Nah, hiding would be the key word.
Fuck Islam
- Thread starter Amaximus
- Start date
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
to your fallacy . . . lol you can take my quote out of context but you cant replace context . . . lol
your as impotent a political poster as myself . . . only i know i havent a leg to stand on
So are you also saying the left in America does NOT defend Islam?
Simple question!
You are correct about one thing, I'll give you credit for that!
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
im saying prove it . . you talk and talk and talk and make accusations
just post some links with quotes . . . ..
basically put up or shut up . . . . .
\
not sure how you can keep claiming legitimacy without a list of dems and libs saying it . . .
kinda like how children boast to each other . .
just post some links with quotes . . . ..
basically put up or shut up . . . . .
\
not sure how you can keep claiming legitimacy without a list of dems and libs saying it . . .
kinda like how children boast to each other . .
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
How can "the left coddle Islam" be a common fact? The language itself betrays the accusation's origin: extremist Internet fora.
In fact, I charge you with not providing a link because I am sure it would lead right (!) to folks who think that America can only be reclaimed by means of Jesus, white skin, and hollowpoints.
Try humanizing your embedded claim. "The left" isn't some sinister monolithic hive. "Islam" isn't some sinister monolithic collective. Both those ideologies are populated by people every bit as individual and intractable as you and I.
So I am saying the question is unanswerable because it contains ambiguity and outright contradiction in the way it was framed.
And that is one of the reasons I am interested in your "fifth-grade-level" answer, the one you've already claimed exists ... and are now bound to provide*. i am curious to see how you reconcile those contradictions, as an exercise of insight into how you believe what you do. That is clearly more than you are willing to do for any of the sinister monolithic hive. Your biological and cultural distinctiveness will be added to our own.
cn*I would say "honor-bound" but I am satisfied with filleting your nonsense and do not see a need to julienne it.
Don't sweat it, cannabineer ran away from this question too!
I would have to be a fifth grade leftie, now wouldn't I.How can "the left coddle Islam" be a common fact? The language itself betrays the accusation's origin: extremist Internet fora.
In fact, I charge you with not providing a link because I am sure it would lead right (!) to folks who think that America can only be reclaimed by means of Jesus, white skin, and hollowpoints.
Try humanizing your embedded claim. "The left" isn't some sinister monolithic hive. "Islam" isn't some sinister monolithic collective. Both those ideologies are populated by people every bit as individual and intractable as you and I.
So I am saying the question is unanswerable because it contains ambiguity and outright contradiction in the way it was framed.
And that is one of the reasons I am interested in your "fifth-grade-level" answer. i am curious to see how you reconcile those contradictions, as an exercise of insight into how you believe what you do. That is clearly more than you are willing to do for any of the sinister monolithic hive. Your biological and cultural distinctiveness will be added to our own.
So, are you saying the left in America is not known for defending Islam, a simple yes or no will do.
Can one defend democrat and republican yet both those ideologies are populated by people every bit as individual and intractable as you and I?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Beennowhere, are you saying the right simply wants to attack Islam?
LOL I asked why most lefties mock Christianity but defend Islam, I also stated ( metaphorically) a fifth grader could answer the question, how the hell is that moving the goal posts? LOL
Not at all!
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
I dunno if it's an under-dose or an overdose of stupid pills you took. You're being pwnd.Let me translate 'neers response into simple talk for you
rove empirically that lefties mollycoddle Islam, then the discussion can begin.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
The original question. (Hint: it's a trap!)
The kicker. Even a fifth-grader! Type unspecified.
My response.
Weasel manuever #1.
Weasel maneuver #2: don't touch the substance of the answer. For extra credit, assail interlocutor's virility.
Weasel maneuver #3. Never mind the answer; just assail the other poster.
Weasel maneuver #3b. Doesn't deserve its own number because it's an attempt at rightnes through repetition. Herr Himmler would be proud.
Weasel maneuver #2b. It's played on this station before.
And to crown this pile of intellectual chitlins, we have a failure to remember the claim that a fifth-grader can answer it. Followed by weasel maneuver #4, or possibly 2c.
So there we have it, ladies and gentlemen. I am forced to conclude that I am arguing with a mustelid who does not want to display that he never went past 4th grade. Alternative conclusions are welcomed so long as you show your work. cn
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
comprehension skills are more important then spin skills, in a real discussion of ideas and or opinions
Being pwned, say's who, a Brit leftie LOLI dunno if it's an under-dose or an overdose of stupid pills you took. You're being pwnd.Let me translate 'neers response into simple talk for you
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Lol you just fail totally at life don't you?Would anyone else here like to try label me a leftie given my history of posting?If you think I'm a leftie you seriously need to go back to high school and learn SOMETHING about politics.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Uncle Buck?
Please, how would going back to high school educate me on the ideology of some anonymous poster on a cannabis forum? Are you serious, or maybe a tad bit vain!