Search results

ROFLMAO!! LOL LOL! (sigh) Rmoney doesn't work for us, wah wah wah. I'm so mad right now because wah wah wah. The hipocrisy is making me cry right now, I'm getting so stressed because my favourite candidate is losing because he's lying his ass off every chance he gets. Feel sorry for me please...

Welcome to the party :weed:

I see I mistook you for being a rational person. What a lovely way to lose all credibility in one post. I mean I was taking your side on this and you just flipped the script huh? Are you having a bad day or what? People who smoke good weed don't need to resort to that kind of pent up anger...

I think you mistook Canna (just like the freedomguy) for being people who believe in the value of facts. These guys don't care about reality. They just write whatever they want to provoke a reaction. Most of the time I get a good laugh out of reading their ignorant statements but it's also...

Oh and btw, here's a little lesson for you in socialism and Hitler: Many conservatives insist that the Nazis were an example of a 'socialist' government as part of their effort to discredit socialism and leftist policies in general. This is rather like using the example of East Germany, the...

Hehe yeah a guy who's got 1000+ posts filled with inane nonsense and nonsensical theories based on misunderstandings of phrases, history and facts grows better weed than me. Of course you must be correct. I can't see how you could possibly be wrong :lol: Good laugh.

Tbh we don't know if this freedom guy is even a stoner. His account is about 1 month old and all he's done is post baseless information, in the politics section, without any use of reason, rationale or logic. He doesn't have any credibility so I wouldn't worry too much about him if I were you...

The most funny thing about that image is that is was not even during the pledge of allegiance (which is the one where you guys hold your hands on your heart if I'm not mistaken), so he's butthurt for nothing and his "argument" is useless.

To people with a brain it goes: Gary Johnson > Obama > Rmoney. Especially if you're a member of a forum like this. To those who don't even understand the meaning of the word socialism and are ignorant on a whole other bunch of issues and phrases it's probably more like: God > Jesus > Rmoney.

It must really suck to lose. http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map You can't deny the numbers, even winning all tossup states Rmoney would still lose lol. I mean, you don't even know what socialism really is. You are blending isms because you don't know any...

Aren't there hand recounting measures? Like in a credible democratic election.

First of all, I didn't write the information, statistical analysts did. And to say it's simply a "4% lead in polls" is oversimplifying and wrong. It's just as much about the fact that not even winning all tossup states could make Rmoney win lol. You have to admit that is pretty funny...

Doesn't seem like there's anything to worry about anymore: http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map (updates as of today).

And it seems like the case is pretty certain by now: http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map NC went back to toss up and Ohio is looking more and more Obama by each day. Even without winning any swing states now, Obama has got 270 votes.

The information comes from Rasmussen, Reuters, PPP etc. I don't follow your train of thought. How are they untrustworthy? You are pulling at straws. It's a wide collection of 22 different polls from different sources. Obama led 19 out of 22 (2 tie and Romney only led in one).

No no, read please. Read the words. There's an 83.7% chance of him winning. Not a 83.7% v 16.3% win 'rate'.

Spot on mate.

I get the jist, I'm done arguing with these ignorant morons. And I don't use that word very often, but these guys really are morons, there is no other word for their behavior. It takes a special kind of stupid to be this biased and ignorant that even when facts are presented right infront of...

Impressive, 4 biased blogs and not one credible news source. That'll convince everybody. Oh and that sure is 'everyone else'. Random biased sites really represent the whole society :lol:

Wow your ignorance and stupidity amazes me. The study is posted in a .pdf which is working perfectly fine, I've tried on OSX & Windows 7 Ultimate on different browsers, works fine. Either you are trying to be "funny" by trolling and behaving like a child or you really are so stupid you can't...