Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

[st0wandgrow]

if in fact you receive a DETAILED ANALYSIS why did you claim it was just a report on "dissolved solids"

does making deceptive comments and pretending ignorance so you can later declare how awesome you are on a pot forum help you forget about your microphallus?

as usual you have decided to pretend that an analogy is beyond your comprehension, and seek to sidetrack the argument with picayune bitching over irrelevant details and pointless ad-hominems.

you want everything labeled, but you couldnt even label your RO water as free of contamination by your standards and you admit such, yet we still have to have more motherfucking labels to satisfy your petulant demands.

way to be a moron.

NOTHING is safe, and you know this, NOTHING is pure and you know this too, yet you persist inn demanding more and more pointless labels knowing full well that the only purpose those labels would serve is to create the illusion of hazard.

i guess we should assume that you have NO IDEA that your dumbass labels would be nothing but fearmongering, and would simply be translated in the minds of the moron populace from "GMO" to "POISON".

yeah, you clearly dont know anything about deception, and clearly have no idea that "labeling" is just a shortcut for the clowns who know they cant get a ban on GMO's based on SCIENCE.

so ill close out in a manner you can understand, whether you're playing dumb or pretending intelligence:

EAT A DICK.

LOL!! "picayune bitching"

What an impressive vocabulary, cowpoke.

 

[ChesusRice]

LOL!! "picayune bitching"

What an impressive vocabulary, cowpoke.

Have to agree. The only reason you want labeling is to imply hazard, when there is none

 

[Someacdude]

if in fact you receive a DETAILED ANALYSIS why did you claim it was just a report on "dissolved solids"

does making deceptive comments and pretending ignorance so you can later declare how awesome you are on a pot forum help you forget about your microphallus?

as usual you have decided to pretend that an analogy is beyond your comprehension, and seek to sidetrack the argument with picayune bitching over irrelevant details and pointless ad-hominems.

you want everything labeled, but you couldnt even label your RO water as free of contamination by your standards and you admit such, yet we still have to have more motherfucking labels to satisfy your petulant demands.

way to be a moron.

NOTHING is safe, and you know this, NOTHING is pure and you know this too, yet you persist inn demanding more and more pointless labels knowing full well that the only purpose those labels would serve is to create the illusion of hazard.

i guess we should assume that you have NO IDEA that your dumbass labels would be nothing but fearmongering, and would simply be translated in the minds of the moron populace from "GMO" to "POISON".

yeah, you clearly dont know anything about deception, and clearly have no idea that "labeling" is just a shortcut for the clowns who know they cant get a ban on GMO's based on SCIENCE.

so ill close out in a manner you can understand, whether you're playing dumb or pretending intelligence:

EAT A DICK.

And take Franks picture down, your not worthy.

 

[Doer]

still waiting for those 128 studies . . ..

one Orwellian move to another . . . . .apparently labeling is just to much . .for these companies who create new foods . . .

politicians says its cool . . . winning

Only you say it is new food. WE looked at it and WE say it is not. It is the same. Self rule.

 

[Doer]

oh ok. .so the general consensus is . . do what your told . . . and obey any law no matter what . .got it . . .

You are free to dis-obey. That is not the subject. WE do have penalties if WE catch you.

 

[Samwell Seed Well]

a ha the level of butthurt is impressive . . you even started your own thread for validation .....

 

[echelon1k1]

Only you say it is new food. WE looked at it and WE say it is not. It is the same. Self rule.

Who's WE? the FDA?

 

[Doer]

a ha the level of butthurt is impressive . . you even started your own thread for validation .....

See now you are spinning into playground and exhibiting homophobia. You think you hurt my feeling or you think you reamed me?

Why do I need validation when this thread was actually closed as spam for a time today? I can move that all here if you like.

The thread was reopened, Sophie.

 

[Samwell Seed Well]

does if hurt that bad . .wow . . .well you did it to yourself . . .. WE decided. Self rule.

it was down for less then 15 mIn . . .is your anus that starved for attention . .

 

[Doer]

Who's WE? the FDA?

I'm sorry. Just an abbreviation, of course. WE the People.

It is a little know fact that the election of a critter is just the beginning of understanding the will of voters.

Every member is contacted constantly by WE. I have been trying to find out a number that would say how many times per year per member do they get email? Or a handwritten fax. Just two avenues right?

I think this is what we don't understand about self rule. Vote and forget.

There are millions of people pestering these folks every day. That is the job. Money does not buy the votes. Votes are traded for votes and other considerations. What is the will? Very deadly to ignore it.

Money buys access in person. But, I pester them for free. Self rule is for that. Write your Congress. They need to hear it.

 

[Trousers]

a ha the level of butthurt is impressive . . you even started your own thread for validation .....

Were you able to unlock the secrets behind internet links?
Is that pesky scientific method still pissing you off?

