bob harris
Well-Known Member
Of course..would you expect different?Wrong. They went after dispensaries because they do not want this law and
they do not care what the majority of the state wanted and voted for. They
will do everything they can to disrupt this law and the FULL IMPLEMENTATION
of the LAW. You see what you law enforcement and politicians do not realize is that
IT IS THE LAW wether you like it or not. And it will be FULLY IMPLEMENTED
one day. You see alot is said about all the people that have cards and that go to dispensaries
about how they don't look like they need it. But I do not hear or see arguments about
ammendments to the law to make sure people are legitamily getting cards. Instead I see
everything is about making sure it is near impossible for ANYONE to use the law.
The OP is one to believe that if you do not look like they want you to look. Well
then even though you are sick You simply don't matter.
When any law is enacted, it is usually restricted, and controls put in place, before it is expanded.
That's done to stop the profiteering and abuses.To make the law work in a socially accepted manner.
Do you suggest an "anything goes" approach?
And there is a bill currently circulating to define Doctor patient relationships as they apply to issuance of cards.
It's a complex issue. My doctor for example..a well known Neurologist, at the largest Parkinson's specific facility in Michigan, is an advocate of cannabis for Parkinson's. He can not however, endorse use, as far as signing an application for a card, because of the rules of the facility that he works for.
That makes Doctors willing to sign apps necessary.
The issue is in holding the doctors willing and able to sign apps accountable for actually establishing a valid condition, before approving apps.
In practice, the Doctors willing to approve apps...approve for anything..they are simply profiteering, selling approvals, not objectively evaluation medical needs.
Hence the catch 22 problem..which is being address by law makers.