FinShaggy's BeanSprouts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Even at BASE wattage it would be 135w, for it to be 158w there would have to basically be NO multiplier. And that is only like 20w difference, so you're stupid.
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Plus 4x 24w T5 = a BASE wattage (without translation to actual output) of... 250-ish watts (that includes t5's AND CFLs). BASE watts. With the multiplier it's AT LEAST 600w.
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
:lol: What's the point in using fluorescents (besides heat management) if you're not going to actually count the equivalent wattage :dunce: The REASON you use CFL over Halo is because it gives you more ACTUALLY wattage power, for LESS Kilowatt Hours (Money/Cost/Enery). And the other bulbs are 2x 50w and 1x 35w, I just don't know what they translate to in ACTUAL output.
Click to expand...
wattage has nothing to do with amount of lumens produced at par light . . come on dude just admit you spoke to soon or out of ignorance

the amount of visible/useable light for your plants is dicated by the quality of the bulb and its components . .

wattage is a measurement of resistance and amps . . thats it
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
wattage has nothing to do with amount of lumens produced at par light . . come on dude jst admit you spoek to soon or out of ignorance
Click to expand...
I spoke to soon? This isn't MY point being argued THEY were the ones that said wattage mattered. I'm just saying it's equivalent :dunce: And I'm right :lol:
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
Plus 4x 24w T5 = a BASE wattage (without translation to actual output) of... 250-ish watts (that includes t5's AND CFLs). BASE watts. With the multiplier it's AT LEAST 600w.
Click to expand...
a bulb rated at 24 watts produces just that, with 120volts/ 1.35 amps= (4 x 24watts)96 watts is what that is rated at . . their is no multiplier for efficiency it still produces less lumens then a 100 watt HPS bulb

their is no multiplier tard . .. . .you are demonstrably and equivocally wrong as usual

as usual your finstanding of things makes you look foolish . . why is it you are unable to learn. fuck wiki has all this info, their is no excuse

Finshaggy said:
I spoke to soon? This isn't MY point being argued THEY were the ones that said wattage mattered. I'm just saying it's equivalent
And I'm right
Click to expand...
is right, thats you
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
a bulb rated at 24 watts produces just that, with 120volts/ 1.35 amps= (4 x 24watts)96 watts is what that is rated at . . their is no multiplier for efficiency it still produces less lumens then a 100 watt HPS bulb

their is no multiplier tard . .. . .you are demonstrably and equivocally wrong as usual

as usual your finstanding of things makes you look foolish . . why is it you are unable to learn. fuck wiki has all this info, their is no excuse



:dunce: is right, thats you
Click to expand...
I'm not comparing it to HPS like you are. There IS a multiplier for efficiency OR THE WHOLE FUCKING "GO GREEN" MOVEMENT WOULDN'T BE IN LOVE WITH CFL'S :dunce: :lol:
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
I'm not comparing it to HPS like you are. There IS a multiplier for efficiency OR THE WHOLE FUCKING "GO GREEN" MOVEMENT WOULDN'T BE IN LOVE WITH CFL'S :dunce: :lol:
Click to expand...
ya your comparing watts and applying multiplier scales to the rated wattage for no reasonable reason other then , you think thats what happens

you have no idea what you are even regurgitating, it is plainly obvious

its all amps, resistance and watts that is a blanket comparison to any light producing bulb, no matter watt(lol)

then its lumens and lux . . . .and the amount or range of par light emited

learn dunceman, i posted the info you...... attacked reality, not my fault if you cant figure it out, on your own,
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Blah Blah Blah. SamWell, you have stalked me for a year or more. I don't give a fuck about this argument. I'm gonna watch some Sons of Anarchy and post and update :lol:
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
stupid is as stupid does

anyone reading this thread will get the right info, you are null in void

im not arguing

im informing teaching, not speculating/ professing
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
I'm going to watch TV now. Please keep bumping my thread though, and if you're going to post pictures, make some original meme's. Ya'll crack yourselves up all the time, I'm sure you can think of something :)
 
Mechanical

Mechanical

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
I'm not comparing it to HPS like you are. There IS a multiplier for efficiency OR THE WHOLE FUCKING "GO GREEN" MOVEMENT WOULDN'T BE IN LOVE WITH CFL'S :dunce: :lol:
Click to expand...
Spoke to soon again.. CFL's last longer, use less wattage which means less energy to run them, and ONE incandescent in every home produces the same greenhouse gas as 800,000 cars. Go Green!!
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
5-10 days till flower, lol, but your worried about them not being tall enough for your halo gen and a 1k bulb . . have you even hooked up the one k to see how hot it gets in there yet?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top