The big bang is supported by tons of mathematical data and experiments. .
Can you tell me WHY that is wrong. Please amuse me in why the math or experiments would be wrong. Or are you going to take the easy way out and cop out and just say its wrong because a book that is supported by nothing but itself says its wrong.haha .............
tell me what made the stuff that exploded and created everything?
i believe god created everything
you believe nothing? created everything[/QUOTE
Again you are wrong, scientist might not know but they are still searching and trying to figure it out. A lot harder then saying you know yet not having any information the back it up. I never claimed I knew the whole story, but I see the information that has been provided from data and research and understand part of the puzzle. Then try to understand the rest, knowing that I may never know but it is worth the effort. I take the harder road to understanding things while you take the easy one.
Yes you put your faith in god I will understand science. I will correct you in saying I have no faith at all just understanding of evidence.you put your faith in science i put mine in god
But then if it is created by one entity and that entity is infallible, why do we have so many malformed infants, that have mutations that are so horrendous that they die very disturbing deaths?sure it can suggest it but doesnt prove it, sounds like you can explain everything by time and chance.
what its more likley to suggest is an amazing creator it could mean we were all created by one creator.
It is not faith, it is logic and evidence that the belief spawns from.you put your faith in science i put mine in god
But then if it is created by one entity and that entity is infallible, why do we have so many malformed infants, that have mutations that are so horrendous that they die very disturbing deaths?
.
Nothing is 100% in science, since any new piece of information can change what was once believed to be true. There is nothing that can refute evolution that has enough information to back it up. Sorry but 99% of science is theory, such as the Theory of Relativity. All scientist follow the same hypothesis-->theory--->law. Even a law can be refuted if enough information comes in to disprove it. By going by you previous logic most of science is wrong because it is not 100% right.hmm i figured you would know the answer to that.. maybe you forgot, noproblem.
the easy quick answer adam and eve sinned adam and eve sinned that sin brought evil, sickness, disease, death and (umm yeah i think thats it lol) into the world.
They say if you take a clone from a clone from a clone many many many times you end up with a differiant plant... u think thats true? anyways kinda like people god made adam and eve perfect which is why they could marry brother and sister with no defects but after awhile copy after copy things get messed up (because of sin of course)
been doing alittle homework
theory of evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. and scientific law must be 100% correct right? evolution is not a law so does that mean it has errors? alittle lost can you fill me in?
Nothing is 100% in science, since any new piece of information can change what was once believed to be true. There is nothing that can refute evolution that has enough information to back it up. Sorry but 99% of science is theory, such as the Theory of Relativity. All scientist follow the same hypothesis-->theory--->law. Even a law can be refuted if enough information comes in to disprove it. By going by you previous logic most of science is wrong because it is not 100% right. Of course there are holes in science, NO ONE says they know everything, yet they are working towards trying to.hmm i figured you would know the answer to that.. maybe you forgot, noproblem.
the easy quick answer adam and eve sinned adam and eve sinned that sin brought evil, sickness, disease, death and (umm yeah i think thats it lol) into the world.
They say if you take a clone from a clone from a clone many many many times you end up with a differiant plant... u think thats true? anyways kinda like people god made adam and eve perfect which is why they could marry brother and sister with no defects but after awhile copy after copy things get messed up (because of sin of course)
been doing alittle homework
theory of evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. and scientific law must be 100% correct right? evolution is not a law so does that mean it has errors? alittle lost can you fill me in?
Nothing is 100% in science, since any new piece of information can change what was once believed to be true. There is nothing that can refute evolution that has enough information to back it up. Sorry but 99% of science is theory, such as the Theory of Relativity. All scientist follow the same hypothesis-->theory--->law. Even a law can be refuted if enough information comes in to disprove it. By going by you previous logic most of science is wrong because it is not 100% right. Of course there are holes in science, NO ONE says they know everything, yet they are working towards trying to.
Nothing is 100% in science, since any new piece of information can change what was once believed to be true. There is nothing that can refute evolution that has enough information to back it up. Sorry but 99% of science is theory, such as the Theory of Relativity. All scientist follow the same hypothesis-->theory--->law. Even a law can be refuted if enough information comes in to disprove it. By going by you previous logic most of science is wrong because it is not 100% right.
err mabye a 3rd opinionNothing is 100% in science, since any new piece of information can change what was once believed to be true. There is nothing that can refute evolution that has enough information to back it up. Sorry but 99% of science is theory, such as the Theory of Relativity. All scientist follow the same hypothesis-->theory--->law. Even a law can be refuted if enough information comes in to disprove it. By going by you previous logic most of science is wrong because it is not 100% right. Of course there are holes in science, NO ONE says they know everything, yet they are working towards trying to.
If you can give me data that can support Creationism which means you have to support to existence of God with data from experiments I will rethink evolution. Till then...err mabye a 3rd opinion
If you can give me data that can support Creationism which means you have to support to existence of God with data from experiments I will rethink evolution. Till then...