no, your paradigm is "my rights are sacred, the ones you value are worthless so im taking them away"
Is was or wasn't a reason? So what was the real reason it was written into the constitution? For stand my ground laws?
I agree "My rights are sacred" and I value them even through contempt......the babble is pragmatism, nothing totalitarian or exotic really..................."The greater good" is my impetus, I care like any other douchebag libtard......but I am tired of beating around the bush here. Arch conservatives are simply bad people. Yes, liberals are better because they care.......you can only use insults because you and all your crony's are just insensitive assholes. If Karma exists I would rather be right here. I am not a crybaby......you are not safer......I am cynical.......you are delusional. The tyranny that only a gun can remedy is laughable logically. Uncle Sam knocks and you????? I suggest fixations that include rights, just the ones that are relevant. Good luck.
I agree the times have changed. We don't have foreign troops quartered here, but we did.
. But, squads with ARs are a match for any unit's individual firepower.
We talked about this before. If you can't take the heat, go cool off. No one here will give you all that soft soap you crave. It is just words, and words can never hurt you. Stick and stones break bones. Not words.
Well, projectiles, right? Pellets, flechettes, balls, WP, 4 Phase Plasma, Laser beam, NegGrav Pulse. (nasty, tosses you into orbit)
Sometimes you say some sexy things!
...i'm with you man, it's rare to see such a family sized fool get something right, lol, i guess even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Yes, Sarcasm can run the full circle around into the Freudian truth.
Just photons from a screen, bro. Ain't no big thing. Just another plot by the Man to keep the brothers down.
I appreciate you looking out. I am happy as a clam really....and I am a grown up. They are just my words, if hardball is all certain minds can process than I am simply accommodating. No stress.
amazing, you spat all that crap out, yet still have not provided the mystical secret sutras which granted you the wisdom to declare Guns R Bad mmm'kay.
This is so wrong and sad. Havent you seen the movie 300, heard the story david and goliath, every enemy has a weakness, you just have to be cunning enough to figure out what it is. Tanks are not impenetrable. my guns will protect me from those driving the tank. Then i get a tank. We don't have legal ideas here, we have laws. Unless specifically designed to, laws do not expire, the constitution does not expire. I'm not sure you understand how our system is supposed to work.
Interesting spin on it, your opinions are good at looking true. I still think 300,000 people have died since guns were used by civilians to restore order here at home. Gun-nuts are the bastard children of a very violent American history and a good amount of irrational fear and racial tension. But the gun nuts are before anything simply consumers. Guns were cleverly put in the hands of all heroes on the silver screen cops, cowboys, war movies almost always had minority antagonists. Brilliant marketing and a scared population can produce any fanatic, not to mention guns are pretty exhilarating and release adrenaline when shot. The power and addiction one experiences is significant but they are here and now. The war between and armed populous and its' government in modern times is not going to restore the power grid, or our civilian communication networks. The strategy for the govt is not residential sweeps, it's no Call of Duty landscape, I speculate that if deprived of power, internet, water, and fresh food people become tyrannical against one and other. That high powered civilian arsenal is effective how in this situation? It seems a little hard to wrap my head around the right still as relevant as it once was. Please, I am trying to understand not take anything, I want to hear this tale play out the way you see it. I notice that gun-related homicide are a non issue for most gun people and wonder why that is? The darker side of widespread civilian ownership of powerful guns, ones that could fight in war, is worth acknowledging. A lot more dead people caught in the spray and ricochet and we owe them a good plausible reason. The Right to Bear Arms ends where? What point do we distinguish what arms anyone has the right to have? Which are both safe to the general public and highly destructive as needed in war. Bombs? Chemicals? Biological Arms should be our inalienable right. The Bill of Rights is not able to address this and these are alienable arms. Is this document still flawless, it leaves a lot of ambiguity and shows the illusion of its' basic tenet. Again, there are a lot of unanswered questions for people like me. There are delusions of how a modern revolt would be fought. I ask that those with opinions, facts, or additional perspective keep this clean exchange, we all need a break and let's talk. What is realistic, what is not, where do the changes need to happen......again please be respectful.I agree the times have changed. We don't have foreign troops quartered here, but we did.
