Global warming pauses... for sixteen years

Doer

Well-Known Member
Canndo
Coincidence is exactly what science rules out. Because it is most often mistaken for miracle

Here you associate coincidence with guilt
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Canndo
Coincidence is exactly what science rules out. Because it is most often mistaken for miracle

Here you associate coincidence with guilt
are you ever going to acknowledge the disavowing of the article, or you just going to piss in a circle?
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
So my man Buck
Who are the mets
referred to?

You seem so smart as to answer for him.

You say you know how real men behave.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Hey, the left keeps telling me various things...

CO2 levels have gone up for the last 16 years yet the temperature plateaued...

That does not indicate a direct correlation between the two...
 

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member
Hey, the left keeps telling me various things...

CO2 levels have gone up for the last 16 years yet the temperature plateaued...

That does not indicate a direct correlation between the two...
You're not supposed to ask questions like that, its blasphemy
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Hey, the left keeps telling me various things...

CO2 levels have gone up for the last 16 years yet the temperature plateaued...

That does not indicate a direct correlation between the two...

As I said, the last 10 years have been the hottest on record - there is no warming hiatus. And I don't know if you noticed a nationwide drought - with more drought projected in the near future.

Can't be global warming though - that is just one more coincidence right?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
You are a smart guy, I have seen your arguments. Global climate is not deterministic and you know it. The oceans are buffering large amounts of co2, this you know as well. why are you all going out to some theoretical absurdity such as "we can't destroy the earth - it is simply too large" when the real question has never had anything to do with the planet but our ability to survive and thrive on it - a wholely different thing.


the oceans are becoming more acidic, this is known, at a certain point the oceans will no longer serve as carbon sinks and then you will see these rising peaks rise exponentialy.
Canndo, I am not arguing that the earth hasn't warmed, or that it won't continue to warm further. What I am arguing is that it is foolish, bordering on suicidal, to allow self-interested blow hards such as Al Gore to stampede us into crushing economic changes that won't make a god damn bit of difference. The Kyoto protocol, for example, would force developed nations to curtail gas emissions and do nothing to developing nations. Among the unaffected developing nations, China and India.

Despite the protestations otherwise, the fact that global warming has taken a sixteen year vacation remains, which might or might not mean anything substantial in the long run.

Speaking of loathsome, bloated, cronyistic douche bags, here is an editorial from today's Washington Post about none other than AlGore and how he has gamed the system and fucked you and me. I will post my favorite quote from the editorial, even though it does not directly puncture Gore's tax-fed belly:

"The point remains: Government, with its inevitable susceptibility to lobbying and favoritism, should not be picking winners and losers, whether through green subsidies or tax breaks for oil and gas."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-lane-liberals-green-energy-contradictions/2012/10/15/8c251ba2-16e6-11e2-8792-cf5305eddf60_story.html
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
It was far hotter in the past. You keep relying on limited data to make your assumptions...
yeah and how far back into this "past" do you have to go before you get to "far hotter" go find out for us

while your there finding that out you can also get a list of animals/ plants that are still around from then they couldnt be that much different to the ones we got now could they?
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Canndo, I am not arguing that the earth hasn't warmed, or that it won't continue to warm further. What I am arguing is that it is foolish, bordering on suicidal, to allow self-interested blow hards such as Al Gore to stampede us into crushing economic changes that won't make a god damn bit of difference. The Kyoto protocol, for example, would force developed nations to curtail gas emissions and do nothing to developing nations. Among the unaffected developing nations, China and India.

Despite the protestations otherwise, the fact that global warming has taken a sixteen year vacation remains, which might or might not mean anything substantial in the long run.

Speaking of loathsome, bloated, cronyistic douche bags, here is an editorial from today's Washington Post about none other than AlGore and how he has gamed the system and fucked you and me. I will post my favorite quote from the editorial, even though it does not directly puncture Gore's tax-fed belly:

"The point remains: Government, with its inevitable susceptibility to lobbying and favoritism, should not be picking winners and losers, whether through green subsidies or tax breaks for oil and gas."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-lane-liberals-green-energy-contradictions/2012/10/15/8c251ba2-16e6-11e2-8792-cf5305eddf60_story.html
It hasnt taken a vacation at all...
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Stupid one liners rule the lack of dissuasion

It seems meaningless to just say someone is wrong

Makes stupid talk not discussion
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
yeah and how far back into this "past" do you have to go before you get to "far hotter" go find out for us

while your there finding that out you can also get a list of animals/ plants that are still around from then they couldnt be that much different to the ones we got now could they?

You silly fool... heat comes from the sun. If you look at the periods of solar activity you will find they correlate much more closely to earth's temperature than CO2 levels.

But hey, lets not have reality get in the way of your pseudoscience.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
You silly fool... heat comes from the sun. If you look at the periods of solar activity you will find they correlate much more closely to earth's temperature than CO2 levels.

But hey, lets not have reality get in the way of your pseudoscience.
then why was it hotter in the past? the sun was cooler back then
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Periodic and not studied solar cycles
Of course
The only thing faulty is these pathetic
Insistences; to have to be right for ego
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
It was far hotter in the past. You keep relying on limited data to make your assumptions...

Yes, it was far hotter in the past, but we didn't live in the past, we live in another era, one that in the last half a million years at least, has been about where it is now. This is a false argument you make.
 
Top