Here it comes - gun control!!!

Thats not advocating dumb people,that is me doing it and i am far from dumb.

Just because you and your ilk cant function after a few drinks that is your problem.

You still have nothing and grasping at straws.

Drunk:
1a : having the faculties impaired by alcohol


Operating a weapon that is capable of killing people outside of your immediate area while drunk is dumb. If you're operating a deadly weapon while alone and drunk, you're dumb. So if you're endorsing you shooting drunk, then you're endorsing a dumb person shooting drunk.
 
Drunk:
1a : having the faculties impaired by alcohol


Operating a weapon that is capable of killing people outside of your immediate area while drunk is dumb. If you're operating a deadly weapon while alone and drunk, you're dumb. So if you're endorsing you shooting drunk, then you're endorsing a dumb person shooting drunk.



Maybe your dumbass would miss the target! I dont miss what i aim at...Period....
 
Maybe your dumbass would miss the target! I dont miss what i aim at...Period....

Isnt that a self defining statement? By definition you always hit what you aim at. However, what you aim at is not necessarily your intended target...
 
famous last words:

dude i can handle this ____________ even when im drunk!


Yep!! I have been shooting for over 3 decades and have never had a incident ever.

Not even that was close or damn wtf happened.

So you have your opinion i have mine have a nice day.
 
Oh shit i SHOOT darts drunk too,Damn i am dangerous....:o

Why don't Dr.'s operate drunk, or Astronauts fly the shuttle drunk? Obviously, if in your 30 years of being a drunken, gun toting idiot, you didn't shoot yourself or someone else, that means you can do anything drunk just as well as sober.

You know it's possible to flip a coin 1000 times and get heads every time? Doesn't mean it's likely though.

Your argument is simple reductio ad absurdum. With a bit of a sweeping generalization fallacy.
 
Why don't Dr.'s operate drunk, or Astronauts fly the shuttle drunk? Obviously, if in your 30 years of being a drunken, gun toting idiot, you didn't shoot yourself or someone else, that means you can do anything drunk just as well as sober.

You know it's possible to flip a coin 1000 times and get heads every time? Doesn't mean it's likely though.

Your argument is simple reductio ad absurdum. With a bit of a sweeping generalization fallacy.

Do you know how "Buzz" Aldrin got his nickname? Not to mention "Lean" Armstrong ... :mrgreen: cn
 
Cmon people, they already say letting the stupidest nation operate guns is pretty dangerous, i dont think we need to pour alcohol on that fire too ;) :P <3
 
Cmon people, they already say letting the stupidest nation operate guns is pretty dangerous, i dont think we need to pour alcohol on that fire too ;) :P <3

the stupidest nation is already largely barred from access to weapons. even their cops dont carry guns.

you gotta wonder about the intelligence of a nation that worships at the shriveled feet of a german monarchy but still thinks they are a great nation, so great they put the word in their name.
 
Why don't Dr.'s operate drunk, or Astronauts fly the shuttle drunk? Obviously, if in your 30 years of being a drunken, gun toting idiot, you didn't shoot yourself or someone else, that means you can do anything drunk just as well as sober.

You know it's possible to flip a coin 1000 times and get heads every time? Doesn't mean it's likely though.

Your argument is simple reductio ad absurdum. With a bit of a sweeping generalization fallacy.
Astronauts don't fly the shuttle whilst drunk because the shuttle was decommissioned.

Duh.
 
If your life depended upon you hitting a dime size target from 100m 5 times consecutively, would you perform the act drunk or sober?

He already said he doesn't go to the range drunk, so I think we have the answer to that question.
 
Exactly. The real dead eyes are the FBI. They ran a study back in the 70s. A fight house scenario. But, the agent is sacked out in a bed.

They waited a long time, so he is good and drifted off into daydreams at a minimum. The agent knows what is about it happen, just not when.

The agents could not consistently hit the pop up target, in the panic situation. That's just across the room in mostly dark. These guys were not afraid, just startled. I see that test as a pivotal moment in molding future gun laws. But, I think it is un-realistic. Yet, it is a good reason to have dogs. You will need a bit of alert.
 
Exactly. The real dead eyes are the FBI. They ran a study back in the 70s. A fight house scenario. But, the agent is sacked out in a bed.

They waited a long time, so he is good and drifted off into daydreams at a minimum. The agent knows what is about it happen, just not when.

The agents could not consistently hit the pop up target, in the panic situation. That's just across the room in mostly dark. These guys were not afraid, just startled. I see that test as a pivotal moment in molding future gun laws. But, I think it is un-realistic. Yet, it is a good reason to have dogs. You will need a bit of alert.

I agree 100%, that is why my property is marked clearly on all 4 sides with 2 signs on each side. One is for me and the wife, the other for the puppy. He is awesome at letting us know someone is around. He fears nothing...kinda scares me a little sometimes...lol
doggie.jpgmorning shot.jpgIMG_2214.jpg

Peace

Asmallvoice
 

Attachments

  • P1230157.jpg
    P1230157.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 5
I don't understand why cops use the German Shepard so much. The Caucasian Ovcharka would tear it up. But unlike the Pitbull, it can be easily trained and will release on command.
 
Back
Top