Being a moderator makes your guardian angel no more accurate than you. Your studies are shit, your references are worse. You don't understand what linking to research
proving your point means. I don't give a shit about how it affects a rat's asshole when applied as a salve. You are the spreader of misinformation. You are pushing soft science, and YOU are giving advice that could lead to people's death or an increase in negative affects caused by illness.
Your magical "hash oil" isn't magical. And, it's not what is discussed in most of the "studies" you've posted. Again, references to references to an abstract is not supporting your argument.
Like this:
THC may be psychologically addictive and causes increased presentation of mental disorders.*
Citation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1124674/
Marijuana use by vulnerable youth increases odds of onset of depression:*
Citation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC135489/
Marijuana extract (CBD) linked to reduction in lung cancer cell growth, and significantly reduced tumor mass in mice.
Citation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22198381
These citations can all be followed, they give an abstract, the methods used, and the results. They are on topic, and are not from a pot forum, or youtube videos, but are published, pee-reviewed studies which have been found reliable enough to make it into the National Library of Medicine. Not a "research institute" with no accreditation, not a pro-marijuana board or website.
You claimed 100% cancer cure rate, from Hash oil. Now, prove it. Post UNBIASED PROOF of that, or YOU are the spreader of misinformation, and a propagandist of the worst kind, one which exploits the sick, the ill, the mentally deficient. You are no different than the voodoo surgeons of Mexico and the Bahamas that promise magical cures, but leave you for dead, instead.
I don't give a shit if you have studies showing that weed makes your dick glow purple in a good way, and increases I.Q. by 200%. Those weren't your initial claims, 100% cure was your claim.
*First two studies I could grab, there are a lot more. I'm just trying you how to cite a valid source.