What I was pointing out is his lack of scientific merit. He may be a perfectly pleasant person to have lunch with, I have no idea. But anytime we go looking into claims of actual proof of aliens, we find the same characteristics we are finding here. I am not impressed that he found a couple other scientists to back him up, even a whole team wouldn't impress me. What I need is independent replication and review but the scientific community as a whole. That is the same standard we apply to any other body of knowledge.
They may discuss openly that they have evidence, but details are charged for. I am not the one saying he isn't 'seeking pedestrian answers', he is. He blatantly stated "until someone can prove otherwise, I have to work on the assumption that these implants are of alien origin." Someone meaning someone else... he is content to assume they are alien. That is NOT science.
I held my opinion until I did some research. What I found was no proof, shady dealings, and no transparency. What I found was a man making mistakes because he doesn't understand how the scientific method works, or why we have it in the first place. What I found was the typical tricks and mistakes often made with paranormal claims. I found information that, for obvious reasons, does not pass peer review when examined by actual scientists, even though it was first presented in 1996.