common sense gun control, a solution looking for a problem

Not at all. What if you have a big yard, say 10 acres or so, all pretty level and cleared; the dogs let you know somethings up at the perimeter....still reaching for a pistol or trying to tell me that should be my only option based on your opinion? What if it's a deer and I'm hungry but my stupid 38 won't hit the broad side of a barn so I sneak down and spook him before I am in range. Thanks dude you just blew dinner. jk but everyone's different ya know?

if you can't kill a deer with a gun, that's sad.

Heller just upheld my right to own whatever I want as long as I use it for lawful purposes I reckon.

ummmm, might want to check that again.
 
how many times do you find yourself in grave danger at 800 yards in civilian life?

you are only making the case for what i am saying now. there are weapons meant for military use, and weapons meant for civilian use.

why do you think jared loughner changed out mags that still had rounds in them between each classroom so that he had a full high capacity mag for each classroom? makes it easier and more efficient to slaughter kindergarteners, gives them less time to run away when changing mags, that simple.

thanks for making my case for me though.

Good deflection on your lack of firearm knowledge. Also ironic that a retard who doesn't own a gun would lecture law abiding former servicemen about the need for them to relinquish their weapons for the safety of the children.

You also get extra marks for hitting the talking points time and time again... I think it was you that said "If you cant dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit".

All you need now is a classroom full of kids behind you while you practice that misdirection o'dogz has taught you so well.
 
Good deflection on your lack of firearm knowledge. Also ironic that a retard who doesn't own a gun would lecture law abiding former servicemen about the need for them to relinquish their weapons for the safety of the children.

You also get extra marks for hitting the talking points time and time again... I think it was you that said "If you cant dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit".

All you need now is a classroom full of kids behind you while you practice that misdirection o'dogz has taught you so well.

when did i say anything about anyone relinquishing their weapons?

you're not doing yourself any favors by lying, ya know.
 
if you can't kill a deer with a gun, that's sad.



ummmm, might want to check that again.

Killed and skinned way more than you I promise BOY.

As to Heller, smacked down the notion the 2nd amendment only pertained to the militia and guns are for personal use, I can see why you have so many posts lol.
 
Killed and skinned way more than you I promise BOY.

As to Heller, smacked down the notion the 2nd amendment only pertained to the militia and guns are for personal use, I can see why you have so many posts lol.

lol @ boy. guess i touched a nerve there, didn't i? you a shitty hunter? just go out there and get soused to escape your obese wife or something? the reasons why that touched a nerve point to something like that.

you might want to check out everything else in the heller decision.
 
Lol no nerve touched I am way secure in my shooting and hunting abilities, my future wife is finer than frog's hair and we don't drink or have problems. She is my best friend and she is a great shot! My boy comment is more for your unfocused argument...you have addressed nothing I have said except Heller. You just said it would be sad if I couldn't hit a deer with a handgun which is just reaching and showing your ignorance in firearms and their purpose. I was just using the deer with a handgun as an example of why your argument holds no sand.....Did you know that hunting large game with handguns is mostly illegal?

As to Heller could you point to any specifics from the case decision that would serve to uphold any future firearms bans in the District of Columbia or elsewhere?
 
when did i say anything about anyone relinquishing their weapons?

you're not doing yourself any favors by lying, ya know.

All the bullshit you hype up regarding the use of long arms for hunting and the constant questioning of a law abiding citizens firearm choice would put you firmly in the category.
 
lol @ boy. guess i touched a nerve there, didn't i? you a shitty hunter? just go out there and get soused to escape your obese wife or something? the reasons why that touched a nerve point to something like that.

you might want to check out everything else in the heller decision.

HAHA from a guy that makes his old lady take a second job so he can sit around and play on the internet all night.
 
HAHA from a guy that makes his old lady take a second job so he can sit around and play on the internet all night.

second job? had no idea that the school was paying her. last time i checked, i was forking over several thousand to them for her tuition.

trying to deflect away from your neverending 16 hour days installing greese traps?
 
Lol no nerve touched I am way secure in my shooting and hunting abilities, my future wife is finer than frog's hair and we don't drink or have problems. She is my best friend and she is a great shot! My boy comment is more for your unfocused argument...you have addressed nothing I have said except Heller. You just said it would be sad if I couldn't hit a deer with a handgun which is just reaching and showing your ignorance in firearms and their purpose. I was just using the deer with a handgun as an example of why your argument holds no sand.....Did you know that hunting large game with handguns is mostly illegal?

As to Heller could you point to any specifics from the case decision that would serve to uphold any future firearms bans in the District of Columbia or elsewhere?

don't believe i ever mentioned anything about citywide firearm bans.

congrats on wifing your lady though :eyesmoke:
 
Dude the pathetic thing there is she actually stands for that and by him.

Oh that shit always runs its course, it will hit him like a hammer when she declares she has been fucking her teacher/boss/his best friend. Losers always have loose wives and most if the time they don't even know it.
 
second job? had no idea that the school was paying her. last time i checked, i was forking over several thousand to them for her tuition.

And how are you paying for that might I ask?

Furthermore, you can get a degree now as a testicle drainage technician? For $7gs you could do the course too... It would help you out heaps in sanfran...
 
Oh that shit always runs its course, it will hit him like a hammer when she declares she has been fucking her teacher/boss/his best friend. Losers always have loose wives and most if the time they don't even know it.

LOL... Honestly LOL... The icing on the cake would be when she tells him it was a bigoted southerner with poor dental hygiene.
 
Well if we're going off of military firepower, a .308 has much more firepower than a small .223 round, so why not ban hunting rifles? The reason we have a constitution and specifically the 2nd amendment is to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government; if gun rights start to wither, will they stop there. Or will free speech be next? Or maybe the 4th amendment so that the government can "keep us safer" by kicking down doors of anyone they suspect of doing a crime and search their home without due process and a proper warrant?
Its to protect us from the government and to insure that we can shoot Buck without having to be too close to him :twisted:
 
Oh that shit always runs its course, it will hit him like a hammer when she declares she has been fucking her teacher/boss/his best friend. Losers always have loose wives and most if the time they don't even know it.

no doubt that you speak from personal experience. that explains very nicely why you only dark triad fat and ugly chicks nowadays.

And how are you paying for that might I ask?

in cash.
 
Back
Top