How many innocent lives are your guns worth?

Doer

Well-Known Member
All it takes to meet your wishes is do not be the person that supports or initiates aggression against others. If I were a genie, you would now have 2 more wishes.
Damn, I wish these genies weren't so tricky....woopps! Do over, Do over!
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Let's put it this way. If I had a Phaser set to stun, and it worked 100%, I'd have no reason whatsoever to set it to kill. And I would not.

But, if the govt did not let me have a kill setting that would be infringement, if those were the Arms of the day.

In that case, I would favor a contemplative lock out, to make it a conscious, yet very illegal act, to set it to kill. An ipso facto proof of intent to kill.

But, no lock for stun, open carry etc. Lots of laws already about when and how to use stun gun or pepper spray, for example, which I'm never without.
I want a phaser with an annoy setting...

Oh wait, we already have those, they are called super squirter's...
 

Figong

Well-Known Member
brazilian chile resin-based gel in a super soaker would be 2mil+ scoville units.. your eyes would be on fire for many many hours, and that'd be after a head soak in milk and a hospital eye flush + tear ducts flushed too.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
When somebody "asks" a person to do something, it implies they may do it or not without fear of a consequence. When you use the word "ask" above what you really should say is "demand". Government wordsmithing has crept into the standard lexicon, let's not help them out by allowing them to recreate the meanings of words eh?
hey now... dont talk bad about semantics!
 

Figong

Well-Known Member
Update: Here's 1 for both directions:

Facing your place, culprit house to the right: 3MR8Bhr.png

Facing your place, culprit house to the left: KosBJx6.png

Enjoy!
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Only 1, and have to change the arrow direction.. I may mod it this evening and have both downloadable incase you need 2 yourself. :)
unless you use it on somebody who enjoys Thai food, Szechuan cuisine, real Mexican cooking, Cajun food, or punjab curries.

then your weapon is only gonna make them hungry.
 

Figong

Well-Known Member
unless you use it on somebody who enjoys Thai food, Szechuan cuisine, real Mexican cooking, Cajun food, or punjab curries.

then your weapon is only gonna make them hungry.
hahahahahahaha, completely awesome - good twist!
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
FUCK SEMANTICS!

according to Canndo, semantics are all thats important since without semantics "words have no meaning"

in the minds of agenda driven political whores, words are formless and can be twisted to suit your desired results.

and if a word or phrase becomes too burdened with meaning, then you simply invent a new word, use that new hotness for the purposes which support your agenda, and the old worn out word can be hung around the opposition's neck like an albatross.

which is why layoffs became "outsourcing" which became "downsizing" which became "rightsizing" and will some become something new, perhaps "happy-fun-time-sizing"

but when you are opposed to the employer, its still "layoffs" and "pinkslips" and "throwing workers into the streets"

sematic word-gamers like canndo dont believe anything is real, they are lost in a cartesian dilemma, and everything is smoke and oakum, everything reshapes itself with the slightest breeze and nothing remains but their agenda which is immutable and inviolate.

thats why he feels confident in making the same stupid arguments over and over again.
 

Figong

Well-Known Member
FUCK SEMANTICS!

according to Canndo, semantics are all thats important since without semantics "words have no meaning"

in the minds of agenda driven political whores, words are formless and can be twisted to suit your desired results.

and if a word or phrase becomes too burdened with meaning, then you simply invent a new word, use that new hotness for the purposes which support your agenda, and the old worn out word can be hung around the opposition's neck like an albatross.

which is why layoffs became "outsourcing" which became "downsizing" which became "rightsizing" and will some become something new, perhaps "happy-fun-time-sizing"

but when you are opposed to the employer, its still "layoffs" and "pinkslips" and "throwing workers into the streets"

sematic word-gamers like canndo dont believe anything is real, they are lost in a cartesian dilemma, and everything is smoke and oakum, everything reshapes itself with the slightest breeze and nothing remains but their agenda which is immutable and inviolate.

thats why he feels confident in making the same stupid arguments over and over again.
Ahh yes, good ole' Bullshit Bingo! bullshit_69bb79_880739.jpg
 

Figong

Well-Known Member
I shall play a round of Bullshit Bingo with that card, for the hell of it.

#1: The bottom line, we need to leave our investors out of the loop, packing a mindset that is win-win, empowering (Bullshit!) a synergy of quality driven leverage-based products with available bandwidth. (Bullshit!)
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Ahh yes, good ole' Bullshit Bingo! View attachment 2496458
I prefer to shift the paradigms, implementing a sea-change in the corporate culture.
By fundamentally refocusing our customer interface we can improve product throughput without negatively impacting our workforce dynamics.
We must remain ever mindful of the cultural sensitivity found in our community-focused out-reach programs to further enhance our X-Factor.
Only by endeavoring to persevere and continually exceeding expectations can we maintain our uptick in outside the box thinking.

and that, gentlemen, is something we can all agree on.
 

Figong

Well-Known Member
I prefer to shift the paradigms, implementing a sea-change in the corporate culture.
By fundamentally refocusing our customer interface we can improve product throughput without negatively impacting our workforce dynamics.
We must remain ever mindful of the cultural sensitivity found in our community-focused out-reach programs to further enhance our X-Factor.
Only by endeavoring to persevere and continually exceeding expectations can we maintain our uptick in outside the box thinking.

and that, gentlemen, is something we can all agree on.
Genius, sheer genius. :D
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
I prefer to shift the paradigms, implementing a sea-change in the corporate culture.
By fundamentally refocusing our customer interface we can improve product throughput without negatively impacting our workforce dynamics.
We must remain ever mindful of the cultural sensitivity found in our community-focused out-reach programs to further enhance our X-Factor.
Only by endeavoring to persevere and continually exceeding expectations can we maintain our uptick in outside the box thinking.

and that, gentlemen, is something we can all agree on.
You could make 6 figures as a project manager easy. This is pretty much every managers meeting I've ever had. All you need is an important sounding job title and you are gold.

Chief Science Officer probably already pays well though.
 
Top