Dr. Greenhorn
Well-Known Member
nope! lol
Figure This Led Haters
- Thread starter ledgrowing
- Start date
FuZZyBUDz
Well-Known Member
dingbang
Active Member
The thread should have been done already with this post.
JN811
Well-Known Member
wow a bit defensive huh? lmao
JN811
Well-Known Member
hahahahaahNOPE! just RAPE the LED growers out of their hope and will.
ledgrowing
Well-Known Member
led is the best it may be way more money but if your hps were so good sell some shit get off the welfare and buy some led hps users who hate led simply can not afford them
C
chitownsmoking
Guest
theres potential in l.e.d. for sure... but has of right now its not fukking with hps!!!! at all....
MAYBE IF THEY MADE A REAY REALY BIG L.E.D. LIGHT......
...........
yet i can afford the money to pay for electricity. your reasoning is whack.
JN811
Well-Known Member
oh yea.. PROVE IT!! how many times u guys gonna say that without a single pic to prove it, wait that guy with the pics above said the same thing. TALK IS CHEAP!!
8 days veg from seed.. beat it with ur craptastic leds... hahaha
VS.
what like a month or so? this guy said that he was growing dank and us hps users grew swag.. u showed us..
Attachments
![000_0001[1].jpg](/data/attachments/622/622986-044fdf302dcd3cf1a076b3167154ae86.jpg)
C
chitownsmoking
Guest
yoooo i would even rather grow with t5's over leds......
JN811
Well-Known Member
wrong those ppl who hate leds hate paying for expensive needless equipment that does a subpar job..
ledgrowing
Well-Known Member
wrong your just an ignorant ..... that refuses to see the future but its all good keep buying bulbs keep paying huge electric bill with shitty weed led quality will be better everytimewrong those ppl who hate leds hate paying for expensive needless equipment that does a subpar job..
it must suck to be such a SHITTY grower that you have to give ALL the credit to a light.
i pay about 100 a month to grow 3 pounds, ...
C
chitownsmoking
Guest
what strain is that in the pic with your hand? that isnt hijack is it?
JN811
Well-Known Member
tooo funny. so basically ur saying.. wait let me get this staight, correct me if im wrong.. We (HID) users are ignorant.. because we spent less money on a far superior product as proven time and time again.. but we have to buy bulbs, what every 20,000 hours or so? and pay a small ammount more in electricity that all the extra bud we get pays for?? Do I have it about right?But leds are better cause they cost more?? hmm.. you are LED target consumer.. keep spending ur hard earned money on needless shit.. I know a million like u and u make this type of nonsense sell, which is the only reason its still around and as expensive as it is..
Some reading material..
High initial price: LEDs are currently more expensive, price per lumen, on an initial capital cost basis, than most conventional lighting technologies. The additional expense partially stems from the relatively low lumen output and the drive circuitry and power supplies needed.
Temperature dependence: LED performance largely depends on the ambient temperature of the operating environment. Over-driving the LED in high ambient temperatures may result in overheating of the LED package, eventually leading to device failure. Adequate heat-sinking is required to maintain long life. This is especially important when considering automotive, medical, and military applications where the device must operate over a large range of temperatures, and is required to have a low failure rate.
Voltage sensitivity: LEDs must be supplied with the voltage above the threshold and a current below the rating. This can involve series resistors or current-regulated power supplies.[65]
Light quality: Most cool-white LEDs have spectra that differ significantly from a black body radiator like the sun or an incandescent light. The spike at 460 nm and dip at 500 nm can cause the color of objects to be perceived differently under cool-white LED illumination than sunlight or incandescent sources, due to metamerism,[66] red surfaces being rendered particularly badly by typical phosphor based cool-white LEDs. However, the color rendering properties of common fluorescent lamps are often inferior to what is now available in state-of-art white LEDs.
Area light source: LEDs do not approximate a point source of light, but rather a lambertian distribution. So LEDs are difficult to use in applications requiring a spherical light field. LEDs are not capable of providing divergence below a few degrees. This is contrasted with lasers, which can produce beams with divergences of 0.2 degrees or less.[67]
Blue hazard: There is a concern that blue LEDs and cool-white LEDs are now capable of exceeding safe limits of the so-called blue-light hazard as defined in eye safety specifications such as ANSI/IESNA RP-27.1-05: Recommended Practice for Photobiological Safety for Lamp and Lamp Systems.[68][69]
Blue pollution: Because cool-white LEDs (i.e., LEDs with high color temperature) emit proportionally more blue light than conventional outdoor light sources such as high-pressure sodium lamps, the strong wavelength dependence of Rayleigh scattering means that cool-white LEDs can cause more light pollution than other light sources. The International Dark-Sky Association discourages the use of white light sources with Correlated Color Temperature above 3,000 K
ledgrowing
Well-Known Member
must suck to be a dick and sit here giving shitty comment on every thread i read i always see u and unless its your thread your neg i dunno how u became a mod but i can see with people like you here why people leave this site for othersit must suck to be such a SHITTY grower that you have to give ALL the credit to a light.
trueplayer
Member
no way r leds better than hps in turms of lumens and coverage ?
