Mithrandir420
Well-Known Member
I can smoke when biking but not when fighting. For me it depends on the activity.
The Weed Nerd~
- Thread starter subcool
- Start date
- Status
tranka32
Active Member
gladstoned
Well-Known Member
Bet if someone stole your weed while you were biking you would pull trifecta and do all three. lol
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
I dont like using any lighters smoking my medicine i either throw it in my extreme Q vaporizer or my triple perc bong and light it with red hot steel or glass rather than flame. Its much better on the lungs.
Medibles and tinctures work great for my back pain.
Medibles and tinctures work great for my back pain.
nugbuckets
Well-Known Member
great point.....never waste your breath on mediocre weed!......also, there is a huge difference between smoking organic weed vs. chem grown weed when it comes to negative affects on the lungs.
dirtysouthgenetics
Active Member
totally true,nugs
nugbuckets
Well-Known Member
....all this fucking talk by the pundits digging to find negative attributes of inhaled canna....but never any mention of chem vs. organic...they just lump everything together....like organic gravity kief or bubble, vs. chem bho......there is a huge difference!...if you are really in tune with your body, and you are accustomed to smoking organic, and then pull some tubes of chem grown weed, you can feel the carcinogentic nature of the residual chemicals and toxins....its like night and day.......one of the main reasons the few patients i have are so dedicated to smoking my meds, cause street weed makes them feel like shit.....chem grown weed is not meds.
Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
Interesting claim. (I assume you mean synthetic vs organic, as it is all chemicals). Could you please provide a link to this information?
Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
I do not doubt your experiences, I just hoped nug had a link so I could read more. AFAIK, scientific theory doesn't offer a clear suggestion as to why synthetics should be more harmful, so if there is a difference, I find it interesting and want to know about it, because science is always updating and learning new things. It wouldn't be the first time MJ growers have learned something before mainstream science, as research has been suppressed.
I would be interested in your thoughts about the mechanisms that make synthetics more detrimental to health. Not wanting to play devils advocate, just wanting to learn.
nugbuckets
Well-Known Member
i have just learned how to listen to my body....that is the only real science i know........if we waited for all the "studies" and scientific data....we would all die waiting.......i will trust patient reports over "studies" any day of the week.
StickEnugzz
Well-Known Member
Its all about the nitrates. Most/all synthetic fertilizers are derived from nitrates or salt. Organically grown buds do not hold those residuals in the plant material like synthetically grown buds do.(period)
Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
Ahh, I see, so you were just speaking your prerogative, fair enough.
Didn't mean to start a discussion here, as there are plenty of threads on this topic. I asked for a link not simply to play the opposition, but out of curiosity and, frankly, hope.
nugbuckets
Well-Known Member
or for patients with auto-immune issues....an ache in the liver!......there are a lot of folks out there with extreme chemical sensitivities, including myself, and a few of the patients i work with.....it is only my perogative, but it is one that i trust from experience...peace/love, nugs
Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
With the new research being done on medical MJ (and hopefully much more in the future) we may just find empirical evidence to support this, which is why I am always on the lookout. It would seem this chemical sensitivity would manifest when patients eat foods grown synthetically, and therefore have been noticed by medical science long ago. But we know cannabis is a unique plant in many ways with a complex chemical signature, so I am eager to see this studied. I think it is an important issue to sort out.
dirtysouthgenetics
Active Member
I love seeing my mentors work through a disscussion..without name calling or arguing..i wish our government would take aminute to learn from you guys...
nugbuckets
Well-Known Member
i hear you bro.....but here is the way i see it....like politicians and now doctors, scientists are being lobbied by currupt corporations with selfish agenda.....my guess is 95% of all scientific study is biased, influenced by selfish motivations......we can't trust politicians for obvious reasons, doctors because of big pharma drug sale initiatives and incentives, and now unfortunately scientists......granted there are privately owned labs that are run with a clear conscience, but how long before corporate cancer works its way in....never underestimate the power of authority or the human condition........i believe real honest health care must come from a grass roots initiative....that is why i put so much faith in the feedback from the patients i work with, because no one knows their suffering like they do themselves...it is a sad truth that sometimes it takes one to get gravely ill to truley get a sense of how fucked up our so called heathcare system really is..............nerds unite....nugs
- Status
