UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
false.
hitler only disarmed the jews.
an arsenal worked so well for those religious nuts and child rapists in waco.
Obama using kids as human shields...
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
hitler only disarmed the jews.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
i WOULD JUST LIKE TO REINERATE THANK GOD THE GERMAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TOOK GUNS AWAY IT WORKED OUT SO WELL FOR THE PEOPLE HITLER DIDNT REALLY NEED TO TAKE THE GUNS AWAY BECAUSE PEOPLE WOULD JUST FREAK OUT AND END UP SHOOTING EACH OTHER BECAUSE GUNS ARE SO COMPLICATED TO USE AND PEOPLE ARE COMPLETE MORANS BUT HITLER JUST TOOK THEM AWAY THAT WAY HE COULD SLAUGHTER ALL OF THE PEOPLE INSTEAD OF THEM ACCIDENTLY ALL KILLING EACH OTHER ACCIDENTLY WITH THEIR VERY COMPLICATED TO USE FIREARMS THANKS FOR THE FOLLOW UP.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
who eventually rescued the jews? the partisan jews, or the allied forces?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
thanks for letting us know that you're an idiot who drank the koolaid.
hitler did not disarm everyone. hitler expanded gun rights to all but the jews.
[h=3]The 1938 German Weapons Act[/h]The 1938*German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "...persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit." Under the new law:
- Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. Writes Prof. Bernard Harcourt of the University of Chicago, "The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition."[SUP][4][/SUP]
- The groups of people who were exempt from the acquisition permit requirement expanded. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German*Reichsbahn*Railways were exempted.[SUP][5][/SUP]
- The age at which persons could own guns was lowered from 20 to 18.[SUP][5][/SUP]
- The firearms carry permit was valid for three years instead of one year[SUP][5][/SUP]
[SUP][/SUP]
[SUP][/SUP]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Germany#The_1938_German_Weapons_Act
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
oMG WOW THAT IS A MIND FUCK THE PEOPLE WHO DIDNT HAVE GUNS DIDNT STOP HITLER BUT THE PEOPLE WITH GUNS DID BUT GUNS ARE BAD SO IM CONFUSED I NEED YOUR HELP WITH THIS ONE HOW COME THE JEWS DIDNT JUST KINDLY ASK THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO STOP KILLING THEM? aLL I KNOW IS GUNS ARE BAD SO ONLY GOVERNMENTS SHOULD HAVE THEM.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
people with guns working for the government did. thanks for making that distinction.
like i said, fighting the nazis without a standing army was no different than willingly getting on the train.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
oH WOW YOU ARE RIGHT AGAIN ONLY GUN CONTROL FOR THOSE WHO WERE TO BE PUT TO DEATH WHO WOULDVE THOUGHT YOU ARE SUCH A GENIOUS THANK GOD HITLER TOOK THE JEWS GUNS AWAY SO THEY DIDNT ACCIDENTLY KILL EACH OTHER FOR THEIR SAFETY ONLY SOUNDS GREAT HERES A GOOD COUPLE QUOTES I FOUND FROM SOME SMART MEN ON OUR SIDE:
“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.” — Mao Tze Tung ( 193
“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty" hITLER
On the morrow of each conflict I gave the categorical order to confiscate the largest possible number of weapons of every sort and kind. This confiscation, which continues with the utmost energy, has given satisfactory results.” mUSOLLINI
.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hitler expanded gun rights.
you have exposed either A) your complete ignorance of history or B) how easily you are sold lies by the NRA.
either way' it's gotta be pretty embarrassing for you, eh?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hitler expanded gun rights.oH WOW YOU ARE RIGHT AGAIN ONLY GUN CONTROL FOR THOSE WHO WERE TO BE PUT TO DEATH WHO WOULDVE THOUGHT YOU ARE SUCH A GENIOUS THANK GOD HITLER TOOK THE JEWS GUNS AWAY SO THEY DIDNT ACCIDENTLY KILL EACH OTHER FOR THEIR SAFETY ONLY SOUNDS GREAT HERES A GOOD COUPLE QUOTES I FOUND FROM SOME SMART MEN ON OUR SIDE:
“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.” — Mao Tze Tung ( 193
“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty" hITLER
On the morrow of each conflict I gave the categorical order to confiscate the largest possible number of weapons of every sort and kind. This confiscation, which continues with the utmost energy, has given satisfactory results.” mUSOLLINI
.
you are eating grass and sucking balls.
for someone who presents himself as intelligent, you sure do need everything explained to you. it's like dealing with a teenager.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
oH I GOT IT, SO GUN CONTROL IS GOOD WOW WHO WOULDVE THOUGHT MAYBE IF THE FRENCH AND AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONS COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED IF ONLY THEY WOULDVE HAD COMMON SENSE GUN CONTROL LAWS BECAUSE STANDING ARMIES SHOULD ONLY HAVE THEM THAT WAY GOVERNMENT CAN FIGHT AMONGST EACH OTHER ONLY AND PEOPLE WOULD HAVE NO SAY THANK GOD THEY DISARMED THE JEWS THAT WAY THEY COULD WAIT PEACEFULLY OUTSIDE THEIR OVENS WHILE THEY WAITED FOR CONTROLLED ARMIES TO COME RESCUE THEM AND PREVENT MILLIONS FROM BEING EUTHANIZED ITS KIND OF LIKE JUST WAITING FOR THE COPS TO GET THERE WHILE CHILDREN ARE BEING SHOT IN SCHOOLS WE SHOULDNT HAVE ARMED TEACHERS CUZ THAT WOUOLD BE DANGEROUS THANK GOD FOR GUN CONTROL.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you can't take out the government with a 10 round mag, that kind of thing requires a 33 round mag.
they should have hid in the forest. they'd all be alive and free today.
echelon1k1
New Member
lmfao... good to know you'd rather "live on your knees than die on your feet"
if you were around during the revolutionary war, there would be no USA, but please keep enlightening us with your military prowess...
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
yOU ARE RIGHT AGAIN BECAUSE FORBIDDING AN ENTIRE RACE OF PEOPLE FROM OWNING FIREARMS IS SOMEHOW NOT GUN CONTROL, YOU ARE A 10 ON THE SMART SCALE THANK GOD FOR COMMON SENSE GUN LAWS WHO WOULDVE THOUGHT THAT THE OPPRESSED RACE OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN FORBIDDEN TO HAVE GUNS FOR THEIR SAFETY AND THE OPPRESSORS WOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE GUNS MINDBLOWING.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
rEVOLUTIONS ARE ONLY WON BY ORGANIZED STANDING ARMIES YOU ARE SO INTELLIGENT THANK GOD FOR SMART LIBERALS SUCH AS YOURSELF.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
or they could have let them execute the warrant, or not gone back on their word, or not set their house on fire in between raping kids.they should have hid in the forest. they'd all be alive and free today.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
WWII was a revolution?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i have what are called "self preservation" instincts.*
that means i'm not going to try to take out the government with an AR15.
all you paranoid, delusional shitters calling for revolution because of reduced mag capacity are morons.
i can't get over how smart you really are. yet all you do is grow pot. you could be making millions if you simply applied yourself. what a waste.