Jefferson was the Grandaddy liberal, but he famously surmised that one day, the govt could become tyrannical, despite the best intentions. And the Founders knew there were already Anti-Con forces inside and out. See the President's Oath. It is the only one in the Constitution.
So, you can't stand up with a pea shooter, right. That's why you only want pea shooters.
The Cong had no air power, helicopter supplied fire bases, $Millions a day in ordinance. The Cong got our stuff and used it against us and won.
If you need weapons take them, says Che.
It is not the weapons that win the fight. It is the will alone that wins.
But, it is too insidious now. The idea that some internal Rebel Army stand up inside, and says OK, lets fight, is not it. So, Buck is correct in that way. Since this is a Federated Gang, no State can get out of the Union. So, an overthrow of the Federal govt has to be done by the States. It is not a Monarchy where you wave the severed head around and you are done.
If you tried to overthrow a State govt, the mutual aid kicks in and the Fed falls on the little problem and obliterates it.
No, really, guns were and are now mainly for the break down in civil order. Injuns, and French marauders. Crazy Texans running around. Mormons torching newspapers.
Guns are the strength of America. We can and do take matters into our own hands in self rule. WE guard while the Cops flee like in New Orleans, Watt, Harlem, Chicago, Detroit, Oakland, etc.
And there was not a gun nut culture until all the clamp down began. Think about that.
Guns were normal tools until the lying and handwaving emotion tamper that Buck and others fell for. That created the Gun Nut Culture.
Thank you, Libertard busybodies, do-gooders. Now there is a really crazy looking opposition, to your crazy looking opposition to a Constitutional Right.
No one understands backlash.
OK. Thank you. I had to break it into paragraphs to read it, but that is just my les-dixia or whatever it is called. And you are thinking not trolling, so let us go from that. We can go thru it in order of what I bolded above.Interesting spin on it, your opinions are good at looking true.(1) I still think 300,000 people have died since guns were used by civilians to restore order here at home. Gun-nuts are the bastard children of a very violent American history and a good amount of irrational fear and racial tension. But the gun nuts are before anything simply consumers. Guns were cleverly put in the hands of all heroes on the silver screen cops, cowboys, war movies almost always had minority antagonists.
(2)Brilliant marketing and a scared population can produce any fanatic, not to mention guns are pretty exhilarating and release adrenaline when shot. The power and addiction one experiences is significant but they are here and now. The war between and armed populous and its' government in modern times is not going to restore the power grid, or our civilian communication networks. The strategy for the govt is not residential sweeps, it's no Call of Duty landscape, I speculate that if deprived of power, internet, water, and fresh food people become tyrannical against one and other.
That high powered civilian arsenal is effective how in this situation? It seems a little hard to wrap my head around the right still as relevant as it once was. Please, I am trying to understand not take anything, I want to hear this tale play out the way you see it. I notice that(3) gun-related homicide are a non issue for most gun people and wonder why that is? The darker side of widespread (4) civilian ownership of powerful guns, ones that could fight in war, is worth acknowledging. A lot more dead people caught in the spray and ricochet and we owe them a good plausible reason. The Right to Bear Arms ends where? What point do we distinguish what arms anyone has the right to have? Which are both safe to the general public and highly destructive as needed in war. (5)Bombs? Chemicals? Biological Arms should be our inalienable right.
The Bill of Rights is not able to address this and these are alienable arms. Is this document (6)still flawless, it leaves a lot of ambiguity and shows the illusion of its' basic tenet. Again, there are a lot of unanswered questions for people like me. There are delusions of how a (7) modern revolt would be fought. I ask that those with opinions, facts, or additional perspective keep this clean exchange, we all need a break and let's talk. What is realistic, what is not, where do the (changes need to happen......again please be respectful.
