Will America fall eventually?

a mongo frog

Well-Known Member
I could make money easy too if I talked about licking dick and ass in all my songs.

Or pole dancing. Or sucking dudes off for money.

But I only do that for my husband, because I am not a filthy whore.
U couldn't do shit. U r not going to make money talking about sucking off dudes. U might make a few bucks actually doing those deeds, but talking about it no fucking way. And the sad part is u probably fucked more dudes than she has. And she has your bank account fucking crushed. If u don't believe me ask your husband. He will tell u " yes sweetie, mongo is right. She's a rock star, and u don't really do shit"
 

ANC

Well-Known Member
I read the feds just bought enough rounds of ammo to last 24 years of usage in Iraq.... for domestic use....
THINK THEY EXPECT SOMETHING?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/17/Feds-Buy-2-Billion-Rounds-Of-Ammunition


Law Enforcement Targets, Inc., a provider of shooting targets to the Department of Homeland Security, has admitted that targets depicting pregnant women were “requested” by law enforcement agencies.
As you can hear in the YouTube clip above, Blaine Cooper enquired about the company’s “no hesitation” targets, which also feature children, elderly gun owners and mothers in playgrounds, and was told that the target showing a pregnant woman was a “requested law enforcement target for training.”The representative refused to answer why police would be interested in training to shoot pregnant women, but went on to explain, “unfortunately our world is made up of people, pregnant or otherwise, that are gun owners not for the right reasons,” adding that the targets were to “train police officers”.

http://www.infowars.com/law-enforcement-requested-shooting-targets-of-pregnant-women/
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
U couldn't do shit. U r not going to make money talking about sucking off dudes. U might make a few bucks actually doing those deeds, but talking about it no fucking way. And the sad part is u probably fucked more dudes than she has. And she has your bank account fucking crushed. If u don't believe me ask your husband. He will tell u " yes sweetie, mongo is right. She's a rock star, and u don't really do shit"
Well then he would be with her and getting his ass licked.

No thankee. I have smelt wat comes outta there.
 

gioua

Well-Known Member
Fact is many of the colonies wouldn't of survived without the aid of the indians.

Not all of the colonies were puritans. Just one.

Jamestown was looking for gold, New England was exporting resources.

Most the colonies were backed by rich europeans looking to profit off the land.

well.. perhaps.. many of the colonies wouldn't of survived without the aid of the Indians... does that make it better or worse? was it survival of the fittest?
I dunno.. there are many historical records in which people survived w.o the Indians..


your presumption of the EU sending out folks here to profit from the land.. is EXACTLY what the Myans Aztec Inca's etc from S.A were doing.. but because their continent is connected this makes it less of a hostile take..


The S.A culture be it Myans Aztec Inca's (etc and there were many other less known cultures here in N.A)
were ALL paid to go forth and get stuff for their land and kingdoms..
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
The people that survived without the indians were the few. Most likely the wealthy.

People died from the winters in log cabins, sickness, and lack of food. New england were mainly farmers who didn't know how to hunt. Jamestown were soldiers who didn't know how to farm. And they were all living in those crappy log cabins. Poor folks didn't know straw was natures best insulator.

It was the indian introduction of corn, tomatos and root crops that improved the diet of the people. Cus wheat was really hard to grow in america. Also the indians taught the europeans how to fertilize and take care of farm land.

People with power push their will upon those without power. Just seems to be the history of the world.
 

gioua

Well-Known Member
The people that survived without the indians were the few. Most likely the wealthy.

People died from the winters in log cabins, sickness, and lack of food. New england were mainly farmers who didn't know how to hunt. Jamestown were soldiers who didn't know how to farm. And they were all living in those crappy log cabins. Poor folks didn't know straw was natures best insulator.

It was the indian introduction of corn, tomatos and root crops that improved the diet of the people. Cus wheat was really hard to grow in america. Also the indians taught the europeans how to fertilize and take care of farm land.

People with power push their will upon those without power. Just seems to be the history of the world.
only wealthy people live to make it then I guess?

I am screwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwed.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
other nations do you own a iPhone or IBM product lol

or maybe some j&J products

do you run windows or apple to talk shit about USA falling
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Well now that the standard of living in this country is so high.. we are basically all wealthy compared to the colonies. And most third world countries.

Our people with no income eat better than the people in the poor countries.
 

gioua

Well-Known Member
Well now that the standard of living in this country is so high.. we are basically all wealthy compared to the colonies. And most third world countries.

Our people with no income eat better than the people in the poor countries.

you saying it's a win, win?
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Well... for us.. not so much for third world countries.

I would of rather been an indian than a early colony person.
 
Top