cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Time will tell. cnI think the nature of this case makes it a hung jury without evidence that is overwhelming.
Time will tell. cnI think the nature of this case makes it a hung jury without evidence that is overwhelming.
the scuffle of grass? Really? Is that a really loud noise that wakes people out of a slumber and makes them run to the window thinking "What the hell was THAT?"if desert rat would learn to read, he'd know that several witnesses reported hearing the scuffle of grass.
I think he just rolled out of bed, grumpy maybe.is buck drunk . . .
is buck drunk . . .
Sometimes, I have sex with your mom, and the whole neighborhood hears it.Sometimes I hear ants fighting across the street over the sounds of dying llamas.
Sometimes, I have sex with your mom, and the whole neighborhood hears it.
Jk
Jesus, your little match-stick houses are so weak-sauce that you can hear "grass scuffle"?witnesses 11 & 20. their door was open, they muted the TV after hearing the final confrontation, and heard the scuffle of grass from north to south. that fits with physical evidence that goes south from the T.
was not drunk then but am drunk now.
New construction in America is just that, toothpicks reinforced with Chinese drywall and a thin layer of veneer. My house is over 120 years old and is made of stone, I can't even hear a 40 MPH wind outside.Jesus, your little match-stick houses are so weak-sauce that you can hear "grass scuffle"?
Fucking hell.
Your point 2 presumes that the situation went immediately to Zimmerman being beaten. You and I both know that that has not been established. If Zimmerman is indeed deemed the aggressor, it will be for the actions during the uncovered minutes, and it will be on the strength of evidence not revealed to us at this time. I won't speculate on what that evidence supports. cn
I don't know what you know, but I know that Zimmerman was beaten. It is self evident. That he was beaten is one of the most established facts.Your point 2 presumes that the situation went immediately to Zimmerman being beaten. You and I both know that that has not been established. If Zimmerman is indeed deemed the aggressor, it will be for the actions during the uncovered minutes, and it will be on the strength of evidence not revealed to us at this time. I won't speculate on what that evidence supports. cn
I must say that you guys are good for a laugh:if desert rat would learn to read, he'd know that several witnesses reported hearing the scuffle of grass.
I doubt the known info ... part of it is from the least consistent witness in recent memory, Z himself. And the other eyewitness "info" is of low quality.I don't know what you know, but I know that Zimmerman was beaten. It is self evident. That he was beaten is one of the most established facts.
How did he get a broken nose and lacerated skull if not at the hands of Martin? Seriously, I would like you to answer that.
To me, the fact that Zimmerman was battered and Martin was not is probably the strongest bit of evidence in the case. The fact that an eye witness stated that Martin was on top of Zimmerman beating him MMA style completely corroborates this physical evidence. The fact that there is a 45 second recording of Zimmerman screaming for help, and one of Zimm's first statements to the policeman on the scene, literally within minutes of the cop getting there, was, "I was calling for help, but nobody came...". Again completely corroborates the recording.
Given this known info, what does it matter if "Zimm started it"?
I doubt the known info ... part of it is from the least consistent witness in recent memory, Z himself. And the other eyewitness "info" is of low quality.
The other minor point is that Z's skull received no injury. cn
No need. We both know. cn
took me 10 seconds to find the picture. Let me anticipate your response: "that is his scalp, not his skull..."