Pullag poll: Should the US intervene in Syria?

[UncleBuck]

Not my fault you're too stupid to grasp a simple concept such as jihadist infiltration...

so you're still sticking with the theory that the muslim brotherhood spent decades infiltrating the egyptian military only to oust their own president and then kill hundreds of their own members.

that's cute.

 

[UncleBuck]

If they are no threat then what authority does the president have to lob a few missiles? I fear you have painted yourself in a corner, you must have missed the press conference.

you must have missed where retaliatory action is mandatory in the face of chemical weapons attacks like this on one's own people, and the part where obama can convene congress if he wants.

he'll probably just go ahead and lob a few missiles anyway in an allied effort, and you'll cry like a little baby for no reason whatsoever besides the fact that your vagina aches.

 

[abandonconflict]

you must have missed where retaliatory action is mandatory in the face of chemical weapons attacks like this on one's own people, and the part where obama can convene congress if he wants.

he'll probably just go ahead and lob a few missiles anyway in an allied effort, and you'll cry like a little baby for no reason whatsoever besides the fact that your vagina aches.

Has Obama ever done anything that you disapprove of? I'll remind you that you support this warlike US posturing, just in case you seem ashamed of it later.

 

[UncleBuck]

Has Obama ever done anything that you disapprove of?

there's a long list.

I'll remind you that you support this warlike US posturing, just in case you seem ashamed of it later.

this one is out of our hands.

when someone uses WMDs against their own people like this, retaliatory action is mandatory.

i'd be ashamed if we sat idly by while someone gassed thousands of their own people.

 

[ilikecheetoes]

but saddam killing kurds was ok? it must be hard changing your morality every time theres a new president.

 

[abandonconflict]

there's a long list.



this one is out of our hands.

when someone uses WMDs against their own people like this, retaliatory action is mandatory.

i'd be ashamed if we sat idly by while someone gassed thousands of their own people.

You should be ashamed for parroting bullshit talking points.

 

[abandonconflict]

a UN treaty is not a talking point.

I disagree. It makes a perfect talking point in my opinion. I'm also of the opinion that Peruvian cocaine is fucking awesome.

when someone uses WMDs against their own people like this, retaliatory action is mandatory.

^^Now that IS a talking point!!!

 

[echelon1k1]

there's a long list.



this one is out of our hands.

when someone uses WMDs against their own people like this, retaliatory action is mandatory.

i'd be ashamed if we sat idly by while someone gassed thousands of their own people.

No worries, well add "AQ sympathiser" to your list of shortcomings...

 

[ilikecheetoes]

mmm tasty ad hominem. accurate but not very painful.

 

[ginwilly]

there's a long list.



this one is out of our hands.

when someone uses WMDs against their own people like this, retaliatory action is mandatory.

i'd be ashamed if we sat idly by while someone gassed thousands of their own people.

but if we bomb brown people it's a hate crime

seriously though, do you think Obama should lob a few missiles or should he ask congress for permission first? should the UN be consulted before we bomb? Why has GB and France already taken parliamentary action but congress hasn't been called?

How do we know it was Assad who gassed the people? what does he gain from it? are there others who would gain from it more to make it look like Assad?

Did you believe Powell when he declared irrefutable evidence? Do you believe Gore now?

I'll never understand the logic behind the left sometimes. They killed over 100thousand and not a peep about sitting idly by. I heard Matthews calling for action saying "not even Hitler used chemical weapons". WTF Chris? gas chambers?

 

[echelon1k1]

when someone uses WMDs against their own people like this, retaliatory action is mandatory.

i'd be ashamed if we sat idly by while someone gassed thousands of their own people.

translating:

 

[abandonconflict]

 

[UncleBuck]

I disagree. It makes a perfect talking point in my opinion. I'm also of the opinion that Peruvian cocaine is fucking awesome.


^^Now that IS a talking point!!!

it's a UN treaty, not a talking point.

but if we bomb brown people it's a hate crime

seriously though, do you think Obama should lob a few missiles or should he ask congress for permission first? should the UN be consulted before we bomb? Why has GB and France already taken parliamentary action but congress hasn't been called?

How do we know it was Assad who gassed the people? what does he gain from it? are there others who would gain from it more to make it look like Assad?

Did you believe Powell when he declared irrefutable evidence? Do you believe Gore now?

there are just no words for this level of stupid.

 

[echelon1k1]

it's a UN treaty, not a talking point.



there are just no words for this level of stupid.

well explain it to us mr penn state dropout...

 

[UncleBuck]

No worries, well add "AQ sympathiser" to your list of shortcomings...

tell us more about how the muslim brotherhood spent decades infiltrating the egyptian military only to oust their own president and slaughter their own members, ausfalian.

better yet, tell us more about how you were part of the intelligence community taking down bin laden.



LOL!

go nurse your PTSD.

 

[abandonconflict]

You can tell when UB is seeing himself as effortlessly skating through the debate because he does these repetitive answers to two people in one post while keeping his point as narrow as possible.

 

[UncleBuck]

You can tell when UB is seeing himself as effortlessly skating through the debate because he does these repetitive answers to two people in one post while keeping his point as narrow as possible.

do you think it's OK for a government to serin gas thousands of its own people?

 

[abandonconflict]

do you think it's OK for a government to serin gas thousands of its own people?

Awwww


Look at UB play on my softness to get me to support a war that will result in an absolutely disgusting waste of human life and destruction of ancient cities. I don't believe you can wrap your mind around how big of a deal it is. I also don't believe the story. I don't believe Al Assad gassed his people. Even if he did, I still would not support Western intervention. The current situation is as much a result of US backing the rebels as it is of a Ba'athist being the Syrian president.

Despicable empire.

However, since I know it is valuable to you to hear this, I also don't believe Obama would commit us to nation building, nor would Hillary.

 

[echelon1k1]

tell us more about how the muslim brotherhood spent decades infiltrating the egyptian military only to oust their own president and slaughter their own members, ausfalian.

They did and it's well documented... Robert Baer has written extensively on this subject, he actually spoke at length about it during a conference in Sydney in 2010 that I attended.

I'll even give you a name synonymous with one of the most notorious MB/EIJ operatives the Egyptian and US military has produced; Ali Mohammed.

Oh and just to clarify, Mohammed Morsi IS NOT the president of the Muslim Brotherhood nor was he even first pick as Egypt's first "democratically" elected president.

better yet, tell us more about how you were part of the intelligence community taking down bin laden.

I never made that claim, but you did... BTW the story about the seals was just a cover, Australia killed UBL, we just don't want the heat

LOL! go nurse your PTSD.

Didn't think you could explain your position, doesn't surprise me you just parrot whatever jay carney spews...

 

[ginwilly]

do you think it's OK for a government to serin gas thousands of its own people?

Was it serin? Did it come from Iraq? would that justify "Iraq has WMD"?

Is it worse for a government to blow up 100k people or gas 1000?

Are you ever going to answer a direct question?