missouri hb 1472

G

ghondy

Member
Trying to figure out what chemicals I can use to make herbal incense to sell in retail stores in my
Area. Its missouri hb1472 thank you
 

  • 1-pentyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole
  • (6aS,10aS)-9-(hydroxymethyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydrobenzo[c]chromen-1-ol
  • 2-[(1R,3S)-3-hydroxycyclohexyl]- 5-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)phenol
  • 1-butyl-3(1-naphthoyl)indole
  • (6aR,10aR)- 9-(Hydroxymethyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydrobenzo [c]chromen-1-ol


This includes all Analogs of these. I left them in IUPAC nomenclature, you can figure it out from here if you are really interested.
 
In chemistry, a structural analog (structural analogue), also known as chemical analog or simply analog, is a compound having a structure similar to that of another one, but differing from it in respect of a certain component. It can differ in one or more atoms, functional groups, or substructures, which are replaced with other atoms, groups, or substructures.

If you are interested I could prolly make a list of potential analogs..
 
Nope, and probably on purpose (they want to catch the stupid people looking for a "get rich quick" scheme who have ZERO chemistry knowledge).
 
Is there a chance they'll synth an even closer analogue of THC then JWH-073?
Im hoping for a better replacement, what was that other analogue you had mentioned shep that was near 70x stronger then THC, dont quote me on that but I know its something along those lines.
 
I think CP 55490 is somewhat close to THC.

Federal Analog Act:


  • (I think) One of the RCS-series substances is an analog of either JWH-018 or JWH-200.
  • JWH-019 is a Homologue of JWH-018 (which is the trans diastereomer, C8 Homologue of CP 47497)
  • Cannabicyclohexanol
 
thehairyllama said:
Which would you prefer the HU-210 or JWH-073? Is there another analogue you like better then both?
Click to expand...

HU-210 is a Schedule I substance. With that aside I would be very interested to see a comparison of HU-210 vs JWH-122 vs JWH-210 vs JWH-073. "Better" is pur opinion, CB1 agonists (such as the four listed above) should follow a more "Sativa-like" high.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Commercial cultivator, personal grower. AMA
Replies
0
Views
1K
Onyxxa
O
R
Iowa still with Reefer Madness
Replies
10
Views
2K
BullPower
BullPower
J
Flower light near Columbus Ohio
Replies
2
Views
511
Cboat38
Cboat38
U
Nutrient deficiency
Replies
5
Views
536
UDTghost840
U
Bonghitbob
Seeds in your bud!
Replies
4
Views
2K
KleenHippie
KleenHippie
Back
Top