Search results

Sorry mate, IWW?

that old chestnut. we've all been on here long enough to recognise your (boring) repeated tactics. I usually ignore you...and will go back to doing so. You (and any of your cronies) can call it a meltdown as it will help you with the hurt. Everyone else can read and make up their own minds

I'm seriously interested in EQUALITY Dickheads are dickheads irrespective of race

Being a lefty, i used to make the mistake of blaming the (in many cases) blameless If you take a global view and get your head out of 'the west' perspective you'll find a common trait throughout history The haves control the have nots Everywhere

I'll wait

Show me which white man controls China please

So the whites you refer to...they weren't the elite then? Average white Joe from Europe was able to raise army, invade, change laws, oppress? Focus on race if you like but in doing so you miss the root cause...same then as it is now The elites make decisions...whatever colour their skin...

Thank you You call out people for being racist more than anyone else on here. You've just highlighted your ignorance on the subject. Thank you for proving my point

1% of the global population own over 50% of the global wealth. That 1% is made up of all races! The fight shouldn't be race based, but, in a world of divide and conquer, the focus on race is most useful

"the whites" not the elites? Even racism isn't black and white

As for calling everyone a 'racist' I'm affraid that's the go to default insult around these parts for some. Indicative of how conditioned we've become...i mean, I'm not a fan of it to be honest but i know some decent people who, unfortunately, happen to be racist. They are entitled to those...

Interesting opinion. Small point...didn't mathematics and advances in medicine reach 'the west' via Spain, brought from the middle east? Ahhh....you say "last 500 years" as you were bongsmiliebongsmilie

Sort of fair...but the people make decisions based on information and that information is controlled/spun. So fair...but harsh also

If your opinion that "i think they just want to prevent assad from using chemical weapons or any other international condemned methods." was correct then the cia wouldn't have been in Syria since 2006 trying to stir up discontent, arming and funding the 'rebels' (yes, that includes Isis)...

It's true. That said, there are other factors other than violence that keeps us there. We can afford to ditch the violence and continue to evolve...or at least that's what i hold on to... otherwise it depresses the fuck out of me

If the leaders in North Korea profit from their military, they still profit from it. Communist/Capitalist...it matters not. NO ONE should profit from war (ideally) I'm not a big fan of capitalism but that's not a factor. To answer your question, i believe a nation that didn't profit from war...

I may be misunderstanding this, if so, please elaborate.. are you suggesting that those who believe in 'conspiracy theories' do so as they judge others by their own (devious) standards? I read it as such and disagree strongly...but i may have misinterpreted your opinion

A very interesting debate chaps :) I'm the wrong side of the pond to offer an opinion of the nuances of your political parties, and I'm still non the wiser, but (on the whole)well debated and informative. I have strong opinions on equality...and how the lack of equality within society can't be...

You don't just "grab them by the pussy" :roll:

My starting point would be the arms industry. Non profit. After that it gets trickier but the likes of halliburton having ex board members in public office when our countries go into Iraq then getting big fat contracts once the shooting stops should be outlawed.