 

[Trousers]

Sam has had a hard on for me for quite a while. I never understood why.
Now he seems to be obsessed with Doer.

The flightiness of youth I guess.

 

[Doer]

Sorry, Charlie. Starkist has more taste.

 

[st0wandgrow]

Have to agree. The only reason you want labeling is to imply hazard, when there is none

No. I want to know what's in my food. I also want to know if it's been genetically modified. Why not leave the decision making up to the individual? If you feel it's safe and have no issue with it, then dig in. If I choose not to eat a product because it's gmo, then what's the rub?

Also, you don't know that there is "no hazard". Thus far there is nothing conclusive to suggest that there is, but that's a pretty small sample size. This is the same company that assured us that agent orange was a safe defoliant, and decades later we have hundreds of thousands of fucked up vets that were exposed to it.

 

[Doer]

does if hurt that bad . .wow . . .well you did it to yourself . . .. WE decided. Self rule.

it was down for less then 15 mIn . . .is your anus that starved for attention . .

No but I would say you are afraid of being seen as gay.

 

[Doer]

No. I want to know what's in my food. I also want to know if it's been genetically modified. Why not leave the decision making up to the individual? If you feel it's safe and have no issue with it, then dig in. If I choose not to eat a product because it's gmo, then what's the rub?

Also, you don't know that there is "no hazard". Thus far there is nothing conclusive to suggest that there is, but that's a pretty small sample size. This is the same company that assured us that agent orange was a safe defoliant, and decades later we have hundreds of thousands of fucked up vets that were exposed to it.

What about mammal feces and hunta virus? There has never been shown any evidence that can't be transmitted into our food.

 

[Sire Killem All]

jus pop in for this... http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-30/japan-halts-some-u-s-wheat-imports-on-gene-altered-crops.html..... i say no to any GMO label it, shit i can even get any good ole' TRANS FAT anymore wtf.

 

[Trousers]

No. I want to know what's in my food. I also want to know if it's been genetically modified.

This has been covered and you still do not understand it.
The government can not force labels that imply a hazard when there is no hazard.
If you want to change that, call your congressman.
If you want to avoid GMO, buy organic and shop at Whole Foods.

Remember when you implied that I was dumb? that was pretty funny.

Why not leave the decision making up to the individual?

The government can not force labels that imply a hazard when none exists.

If you feel it's safe and have no issue with it, then dig in. If I choose not to eat a product because it's gmo, then what's the rub?

There is none. Why do you want to force labels that imply a hazard where none exists?
By your logic, we will have to mandate the labeling of a lot of things. One of them is carrots. Eat too many carrots and you can hurt your self. drink too much water and you could die. these are facts, not paranoid dreams.

Also, you don't know that there is "no hazard".

Then prove there is a hazard. You also said you didn't care if they were healthy or not.
Change your mind about that?

Thus far there is nothing conclusive to suggest that there is, but that's a pretty small sample size.

Over 600 studies some dating back to the 1980s is a pretty good body of evidence.
Why didn't one of those studies find the problems GMO haters are imagining?

This is the same company that assured us that agent orange was a safe defoliant, and decades later we have hundreds of thousands of fucked up vets that were exposed to it.

That is completely irrelevant and a dumb appeal to emotion.
You are arguing like a politician, avoiding reality.


Monsanto does not have the market on GMO cornered. Check out Golden Rice and tell me what their motives are.

 

[ChesusRice]

This has been covered and you still do not understand it.
The government can not force labels that imply a hazard when there is no hazard.
If you want to change that, call your congressman.
If you want to avoid GMO, buy organic and shop at Whole Foods.

Remember when you implied that I was dumb? that was pretty funny.




The government can not force labels that imply a hazard when none exists.




There is none. Why do you want to force labels that imply a hazard where none exists?
By your logic, we will have to mandate the labeling of a lot of things. One of them is carrots. Eat too many carrots and you can hurt your self. drink too much water and you could die. these are facts, not paranoid dreams.



Then prove there is a hazard. You also said you didn't care if they were healthy or not.
Change your mind about that?



Over 600 studies some dating back to the 1980s is a pretty good body of evidence.
Why didn't one of those studies find the problems GMO haters are imagining?




That is completely irrelevant and a dumb appeal to emotion.
You are arguing like a politician, avoiding reality.


Monsanto does not have the market on GMO cornered. Check out Golden Rice and tell me what their motives are.

Yeah well
Vaccines cause Autism
I have junk science studies from the best aromatherapy and homeopaths to back up my assertion
Your 600 studies were all done by intellectual elites that were peer reviewed
Screw you and your bogus double blind studies

 

[st0wandgrow]

What about mammal feces and hunta virus? There has never been shown any evidence that can't be transmitted into our food.

Are the manufactures purposefully adding that to their product? No, they wouldn't be. So why on earth would they have to put that on the label? Give your head a shake.