Search results

Sure. I'll talk to @robincnn about it.

Could buy 3 Lambos for the same price as the whole line...... So yeah lol.

Single gantry version of the machine we are buying. Ours will have 2 beams and 2 heads. The head in the video is 16 nozzle so each move is 16 placements.

Yes, we will be making more 120/132s. Samsung has secured our supply chain of LEDs and we will have our line installed in 4-6 weeks. Maybe even sooner. Once we have that our stock issues should be a thing of the past.

More than likely yes. Once our line is in we will change quite a bit over. S7 561C will eventually happen as well.

The numbers I was originally talking about where from test data directly from Samsung themselves. Unfortunately, we can't share internal stuff but the future is bright(Pun Intended). As I have stated our price for the QB288 will be the same with V2 using 301B.

Of course. Running them at the same current/wattage and running half as many leds for the same output would actually be impossible. The 301b would need to be around 115% efficient to do that. Generally there are a couple of ways to increase efficiency. Better leds (lm301b) or reduce the...

I'm comparing the total lumens per watt and output. I think you are missing the point I was making. To get the same efficiency you would need a lot more 561C underdriven vs the 301B. Also look at total power draw at the same current. The VF is lower on 301b so match total power instead of current.

That means there will be more photons at a given lumen count. Looks like 161 vs 288. Ok, sure not 144 vs 288. Pretty close and with the difference in the spectrum, it's gonna be really close to half.

Also, notice the difference in the spectrum... LM301B has a new advanced phosphorous technique. It isn't all mixed together like in earlier generations. AS you can see the 561C has more 555nm(lumen sensitivity peak) compared to the 301B

Use AZ VF bin ..... Less than 1% yield on AY voltage bin.... It's not orderable. Also, Ts of 25C is really only gonna be 1 minute tops even in an active cooling situation. As I've said above as temp goes up that is where LM301B pulls ahead. The serpentine cathode/anode really helps the heat...

As temp goes up (25C is not realistic in most cases) the LM301B pulls ahead. We generally don't talk in 25C flash measurement but real-world performance. Notice the .1C difference in Tj @ 25C. At 55-60C case temp, the difference is quite a bit more.

That's true. It can damage the originators brand....Especially if they even put our the Originators name on it(which has happened in the past).

We will see but I can see a pretty good difference.

Just an FYI we met with the Korean engineers from Samsung Wednesday. 561Y is missing quite a few components inside and they told us they are around S4 flux bin due to the removal of the internal reflector that directs the blue light into the phosphor. It was made to compete with 2835 LEDs which...

LER/QER is different so lumens doesn't tell it all. Also, it has to do with thermals as well. LM301B has a much better system to get the heat off the die much quicker. We will not be charging any more for them either.

Strangely enough we've been talking with Samsung directly over 1.5 yrs. The reds all started because of our advice lol. We just left Lfi in Chicago. Interesting things coming later this year and in 2019 from Samsung for Horticulture.....Unfortunately we can't talk about it right now but a press...

@robincnn

Yes it is... We are getting our own SMT line. It should be installed hopefully mid June. We will start a poll or 2 and see what people would like to see next. We will be adding monos at some point. New machine will keep up with demand for a while as well... Samsung is going to keep us in stock...

Not yet but in the near future, I think so.