cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
^^ Still not sure I get it, Heis. Would you post an analogy using strippers?![]()
They won't show you the one who is the Tuckmaster. cn
^^ Still not sure I get it, Heis. Would you post an analogy using strippers?![]()
The fact that he has a daughter already doesn't have any bearing on the odds of his second child being a female. 50/50 chance of it being a female.This is going to sound similar to a previous one, but pay attention.
You meet an old friend on the bus. He tells you he has two children. One is a girl born on a Friday. What are the odds that your friend has two daughters?
No trick of words or logic, I just want to know the mathematical chance based on the information given.
The fact that he has a daughter already doesn't have any bearing on the odds of his second child being a female. 50/50 chance of it being a female.
This would be correct if the question was, what are the chances of the second child being a girl. The question is, given what you know, what are the chances he has two daughters.
See this post for a previous similar question and answer.
There's a total of four outcomes for the two pregnancy's. Two outcomes for the first and two for the second. 1/2 x 1/2= 1/4 or .25%
50%I am inclined to agree with your logic, though you need to take it a step further and eliminate the boy/boy outcome, so 1/3 chance.
But alas that is not the answer this time because it doesn't account for all the information given...
I didn't mean to imply that the first born was a girl, though I see I have inadvertently suggested that in my response to BB.
We know he has two children, one of the children is female born on a Friday.
We don't need to know who was born first, only that a child was specifically identified. We can just call her Friday. Friday has 100% chance of being a girl. The other child has a 50% chance, which is the same as the odds that both are girls. I don't see how 2:3 would work, but if that's the right answer, please detail.I didn't mean to imply that the first born was a girl, though I see I have inadvertently suggested that in my response to BB.
We know he has two children, one of the children is female born on a Friday.
I don't see that as a valid assumption. It could have been, "I have one girl, born on a Friday, and the other girl also happened to be born on a Friday." We only have information about one girl, it doesn't eliminate anything about the second child.I'll give this a whack. i am reading the setup to say that the other is not a girl born on a Friday.
I don't see that as a valid assumption. It could have been, "I have one girl, born on a Friday, and the other girl also happened to be born on a Friday." We only have information about one girl, it doesn't eliminate anything about the second child.
Well lets back up a bit. The chance that any man who has sired two children will have two daughters is 1/4. Each birth has a 1/2 chance of being female. 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. The possibilities are , MM, MF, FM, FF. Since we know at least one event resulted in female, we eliminate the MM, leaving us with 1/3 chance of the man having two daughters.
Now we are given additional information. The female was born on a Friday. Do we need to adjust our calculations to account for this new information, or is it irrelevant? Do the odds change?
I'll give a little more time before I reveal the answer.
I would say No. The man volunteered that the girl was born on a Friday, discharging any selection bias for that day.
These father/child problems make me say Uncle. cn
If that is so, I'll say two out of three.You are on the right track, but as MP said, you can not make any assumptions about the other child. It could be a boy or a girl, and could have been born on any day of the week.
Okay, let's break down the number of possibilities. For g-b we have 7 distinct possibilities, the girl on a Friday and the boy on one of the 7 days.Well lets back up a bit. The chance that any man who has sired two children will have two daughters is 1/4. Each birth has a 1/2 chance of being female. 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. The possibilities are , MM, MF, FM, FF. Since we know at least one event resulted in female, we eliminate the MM, leaving us with 1/3 chance of the man having two daughters.
Now we are given additional information. The female was born on a Friday. Do we need to adjust our calculations to account for this new information, or is it irrelevant? Do the odds change?
I'll give a little more time before I reveal the answer.