Obama using kids as human shields...

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
my brethren? ya mean, the guy who checks my groceries at the store when i got out?

anyone stupid enought o take up a battle they can't win is no brethren of mine. enough with the internet revolutionary nonsense, tough guy.
buck? why are you citing a holocaust denier?

we may disagree on a lot but surely we can all agree that anyone who thinks that buchenwald was a summer camp is beneath contempt...
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
This type of reaction baffles me.

Do you know the requirements as stated in the Constitution needed to go above an amendment?

The president doesn't have the power to pass an executive order to abolish any amendments. Nobody is behind the scenes getting charged up and coming for your guns. Even if restrictions were passed, your guns, the ones you own right now, would be safe from the rule. Do people really think the government has the resources/ability to do a sweep of the entire country and start confiscating guns?

...Really?
 

echelon1k1

New Member
@ kynes - again pathetic... your doucheiness is thwarted, just barely mind you, by your sore, gapeing butthole... BOHICA!

603239_420392028021683_1681111662_n.jpg
 

budlover13

King Tut
This type of reaction baffles me.

Do you know the requirements as stated in the Constitution needed to go above an amendment?

The president doesn't have the power to pass an executive order to abolish any amendments. Nobody is behind the scenes getting charged up and coming for your guns. Even if restrictions were passed, your guns, the ones you own right now, would be safe from the rule. Do people really think the government has the resources/ability to do a sweep of the entire country and start confiscating guns?

...Really?
The US government does not need to confiscate firearms. That's part of what the UN is for from my understanding.
 

budlover13

King Tut
my brethren? ya mean, the guy who checks my groceries at the store when i got out?

anyone stupid enought o take up a battle they can't win is no brethren of mine. enough with the internet revolutionary nonsense, tough guy.
If they think they can't win it, they've already lost.
 

budlover13

King Tut
People always gripe that the forefathers never conceived of modern weapons. They are likely right. But if our forefathers saw a full-auto/selective fire AR, they would've named it specifically in the 2nd ;)
 

budlover13

King Tut
you can fight off the united states army, but only if you have 33 round clips instead of 10 round clips?

how the hell did our founding fathers win the revolution then?

edit: gonna start trimming now, have fun.
WTF do you know that I don't? I WANT those 3 extra rounds! :wall:
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The US government does not need to confiscate firearms. That's part of what the UN is for from my understanding.
Nobody can confiscate American firearms. No organization has the ability/authority/resources to do so. Like I said, it would take a sweep of over 90 MILLION homes, do you know how long that would take, how expensive it would be, and how inefficient of a plan that is?

I guarantee, for every 1 firearm confiscated, 9 wouldn't be. Good luck..
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
The US government does not need to confiscate firearms. That's part of what the UN is for from my understanding.
what do you take the USA for . . .a bunch of frenchies . . . . . i kid. but still congress wouldnt let the UN police its citizens

we come from the country where we pass laws to assassinate anyone in the world . . . . .the UN aint gonna touch shit
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
Nobody can confiscate American firearms. No organization has the ability/authority/resources to do so. Like I said, it would take a sweep of over 90 MILLION homes, do you know how long that would take, how expensive it would be, and how inefficient of a plan that is?

I guarantee, for every 1 firearm confiscated, 9 wouldn't be. Good luck..
the us population is the biggest army, i love it
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Exactly, 90 million households with weapons, what the fuck is the UN going to do about that? Jack shit. That's what.

The American population could reasonably expect to win a war waged against most militarized nations, the only thing that could take everyones guns away is the US government, and more than half the service members of the US military would stand against such an order.

I'm not even sure who would support repealing or even restricting the 2nd amendment, there's no lobby in existence big or powerful enough to even make a dent in such a policy.

All this "they're gonna take my guns!" bullshit is nothing but hyperbole, and more of exactly what the media is good at, exaggeration.

Your guns are safe, trust me..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
...the only thing that could take everyones guns away is the US government, and more than half the service members of the US military would stand against such an order...
citation for that?

even stanley mcchrystal says there is no need for civilians to own AR15s. they are weapons designed for war, taking people out en masse and as efficiently as possible.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
citation for that?

even stanley mcchrystal says there is no need for civilians to own AR15s. they are weapons designed for war, taking people out en masse and as efficiently as possible.
In this case, I feel like I don't need a citation, although you and I both know no such citation exists.


People who are drawn to the military are likely gun enthusiasts, hell, a lot of them join to "blow shit up", not to diminish their reputation, but that's the exact demographic that supports the 2nd amendment. Ask any person inside the military if weapons should be banned for American citizens, likely, and I'd be willing to bet, more than 90% of them would say no.

I've personally spoken to people in the military, and this is one of the strongest issues.

Trying to take guns away from Americans would be like trying to take heroin away from junkies only harder because with guns there's an amendment in which 3/4 of the states would have to systematically oppose, that is, 225 MILLION people..

Again, your guns are safe!..
 
Top