Search results

Let's see. A random forum guy says landslie Rmoney. A leading statistician says: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/author/nate-silver/ (90.9% chance of Obama winning).

Look at the title of this thread, read the first post. This thread is about CHANCE of winning. No matter how much your delusional mind might try to make this about having electoral votes it'll never be true. You guys are out so deep you are trying to change the topic of a thread because it...

Here you go again. We are in a thread which has a subject matter of "Obama 91.4% win" and the discussion from the first page was about Obamas CHANCE of winning. But here you come and try to change a fact which is readily available in the damn title. The subject matter was NOT electoral votes...

I can't believe you are so stubborn. What I wrote still stands. I said that the percentages value the chance of winning based on electoral votes. That means the "odds of winning" or whatever other synonym you choose to use. I have made it clear and Samwell has made it clear. I did not...

Yes they do. And it can contaminate the strain. But it's highly unlikely that it'll happen on a large scale since most contaminated plants/seeds would be discarded by the grower. As long as people, continue to grow "pure (includes Indica / Sativa hybrids of course)" marijuana strains and...

Look I'll explain what happened to you, because it seems like you don't get it. I posted this: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ It's Nate Silvers blog. He has calculated the CHANCE of Obama winning the election by looking at polls, early voting and a lot of other variables. If you...

How is it a big ego to say that I can read and understand a blog by a famous statistician? All I've done is look at the facts and go with the most credible person (Nate Silver). Ok first of all, Nate Silver was not working for the NYT last time around. He was picked up by them because he was so...

Half the morning? I wrote 2 posts.. It took me about 7 minutes. Oh and btw it's not morning here.

I'm not from the UK, trust me I know of their problems. I don't even like going to London anymore.

What an interesting and well thought out statement. Kudos on the massive amount of intellect you had to use. Maybe it's because I'm intelligent and don't want to see the world burn just because you have a fixation with power? Long live the arrogance of your people.

I care because it will affect my life. It will affect a lot of peoples lives. And if it's possible to win the nomination to President of the US by being ignorant and ignoring facts then the whole world has a huge problem on our hands. What happens in your country sadly has an effect on the...

Look, you said that I said that Obama would win 90% of the electoral votes. That's what you wrote. I never said anything like that. And I called you out on it. Yet still here you are, saying you don't lie. Can it be more clear than it is right here? You fucking lied, own up to it. You lied...

I think you are quite butt hurt by the fact that most rational people don't any see it as a close race. It's basically over and has been for a few days now.

I have already attacked the issues and you guys just keep twisting and twisting the words I use. You lie about what I said, you completely change what I said and then call me an idiot for saying what I didn't say. I mean it's ridiculous. I can't trust anything you say when you just lie...

http://blog.paddypower.com/2012/11/04/paddy-power-pays-out-400000-on-obama-victory-in-u-s-presidential-election/

You made illogical and unnecessary threads in the politics forum :clap:

Wow.. And you said we wouldn't discuss the issues with you guys because we had no chance of winning the argument? This is what you wrote: I think you just proved how dumb a statement that was. I basically just tore down your entire illusion, I debated you straight up and all you had to say...

Lol dude I didn't give any credit to it, I discredited it. But if that is the case (you meant it to be a joke all along), then why didn't you just say so? You said that is proves libs are dumber than 6 year olds (I get the joke but with all the other insanely out of touch stuff you've written I...

I know the fucking polls can be wrong. But a 90%+ chance is still a 90%+ chance. And the fact that you brush it off because "Romney lead the polls once too" when it's not comparable in the same sense at all (Romney had a slight popular vote lead versus Obamas current huge chance lead (based on...

I know your society better than you do it seems. You don't even value people like Nate. I don't have to live in your country to read or to follow intelligent educated peoples deductions about what's happening in your country. All it takes is a visit here...