abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
The promises are shared sacrifice, everyone covered, 1st step to universal healthcare....
I've states several times the promises don't match the reality. How in the world do you make the leap that I'm calling the actual law socialist?
I'd much rather keep the debate civil if you don't mind, but I can play either way.
Now who is playing word games? No, you will not get off blaming socialism for Romneycare. The promise and vision are not socialist. They are not utopian communist, they are not found in the prophecies of Marx. You are trying all you can to call the origin of the concept behind Obamacare socialist. Then you think you can excuse yourself from having to premise such an assertion by divorcing the concept behind the act from the act itself. This is exactly what you accused me of with a purely semantic argument. You can't wiggle out of the fact that Obamacare has absolutely no resemblance of anything socialist.
The promise you allude to:
Which is the fact that it is called "affordable care act" is yet again not an appeal to any socialist notion but capitalist. The government wants to make sure people buy private medicine from private companies and private insurance from private insurance companies. He is ordering us to be customers for a private industry. Don't even fucking imply that is socialist, not even in its core concept.The promises are shared sacrifice, everyone covered, 1st step to universal healthcare.