Go look at Nocturn3's post, post #326.
i cant believe we are taling about this lol
OK his post says
The thing is, the wiki article is correct, if read in it's entirety. Fish just took a few sentences out of context (again).
and that agrees with my original post
it was not out of context i said this
There were two or three different groups of walking apes, and one was the
forefather of humans it has been estimated that the human
lineage diverged from that of chimpanzees about five million years ago, and from that of
gorillas about eight million years ago..
I did not take it out of context I said 2 or 3 apes one was our forefather
You took a sentence from wiki, when a few lines above it it says "we did NOT evolove from chimps". You copied the part that you felt supported your position and left the rest, that CLEARLY DIDN'T support your position, out.
it said
we did not evolve from chimps and
i said "
two or three different groups of walking apes"
i couuld of said we did not evolve from chimps. but humans lineage diverged from
or is it that much diffararent to say there were 2 or 3 apes and humans lineage direrged from one of them?
This shows that you will resort to these kinds of tactics just to 'win' whatever 'argument' you feel we might be having.
i can not win this argument. i can only learn from it
This also shows that you cannot admit when you're wrong.
i am wrong alot but i am not wrong on what i was thinking when i typed everything NOW how you interpreted it.. i could be wrong for not explaining it well enuf... i thought you would understand you are the person claiming to understand science more than the average person.
It's just become a waste of time at this point.
maybe for you its a waste but i am learning alot about what other people believe