Did Ron Paul Win Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri?

desert dude said:
Uncledivider isn't going to merge his own thread, just the ones that annoy him. He's a good liberal: it's not about having a free debate, it's about controlling the discussion.
Click to expand...

If he wanted to control it he would simply start deleting and editing posts.

Remember, there is no freedom of speech on a private forum on the internet. I wasted alot of blood pressure until I realized that. Life isnt fair.
 
NLXSK1 said:
If he wanted to control it he would simply start deleting and editing posts.

Remember, there is no freedom of speech on a private forum on the internet. I wasted alot of blood pressure until I realized that. Life isnt fair.
Click to expand...

I feel really bad for you that you didn't learned this till you were an adult.
 
deprave said:
Only when there is substantial breaking news about the elections do I write a thread at pivotal junctures. It is election season and this is the politics forums. I write here about a lot more than Ron Paul its just my threads about Ron Paul combined with others does sort of make a big jumble of Ron Paul threads combined with the fact that they get the most responses from lovers and haters of Ron Paul alike it keeps them on the front page.
Click to expand...

no you don't. the majority of your ron paul threads open with a pro-paul campaign video and some delusion on how he's killing it in the primaries....
 
ummm, hate to break it to you guys, but i am not a mod anymore. just a regular member.

if a mod feels that this thread needs to be merged, go ahead.

all your whining and pouting is music to my ears, though.
 
redivider said:
no you don't. the majority of your ron paul threads open with a pro-paul campaign video and some delusion on how he's killing it in the primaries....
Click to expand...

you didn't hear? ron paul IS killing it in the primaries. here's the strategy:

1) finish dead last in more contests than everyone else
2) never win a contest
3) rank dead last in national polls
4) ???
5) PROFIT!
 
Wow unclebuck how brainwashed are you? i take it you are enjoying the nwo puppet with there fluoride water, GMOs, and the better for you then sugar sweetners ie aspartame yumyum
 
What makes you so confident that Paul will get a majority of the delegates? Any evidence of this? Not trying to flame... Just wondering.

Edit: fixed error.
 
UncleBuck said:
i know, what a fucking cult.
Click to expand...

Ron Paul has a chance of winning, ignoring that fact and concluding that him winning is an absolute impossibility is cult mentality. He is less than 200 votes behind Romney$$ at 83% reporting for the populous vote shows that he has a chance. He isn't guaranteed to win the nomination, obviously that is not what we are saying. But you people rule it out as if it is an impossibility, ignoring the fact that he has a chance is arrogant and shows that you don't understand the nomination process.
 
because it isn't following the format of the other paul threads... -paul is so awesome -all of you should love ron paul because he is awesome -paul campaign video -paul 2012 -paul is doing great, the media is trying to cover it up -paul is being censored, everywhere... blah blah blah...
 
in the interests of fairness i merged another "Ron Paul loses" thread uncle buck started on Feb 2 with this one.

everybody happy?
 
redivider said:
because it isn't following the format of the other paul threads... -paul is so awesome -all of you should love ron paul because he is awesome -paul campaign video -paul 2012 -paul is doing great, the media is trying to cover it up -paul is being censored, everywhere... blah blah blah...
Click to expand...

Actually it was a thread explaining how the process works, unlike this thread which is just another hit piece on ron paul.
 
lifegoesonbrah said:
Ron Paul has a chance of winning, ignoring that fact and concluding that him winning is an absolute impossibility is cult mentality. He is less than 200 votes behind Romney$$ at 83% reporting for the populous vote shows that he has a chance. He isn't guaranteed to win the nomination, obviously that is not what we are saying. But you people rule it out as if it is an impossibility, ignoring the fact that he has a chance is arrogant and shows that you don't understand the nomination process.
Click to expand...

intrade gives him a 2% chance, and i think that is incredibly generous.

maybe if he racks up a few more last place finishes in arizona and michigan (he will), than he'll be winning. maybe.

lol, what a loser ron paul is.
 
ChronicObsession said:
I am not vegan. I am one of the millions of ignorrant animal eaters that are completely oblivious that an animal must suffer and slowly die while hanging upside down on a hook and leaking it's guts out before it turns into a yummy red steak or a cute hamburger
Click to expand...

They use a spike gun that blasts a metal ram through their skull, killing them instantly. Even better than bleeding them out.

It beats 99.9% of the other ways an animal could be killed for slaughtering purposes. What do you suggest, we wait for it to die of old age then butcher it? Unless you got a better idea........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

abandonconflict
Mid July
Replies
1
Views
230
Unclebaldrick
Unclebaldrick
hanimmal
Biden-Trump Debate Prep.
4 5 6
Replies
105
Views
5K
hanimmal
hanimmal
vostok
Bernie Sanders stirs Texas crowd, is he running for something?
2 3
Replies
55
Views
3K
ttystikk
ttystikk
Padawanbater2
The Democratic Party Autopsy Report
42 43 44
Replies
864
Views
39K
SneekyNinja
SneekyNinja
S
'Bernie Sanders Can Become President' Has Replaced 'I Like Him, But He Can't Win'
Replies
7
Views
783
schuylaar
S
Back
Top