I've been growing with LED's since 2015. Along the way I've tried Cmh and SHPS too. My first LEDs were California Light Works Solar Storm 440's, the 550's and their cobs too. Okay results, but always lacking density, frost was okay and yield average. On to cmh, good quality and yield when using two 315's with Phillips 3100k bulbs.
Shps with 600 watt, 2k hortilux bulb. Better buds and yields. However, heat management (non-tent) 12x12 area required fan for bulb cooling. Didn't care for that. Switched to Timber cobs. Now have a Fatty VS with 900 watts and 1750k, 3k and 4k cobs. Averages out to a 2525 color spectrum with a HPS profile. I've added two Solar cure uva/b fixtures to that as well. That light is a beast. Excellent quality and yield. During cooler weather I run that with a 4 bucket RDWC system. I run Mephisto or Fastbuds autos under it and average about 8oz per plant in about 12 weeks.
All that being said, I'm starting two photos and plan to run them under two 315 cmh's 3100k.
These will be done in ProMix hp with light nutrients and microbes.
I'm delving into quantum boards with the Timber Magnolia. I plan on trying some autos with that and the RDWC set-up.
My story is one of lots of experimentation. In summary, early LED's I'd rank last. Hps and Cmh are about a tie. The Timber Fatty Cob with the uv supplement is the most consistent. It produces weight and quality and is easy to work with. (See buildasoil results using timbers on you tube). I'm still experimenting with the Magnolia. I have one grow under it that produced decent results. However, next time I plan to use better genetics and stick with Promix hp for non hydro grows.
So, as we all know it's more than just light. However, my experience with older LED technology kept me searching for alternatives. Granted, I was also gaining more experience as a grower. So, I can't just attribute better results to better lights. It's all tied together.