Are they re-balancing their portfolio?Any opinions on why the Fed decided not to taper purchasing?
Yes the Republicans are hoping the economy crashes. They have been doing everything in their power to make it happen for the last 5 yearsBubble, Bubble, We are really in F_ing Trouble. Smoke and Mirrors.
The worst part is there is nothing you can do about it.By the way ever wonder why the size of a bag of nacho chips has gotten smaller, yet costs the same.
When the currency supply expands, the real value of a dollar will decrease. It's part of the inflationary / robbery thing "they" have going on.
This is a cyclical bull market in a secular bear. All the news is "good" and the bull is now running on fumes, with the bear ready to resume. When the Fed floated its news trial balloon about "tapering", the market had an immediate convulsion. THAT is why the tapering idea got shitcanned. Fact is, they don't know what the fuck they are doing and perception is reality, as always, on Wall Street. Bernanke is trying to fill an ever-growing sinkhole but he isn't shoveling fast enough, nor can he or his soon-to-be-announced replacement ever do so. They are way out on a limb as it is.Any opinions on why the Fed decided not to taper purchasing?
I hear the economy is doing great, so it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
Dow reaching for 16k and Gold up 70 dollars in two days.
The worst part is there is nothing you can do about it.
This is a common idea and it is wrong for a very simple reason. Say the Fed sends you $10,000. You spend it. Those factories still here go on overtime for a couple of weeks. What happens after that? You have $10,000 worth of crap that you probably didn't need in the first place and now it is likely those goods will be liquidated at a lower price than they cost as you need more money due to suddenly inflated prices of basic necessities. Now the factories go on layoff.Too bad the Fed can't send stacks of cash to people in the mail. That might actually spur demand rather than giving 0% loans to people that don't need it and gamble it on commodities.
Loans to create small businesses would be better.This is a common idea and it is wrong for a very simple reason. Say the Fed sends you $10,000. You spend it. Those factories still here go on overtime for a couple of weeks. What happens after that? You have $10,000 worth of crap that you probably didn't need in the first place and now it is likely those goods will be liquidated at a lower price than they cost as you need more money due to suddenly inflated prices of basic necessities. Now the factories go on layoff.
The virtue of capitalism is that it creates wealth. No government or central banker can create wealth. They are in the Wizard of Oz business and that ends the same, regardless of which direction they attempt to move demand in. If printing money worked, then Argentina and Zimbabwe would be the wealthiest countries on Earth. To the contrary, the only reason Argentina has experienced an illusory and temporary success is because they have COUNTRIES LIKE THE USA TO ABSORB THEIR EXPORTS. Absent that they would be (and will be), completely fucked.
Oh, and those loans you mention are being gambled primarily on equities and real estate. The only commodity that is abnormally high is oil and that has everything to do with supply/demand issues rather than speculation. That and oil producers are becoming increasingly uneasy with the Bernanke printing press.
LOL!!!Loans to create small businesses would be better.
Home prices continue to climbReal economic growth will not happen under this economically clueless president.
Bull markets end on good news, bear markets end on bad news. Furthermore, there is technical evidence to suggest that the stock market has topped and that the mini-echo housing bubble has also topped. Unemployment figures can change rapidly when markets roll over. As for deficits, the total debt to GDP ratio is at historically unprecedented levels: there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that this is sustainable. I repeat: not a chance.Home prices continue to climb
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/09/03/home-prices-july/2756633/
S&P 500, Dow close at record highs
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2013/09/18/stocks-sp500-record-high/2830409/
Deficit Already Cut In Half
http://www.ohio.com/blogs/mass-destruction/blog-of-mass-destruction-1.298992/deficit-already-cut-in-half-1.389063
Jobless Rate Edges Down to Its Lowest Level in 4 Years
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/08/business/economy/us-creates-146000-new-jobs-as-unemployment-rate-falls-to-7-7.html?_r=0
the annual debt to GDP ratio is normal. it has been much worse.Bull markets end on good news, bear markets end on bad news. Furthermore, there is technical evidence to suggest that the stock market has topped and that the mini-echo housing bubble has also topped. Unemployment figures can change rapidly when markets roll over. As for deficits, the total debt to GDP ratio is at historically unprecedented levels: there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that this is sustainable. I repeat: not a chance.
That being said, the president has nothing whatsoever to do with any of it. Presidents are controlled by events. The economic events occurring are cyclical and have been building for decades.
Comparing Japans econ to our is retarted you dolt Buck. Apples and Oranges there Obamathe annual debt to GDP ratio is normal. it has been much worse.
we'll see about your predictions of a second housing bubble, to me it sounds kinda retarded. no offense.*
a lot of the other stuff you said is true enough, but tell japan that our debt to GDP ratio is unsustainable. they'll laugh while they continue to enjoy their high standard of living and their very sustainable, efficient, universal healthcare program.