Should Goldman Sach's be Impeached and Fired?

Should goldman sach's be impeached and fired?

  • No, I am voting for obama again.

    Votes: 8 30.8%

  • No, I am voting for Mitt Romney.

    Votes: 1 3.8%

  • No, I am voting for Newt.

    Votes: 2 7.7%

  • Yes, I am voting for Ron Paul.

    Votes: 15 57.7%
  • Total voters
    26
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
He will appoint cabinet members that aren't ex goldman sach's executives, effectively fire'n the current ex-goldman sach's executives. Is that clear enough or you want to debate some more semantics? Do you feel goldman sach's should be taken out of power? Yes or No question.
Click to expand...
how do you know ronald the millionaire will not appoint cabinet members from goldman sachs as well? did you talk to the old septuagenarian? did he make a speech announcing this?

and for the record, i do not trust ronald the millionaire to surround himself with the right people or even better people than the current administration or other poll choices. you and i have both agreed on this, ronald is not that very good at surrounding himself with the right people.
 
BenRound

BenRound

Member
Obviously, from what I have read in this thread and others, talking politics with Uncle Buck is like trying to talk to a 5 year old that's in the middle of a temper tantrum. With the added twist that he seems to delight in being purposely obtuse, intellectually dishonest, willfully ignorant and casting false aspersions and derisive comments toward anyone that isnt "politically correct" in his view.

Kinda reminds me of one of those people that were ignorant enough to vote for Obama last go around because they base their political decisions on sound bites like "Change We Can Believe In". Now they see they were wrong and voted for a black Bush III, but wont fess up to it--- and either wont or arent able to look into what can be done to bring about real change. If they did they would end up supporting Paul and that would be too much of a paradigm shift for their prior programming (brainwashing) to be able to handle.

But then again, maybe he's just the type that likes to try to piss people off.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
BenRound said:
Obviously, from what I have read in this thread and others, talking politics with Uncle Buck is like trying to talk to a 5 year old that's in the middle of a temper tantrum. With the added twist that he seems to delight in being purposely obtuse, intellectually dishonest, willfully ignorant and casting false aspersions and derisive comments toward anyone that isnt "politically correct" in his view.

Kinda reminds me of one of those people that were ignorant enough to vote for Obama last go around because they base their political decisions on sound bites like "Change We Can Believe In". Now they see they were wrong and voted for a black Bush III, but wont fess up to it--- and either wont or arent able to look into what can be done to bring about real change. If they did they would end up supporting Paul and that would be too much of a paradigm shift for their prior programming (brainwashing) to be able to handle.

But then again, maybe he's just the type that likes to try to piss people off.
Click to expand...
do you have anything to add, or was your whole point to come in and take a swipe at me?
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i know. it is clear that ronald the millionaire benefits from inside information he is privy to as a member of congress, and anyone who can put two and two together can see how his gold-mining investments would benefit from his gold standard pipe dream and abolishing of the EPA.

they're ALL corrupt, ronald the millionaire is no exception s you rightly point out.
Click to expand...
I already debunked your insider trading gold mining theory. give it up brahhhh

Now to stay on topic I think Goldman Sachs should officially buy Obama for 1 trillion dollars in fake money to clear up any discrepancies.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
ronald the millionaire will fire employees of a private company?

sounds unconstitutional to me.
Click to expand...
How is that any more unconstitutional than Obama only hiring "green" companies on the basis carbon dioxide by humans is killing the earth, when the majority of the green house gas is from the ocean? So Obama's solution is getting rid of the ocean? Bet the world would love that.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan said:
How is that any more unconstitutional than Obama only hiring "green" companies on the basis carbon dioxide by humans is killing the earth, when the majority of the green house gas is from the ocean? So Obama's solution is getting rid of the ocean? Bet the world would love that.
Click to expand...
we can debate the merits of weening off of foreign oils or the climate change theory if you would like, but that's a whole other thread.

did ya happen to catch the WSj article the other day from "16 concerned scientists", which consisted of people who were not even scientists or worked for exxon? hilarious shit.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
we can debate the merits of weening off of foreign oils or the climate change theory if you would like, but that's a whole other thread.

did ya happen to catch the WSj article the other day from "16 concerned scientists", which consisted of people who were not even scientists or worked for exxon? hilarious shit.
Click to expand...
I don't read the WSJ. It's like it's written by a bunch of Ivy League kids wanting to impress their professors. No one who lives in the real world talks like that.
 
sync0s

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Dan Kone said:
He won't need to. Even without Goldman Sachs lobbying him he wants to give them everything they ever wanted and more.
Click to expand...
If true, why isn't there media influence for Ron Paul? Why isn't there money being shoveled into his campaign?

Follow the dollar and it leads to the criminal.
 
PetFlora

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
lockheed martin high up on the list for ronald.

gee, they don't make a shitload of bombs or anything.

a vote for ronald the millionaire is a vote for more bombs
Click to expand...

This is an excellent example of the saying "Too little knowledge is a dangerous thing". First compare the dollar amounts, not the ranking. Hell, you could conclude that the military loves RP, therefore he is for more and bigger military, that is until you realize it is the soldiers who are supporting him. Why? BECAUSE they know how insane it is for our military to be stationed/fighting outside the US. And most of these guys became soldiers for a pay check that they could not get at home. FYI, I'm a Vietnam vet.
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
What do you guys think of our rulers Goldman Sach's Inc. (The British royal crown). Should they be impeached from the office of president and fired from cabinet and other positions of power?
Click to expand...

wtf has the british royal crown got to do with anything? your really off at the deep end now arent you? next will be the "lizard overlords" drinking babies blood and only RP can save us....

havent you ever thought that ron paul doesnt need to be bought by the big companies cause his batshit crazy ideas will give them their regulation wasteland by default. the big corps didnt get that way for paying for stuff when they didnt need to
 
sync0s

sync0s

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
wtf has the british royal crown got to do with anything? your really off at the deep end now arent you? next will be the "lizard overlords" drinking babies blood and only RP can save us....
Click to expand...
That really went over your head, didn't it?

ginjawarrior said:
havent you ever thought that ron paul doesnt need to be bought by the big companies cause his batshit crazy ideas will give them their regulation wasteland by default. the big corps didnt get that way for paying for stuff when they didnt need to
Click to expand...
Haven't you ever thought that regulation only serves to prop up monopolies and give large corporations more power and market control?
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
ginjawarrior said:
wtf has the british royal crown got to do with anything? your really off at the deep end now arent you? next will be the "lizard overlords" drinking babies blood and only RP can save us....
Click to expand...
It has everything to do with it. I see you haven't done much research, this companies founders and its children such as JP Morgan come from British bankers and your denial that it doesn't is as absurd as the lizard people example you gave.
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
ginjawarrior said:
havent you ever thought that ron paul doesnt need to be bought by the big companies cause his batshit crazy ideas will give them their regulation wasteland by default. the big corps didnt get that way for paying for stuff when they didnt need to
Click to expand...
So you expect goldman sach's to regulate themselves? I am sure that is exactly what they want thus why they sit as advisors to Obama and sold Obama and Romney to us. I think they like having the secretary of treasury and others being former sach's executives.

I could say that they fear the free market but I don't even have to go there, just look at obama's cabinet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top