about 15 to 25 ft depending on which you have and then up close and personal just gets "stun"
DC Shooter and Obama Care?
- Thread starter Sand4x105
- Start date
about 15 to 25 ft depending on which you have and then up close and personal just gets "stun"
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
taser, axe, knife, and whatever other object i have sitting around (golf club, 2x4, etc) versus whoever is dumb enough to hop the fence and set off an alarm.
i do keep rope and duct tape handy as well.
nitro harley
Well-Known Member
I see Bucky wants a challenge...It doesn't surprise me that it is against a woman.....
D619
Well-Known Member
Wikipedia? Wrong! The 1997 Gun Law or not didnt and wouldn't have prevented the Massacre. To use Australia as an example is stupid! Misleading to say the least.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i saw a lot of pissy indignance, but no australian gun massacres.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Piers Morgan was bleating for hours that he used an AR15!!!
The newtown guy did not use guns he owned, hence any back ground checks would have been irrelevant. That, of course, is the point of background checks, they are meant to be harassment for the 99.9999% of people who use and own guns with no criminal intent. We all know they will have no effect on criminals, just look at Chicago. Back ground checks and the endless litany of "common sense gun control" laws are meant to make it so annoying and exasperating for American citizens to exercise their rights as free people that they will just give up and knuckle under to the knuckle dragging progressives who "really know best".
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Learn to write in English.
Racist.
By the way, you are ignorant of TASERs available to the public.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Sounds like a "kill kit", Bucky. You are not one of those serial killers stalking the pacific northwest, are you? Buck Bundy has a nice ring to it, though, I will have to admit that.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
who cares?
is anyone talking about piers morgan but you?
maybe mention al gore while you're at it, fully display that impotent, pissy rage of yours.
background checks prevented him from even trying to buy a gun on his own.
now if only his mom had heard of a locked safe.
but locking your guns away from your psycho son when you're not at home is too much of a hassle for the fear-filled, racist idiots of the world like you. freedom freedom liberty freedom persecution.
actually, they are meant to keep the mentally ill from buying guns, and make it tougher for criminals to buy a gun or carry one.
yes, let's look at chicago.
i bet it will provide a ton of examples of criminals getting busted for illegally purchased weapons.
my word, what a hassle this background check is!
can't they just hand out guns for free on the street corner to anyone with no check on that person's history of criminality, mental illness, or the like?
all this persecution of a routine background check. what persecution.
go cry now.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
white supremacists run amok on the forum for months, desert dude sits quiet. doesn't say a word about them.
white chick says something about "old white men" and he follows her around, calling her a racist.
i guess the only racism that exists in his world is the kind that happens against whites, perceived or real.
but he's totally not a racist.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
And if my self defense kit was an AR15 then my kit would statistically less deadly than yours. I feel you should be free to use the weapons of your choice to defend your life and family though, that would be pretentious and overlordish of me. Imagine the ego and delusional self importance of someone who feels they can tell others what they can and can't use to defend their family. I don't think we should ban knives and I believe you have a right to use one no matter how many more murders they are used in compared to ARs. I may suggest you use an AR instead of a knife, but I would never think I have the right to make it legally mandatory for you or take away your knife, that's insanity.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
tell me about all the mass murders that have been carried out with a small knife, taser, or axe.
an AR15 is a tool designed to kill as many people as quickly as possible. you can't chop wood with it, you can't slice an apple into neat wedges, and you can't use one at close range to temporarily stun an intruder.
they are meant for killing people en masse. they are military weapons, not civilian weapons.
if i was gonna get a gun for self defense, an AR15 would be about the last thing on my list.
edit: however, if i had a problem with invading mongols or wanted to take out aq classroom full of kindergarteners, the AR15 would be a great choice.
D619
Well-Known Member
You obviously do not have a clue about firearms or even ever handled one. Do you even know what AR means?
As the United States Defense Department’s Defense Intelligence Agency book Small Arms Identification and Operation Guide explains, “assault rifles” are “short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges.”[21] In other words, assault rifles are battlefield rifles which can fire automatically.[22]
Weapons capable of fully automatic fire, including assault rifles, have been regulated heavily in the United States since the National Firearms Act of 1934.[23] Taking possession of such weapons requires paying a $200 federal transfer tax and submitting to an FBI background check, including ten-print fingerprints.[24]
Despite what Joe dipshit B says, a double barrel shotgun for most women in general is a horrible defense weapon. And shooting warning shots from your balcony is a crime and would get you arrested and rightly so! Limiting a weapon to 10 rounds is pointless. Anyone who is trained with a firearm can reload another mag in less than a second. Now my weapon of choice for DEFENSE is my tried and true Mossberg 590 pump action shotgun. Backed up with my reliable 1911 45 ACP and my beautiful forged Katana.
D619
Well-Known Member
By the way for those that do not know. AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle, NOT " Assualt Rifle" military rifles are exactly that, designed for the Military, they are not AR15s use by civilians. A big difference, and one the anti-gun enthusiast are ignorant about or just plainly misleading the uninformed.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how many people and children did jared loughner shoot, how big was his mag, and how was he stopped?
this question works well for a copy and paste reply, which should be right up your ally.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you like copy and pastes, so here's one for ya.
The AR-15 was first built by*ArmaLite*as an*assault rifle*for the*United States armed forces.[SUP][8][/SUP]*
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so are hammers and clubs better killing tools? is the united states military gonna start equipping soldiers with hammers and clubs now?
is that the point you are trying to make?
for some stupid reason, mass murderers have been making AR15s and the like their killing tool of choice. not many successful mass murderers plying their trade with hammers and clubs. they should talk to you.
D619
Well-Known Member
you like to talk out of your ass, and it was not a copy and paste. Again Military use, AR15 in question that you like to call Assualt rifle are not classified as Assualt rifles use by civilians because its NOT an Assualt Rifle. Got it!
D619
Well-Known Member
My point, well your pathetic attempt to insinuate that military should be issued hammers and clubs based on my comment just shows me how much of a moron you are.,The military does NOT use AR15s that are used for civilians. semiautomatic handguns are far more prevalent in mass shootings. Have you shot an AR15? Probably not, you just want to keep up with your stupidness. And you called me the assclown. Too much.
