Heard an Interesting POV...

doc111

Well-Known Member
Willyßagseed;6765870 said:
Won't work, the corporations would love a smaller government........ fewer politicians to bribe. :eyesmoke:
Not true. They don't take bribes. They are called "campaign donations". Say it with me now; C-A-M-P-A-I-G-N D-O-N-A-T-I-O-N-S!:mrgreen:
 

FilthyFizzle

Active Member
Umm, no. the government could make contractual stipulations that prevent all of that from happening. You need to learn more about law.

What good would a parking lot in the middle of a forest in sparsely populated areas do? the logging company would LOSE money if they did that since NO ONE would park there. Logging companies do not clear cut either, they selectively cut swaths because their future profit depends on good stewardship of the forest.
I'm sorry but you are wrong. The governor of Maine wants to cut and develop 10 million acres of Northern Maine wilderness. It's all about money not whats right for the earth. Logging companies do clear cut and a lot of them get away with it too
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member

  • It's all about money not whats right for the earth.​


The earth? The earth doesnt have feelings, the earth doesnt care.


  • Logging companies do clear cut and a lot of them get away with it too​


When you want to directly argue with someone's point it is usually best to actually provide some proof of your point. "I said so." is not a very strong debating tool. So, show us some evidence that a company has clear cut any area in America in the last decade. I would be fascinated to read all about it and how much they were fined by the government.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry but you are wrong. The governor of Maine wants to cut and develop 10 million acres of Northern Maine wilderness. It's all about money not whats right for the earth. Logging companies do clear cut and a lot of them get away with it too
Wanting to do something and actually doing it are totally different things. Logging companies do not clear cut in the USA. And when i say clear cut i mean deforestation. where every tree is cut, whether or not it goes to a lumber mill. If logging companies just did clear cutting all the trees would be gone by now. They actually do selective cutting and leave SOME of the best trees standing because they found out in the 50's and 60's that indiscriminate cutting of the best trees caused genetic problems with the quality of the trees they left behind.

Gov LePage wants to hire Canadian loggers to log, not cut down the whole forest.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
All gmo products are labeled in my market. If you want to get away from gmos it's not to hard... There is more pressure for gmos than against which is why they are still around.




THere is good evidence to support - here is the evidence. There, I reworded it for you. Why do socialists like you believe everything should come in exact terms? Why do they attack wording and semantics over the issue itself? Why the diversion?
There is no GMO labeling in my market - do you actually think a state could accomplish such a mandate? And I am not a socialist, I am a realist - entirely different things. I am not diverting anything at all, I call them as I see them and we have no better method of understanding each other than by the words we each use.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
I dunno about you, but I regulate with Moral authority. I do not sell anyone shitty, moldy, fluffy bud. I do not sell to people under the age of 21. I do not sell to people I do not know.
The marijuana we have is well regulated, it just didn't take any Federal intervention to make it that way.

Look at ethanol regulations, they have enriched corn growing states immensely but have hurt the cattle feed industry and the human food markets terribly.
You are an ethical individual, many people are, you are likely very proud of your product. Not everyone is, Back to our unfettered marketplace again - MDMA is cut with speed, pot is sprinkled with glass beads, Heroin is spiked with who knows what. This is what happens in a truely free market, not all the time, but still it happens because not everyone is as moral or ethical as you or I may be.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
What article?
the perchlorate article I posted as an example of what corporations (ethical or not) can do to an environment - you claim that a boycott of the transporter of perchlorate would have some effect, the article states that numberous companies simply dumped the stuff into the ground or water supply - no transportation. So who would you boycott?
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
I don't want to speak for anyone else but that's not what I took from Gastanker's post. Go back and read it. I think he was saying that corporations aren't some faceless, evil entity bent on the destruction of the species, the environment, economy, Hell! The world? lol! We are all dependent on things which are made by those same "evil corporations". Your friends and neighbors (provided they are employed) might be working at some of those same "evil corporations". Sure, we have a handful of examples of corporate shenanigans and malfeasance. So we should demonize ALL CORPORATIONS? That's like someone saying we should exterminate the human race because a relative few are murderers! lmfao!!!!!!:-P

The stated purpose of for profit corporations is the enrichment of stockholders. They do not seek to destroy the species, the environment or the economy but when they run at cross puproses then profit takes precidence and that is the all important point. We should demonize no corporations, we should employ the governmental resources we have in order to pressure them into complying with certain rules that keep us all more safe, if within those rules, they can make a profit - fine, great, wonderful, if they cannot, tough.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
You are an ethical individual, many people are, you are likely very proud of your product. Not everyone is, Back to our unfettered marketplace again - MDMA is cut with speed, pot is sprinkled with glass beads, Heroin is spiked with who knows what. This is what happens in a truely free market, not all the time, but still it happens because not everyone is as moral or ethical as you or I may be.
You are right, and it happens not becasue government isn't regulating it, but becasue you have unscrupulous people who do such things. If Making something illegal means it is not regulated then Murder is unregulated as is wife beating, speeding on the road, throwing trash on the street, jaywalking, fraud....The list can go on and on. If something is made illegal it is regulated.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
the perchlorate article I posted as an example of what corporations (ethical or not) can do to an environment - you claim that a boycott of the transporter of perchlorate would have some effect, the article states that numberous companies simply dumped the stuff into the ground or water supply - no transportation. So who would you boycott?
relink the article so that I may read it please.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
The stated purpose of for profit corporations is the enrichment of stockholders. They do not seek to destroy the species, the environment or the economy but when they run at cross puproses then profit takes precidence and that is the all important point. We should demonize no corporations, we should employ the governmental resources we have in order to pressure them into complying with certain rules that keep us all more safe, if within those rules, they can make a profit - fine, great, wonderful, if they cannot, tough.
Great Idea, im all for it, only problem is that the biggest companies who can't make it (most of the banks) will be propped up at taxpayer expense until the whole system finally crashes. Government regulates only the activities of those companies who do not provide large campaign donations to politicians. We ALL know that most politicians are on the take and only do what they are told to do by whoever pays the most.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
You are right, and it happens not becasue government isn't regulating it, but becasue you have unscrupulous people who do such things. If Making something illegal means it is not regulated then Murder is unregulated as is wife beating, speeding on the road, throwing trash on the street, jaywalking, fraud....The list can go on and on. If something is made illegal it is regulated.

You saw my argument about this already.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Great Idea, im all for it, only problem is that the biggest companies who can't make it (most of the banks) will be propped up at taxpayer expense until the whole system finally crashes. Government regulates only the activities of those companies who do not provide large campaign donations to politicians. We ALL know that most politicians are on the take and only do what they are told to do by whoever pays the most.
Fine, we may agree but the discussion is more along the lines of regulation and less along the lines of political tendancies of government.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
You wish Oil was archaic but it is one of the most efficient fuel sources we have right now for the money.
Actually it isn't if you take all of the damages caused by our use of oil. Currently we only see a fraction of the true cost of oil in the figures at the pump. Furthermore you say "we have RIGHT NOW", without some sort of foresight and action regarding that foresight your statement will become false on its own.
 
Top