echelon1k1
New Member
If it was a bunch of african americans being killed in waco, he'd be up in arms screaming liberal diatribes about how the man is oppressing them...they should have hid in the forest. they'd all be alive and free today.
If it was a bunch of african americans being killed in waco, he'd be up in arms screaming liberal diatribes about how the man is oppressing them...they should have hid in the forest. they'd all be alive and free today.
you said hitler took the guns away. ginwilly said hitler disarmed them by law.yOU ARE RIGHT AGAIN BECAUSE FORBIDDING AN ENTIRE RACE OF PEOPLE FROM OWNING FIREARMS IS SOMEHOW NOT GUN CONTROL, YOU ARE A 10 ON THE SMART SCALE THANK GOD FOR COMMON SENSE GUN LAWS WHO WOULDVE THOUGHT THAT THE OPPRESSED RACE OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN FORBIDDEN TO HAVE GUNS FOR THEIR SAFETY AND THE OPPRESSORS WOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE GUNS MINDBLOWING.
i'm gonna harvest tonight and probably play some more golf tomorrow. it's a rough life.i can't get over how smart you really are. yet all you do is grow pot. you could be making millions if you simply applied yourself. what a waste.
might as well do as little as possible. no sense in wasting all those smarts you got.i'm gonna harvest tonight and probably play some more golf tomorrow. it's a rough life.
i stay away from lakes though, i hear that's how they get ya.*
everyone but those damn jews.you said hitler took the guns away. ginwilly said hitler disarmed them by law.
overall, hitler expanded gun rights for almost everyone.
i'm just amusing myself of the internet revolutionaries and hitler historians here. typing 'hitler gun control' into wiki to disprove what the gun nuts are saying is not smarts though.might as well do as little as possible. no sense in wasting all those smarts you got.
I never called for reduced capacity. Self preservation, while your brethren are fighting off oppressors is nothing but an act of cowardice.i have what are called "self preservation" instincts.*
that means i'm not going to try to take out the government with an AR15.
all you paranoid, delusional shitters calling for revolution because of reduced mag capacity are morons.
no, seriously, you are hella smart. i've never seen you be wrong. you really should get out there and do something with yourself.i'm just amusing myself of the internet revolutionaries and hitler historians here. typing 'hitler gun control' into wiki to disprove what the gun nuts are saying is not smarts though.
my brethren? ya mean, the guy who checks my groceries at the store when i got out?I never called for reduced capacity. Self preservation, while your brethren are fighting off oppressors is nothing but an act of cowardice.
I've asked before but are you a convicted felon?
fixed it for ya.The basic right protected by the 2nd is the right to defend ourselves. Limiting a persons ability to do so just because they only need x amount of bullets or z type of gun is consistent with this basic right.
i think i'm gonna work on closing my stance a little more and swinging left. i was aimed too far open today and so when i did release the club it would go left, so i would compensate by holding it off and missing shots to the right at the times when i could least afford to do so.no, seriously, you are hella smart. i've never seen you be wrong. you really should get out there and do something with yourself.
you can fight off the united states army, but only if you have 33 round clips instead of 10 round clips?I have a headache from all of the sarcastic yelling, but seriously, your view is full of holes. All dictators disarm their victims, just like hitler did with the jews. That is why the right to bear arms is the second amendment right below freedom of speech. Your argument that guns are only effective in organized armies is non sense, its called guerrilla warfare and perseverance and it has happened all throughout history. To argue against this fact is non sense.
If the 2nd amendment specified our right to bear really sharp swords between the length of 28 and 35 inches, single shot long guns, knives under 6 inches and a guard dog you might have a valid point. It doesn't, you don't.fixed it for ya.
so you want to be a pro golfer?i think i'm gonna work on closing my stance a little more and swinging left. i was aimed too far open today and so when i did release the club it would go left, so i would compensate by holding it off and missing shots to the right at the times when i could least afford to do so.
i'll try it out tomorrow and let you know how it goes.
Like you bringing an axe to a gun fight?my brethren? ya mean, the guy who checks my groceries at the store when i got out?
anyone stupid enought o take up a battle they can't win is no brethren of mine. enough with the internet revolutionary nonsense, tough guy.
More like, when he grows up he wants to be president Tiger Woods.so you want to be a pro golfer?
nah, takes all the fun out of the game for me.so you want to be a pro golfer?
the SCOTUS has not struck down certain infringements on the right to bear arms. there is nothing inconsistent with the second amendment and certain restrictions.If the 2nd amendment specified our right to bear really sharp swords between the length of 28 and 35 inches, single shot long guns, knives under 6 inches and a guard dog you might have a valid point. It doesn't, you don't.