The UK Growers Thread!

tip top toker

tip top toker

Well-Known Member
mad dog bark said:
so tt u still planning on the long trip over the big pond? is it looking good for u?
Click to expand...
Aye, still working on it, lots and lots of hoops to jump through but it should all be good :) Jut keeping my fingers crossed that it'll all sort out early enoguh that i still manage to spend a few months with my old flatmate who's out there already, the cunt.
 
tip top toker

tip top toker

Well-Known Member
Indeed they are, but you won't get a policeman or judge to accept that :D Statutes are corporate rules, little more. One big bucket of corruption. I mean damn, the government can't even give me an explanation as to what the drug laws are for, it's factually proven that they have nothing to do with health, nothing to do with society, so what are they for? Who knows, they certainly don't wish to say.

I'm keeping my eye on this Febuary 27th deal on essentially decriminalisation of weed for personal users, they're even looking at accepting medical usage as a defense in court :) not read much about it and it seemed to be more news stories as to actual sources, but i'm keeping my eyes open :)
 
M

mad dog bark

Well-Known Member
wot worrys is its politicians who make and pass the statures but they dont legally have to foolow these statures just basic laws. they r above the rules they have power to change. howw fucked is that
 
tip top toker

tip top toker

Well-Known Member
supersillybilly said:
I lawfully entered her, I legally entered her. Whats the difference??????????
Click to expand...
Not too easy to say, but think of "law" as a big wooden box, and "legal" and the contents of the box. The contents can change but they have to stay within the box. Kind of like how federal law trumps state law. Hahaha, fucking great way of wording it, you must now know exactly what i mean :lol:

It is a fact though, everyone will try and convince you that they are the same thing, but just searh out examples of the court systems finding the governemnts legislation as unlawful. If they were the same thing, then it couldn't be found as unlawful, but for a statute to be found as unlawful means that there is a criteria that statutes have to abide by, meaning that as such, they are not the top of the list when it comes to authority.
 
supersillybilly

supersillybilly

Well-Known Member
tip top toker said:
Not too easy to say, but think of "law" as a big wooden box, and "legal" and the contents of the box. The contents can change but they have to stay within the box. Kind of like how federal law trumps state law. Hahaha, fucking great way of wording it, you must now know exactly what i mean :lol:

It is a fact though, everyone will try and convince you that they are the same thing, but just searh out examples of the court systems finding the governemnts legislation as unlawful. If they were the same thing, then it couldn't be found as unlawful, but for a statute to be found as unlawful means that there is a criteria that statutes have to abide by, meaning that as such, they are not the top of the list when it comes to authority.
Click to expand...
Im going to enter her regardless. lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top