intelligent design, it didn't get it right in the first place?Being as it's omnipotent and doesn't make mistakes, please explain disease, deformation, and death as evidence of an omnipotent being who cannot make mistakes?Surely he'd be able to design better creatures?
#2 Evolutionist claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution.Evolutionist line up many pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another.Humans are a great example.There are hundreds of extinct monkeys and apes with lots of fossil records.Evolutionist line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to man.Then they fill in the gaps with make believe creatures to fit the picture.They can only do this with man,they never do this with elephants or giraffes.All they prove is there are many individual species and does not prove evolution.
Because noone knows for sure the exact conditions on earth at the time that life came about.Of course it cannot be replicated.Creationists cannot come up with irrefutable proof of their Creator's existence, and do not even attempt to explain.
#3 Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form.The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell.The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms.The most modern labs are unable to create a living cell.In fact they are unable to create a single left handed protein molecule found in all animals.
It's called mitochondrial DNA.You only get it from your mother. The rest is just nonsense.Environmental factors DO play a part in the development of offspring.To suggest they are unchanged by environmental factors is foolish.An extreme example would be deformities caused by pollution.The placenta is permeable.
#4 Evolutionist ignore the problem surrounding the human egg and the male sperm in evolutionary theory.The female egg contains the x chromosome and the male sperm contains either an x or y chromosome.The female eggs develop in the ovaries while it is a baby(fetus).Evolutionist claim that enviromental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain.However,the enviromental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and connot have any effect on her offspring.Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent change.Females cannot be a part of the evolutionary theory for these reasons.
Where did you get this nonsense from?It's called Natural selection.
#5 The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built in error checking method and a DNA repair proces proves the evolutionary theory is wrong.The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.
Completely shows the author has no idea what the second law of thermodynamics is actually about.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics
#6 The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos.Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselfs into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionist.This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics that has never been proven wrong.Scientists cannot have it both ways.The second law of thermodynamics is proven to be correct.Evolution lacks any scientific proof.Evolution is a empty theory.
Wrong again.Chromosomes change because they are made of DNA, and DNA Constantly changes. Evolutionists don't say we evolved from monkeys.They merely suggest we have a common ancestor.This is proof that just because you string a bunch of words together doesn't mean you have any idea what you're talking about.
#7Ther is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA.The chromosomes within each species is fixed.This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female from another slecies.Man could not evolve from a monkey.Each species is locked into its chromosome count that cannot change.If a animal developed an extra chromosome or lost a chromosome because of some deformity,it could not successfully mate.The defect could not be passed along to the next generation.Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible.Evolutionists prove that a college education does not impart wisdom.
Right....no, evolutionists merely admit, noone knows for sure, and are unwilling to say something is fact without evidence pointing to that conclusion.Not so creationists.They're happy to tell you what happened, but give you no proof. If matter and energy must come from somewhere, you've defeated yourself.Because you cannot answer:Who created this creator?
#8 Evolutionists throw up their hands at the question of the origin of matter because they know something cannot evolve from nothing.They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the problem.The fact that matter exists in outrageously large quantities simply proves evolution is wrong.The big bang theory doesn't solve the problem either.Matter and energy have to come from somewhere.
FACT: Mars has NEVER had the exact conditions on it that earth has in it's past.Because it orbits farther from the sun, and has a weak magnetic field which does not hold a strong atmosphere.You're trying to compare apples and oranges.
#9 Two NASA land rovers named Spirit and Opportunity have explored mars during 2004.They show signs of water being present in the past.They prove that water was once abundant on the surface of mars,but they have not been able to find any signs of life or life in the past.Mars has a proven history of having flowing water at one time and a atmosphere suitable to support life forms.Mars has had all of the conditions necessary to provide the "spark" of life according to the evolutionary theory,yet there is no life on mars.The river beds and banks show no signs of vegetation or trees.The ground has no fossils and no organisms,it is sterile.
Now this one really takes the cake.We could probe for thousands of years and not even BEGIN to cover a significant portion of the Galaxy, let alone the universe.DO you realize how massive the Universe is? Just because you looked through a basket of red socks and found no white ones, you conclude, "White socks don't exist." Newsflash! There are 5,000,000,000,000 other baskets to go through!And each one of them contains 5,000,000,000,000,000 socks!
#10 Mars is not the only place that shows no signs of life.The entire universe lacks any sign of life.There are no radio signals that can be related to intelligent life forms.None of the billions of galaxies have been found to emit any intelligent radio signals.Scientists have been pointing every type of radio telescope possible into space for several decades in hopes of finding a intelligent signal,no signs of life have been found beyond earth.We are alone.OPH