Yessica...
Well-Known Member
Re. Lax.
People are shaped by their upbringing. By their experiences.
There MUST be a reason he thinks this.
Aren't you interested to hear the reason?
I am.
60 Academics in economics and beyond support Sanders' economic plan over Clinton's
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
People are shaped by their upbringing. By their experiences.
There MUST be a reason he thinks this.
Aren't you interested to hear the reason?
I am.
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
Self loathing?
Yessica...
Well-Known Member
Meany.
I'll give you kids a shiny nickel if you can get through 5 posts each without personally attacking each other.
And GO!
Hahah
Can you do it? I believe in you...
bravedave
Well-Known Member
Actually, unlike your easy backhand, the @red w. blue analogy was brilliant. It is also true. Knowing Sanders's outline is certainly enough to discount further inquiry. Add to that the fact that his only chance requires an indictment that will probably not happen in spite of 150 FBI agents discovering crimes daily.
Would you like to argue/discuss the finer points of the John Kasich platform? Yeah, me neither.
You obviously can't read well or have comprehension issues..I said HIS platform..not some twisted version of what RobRoy 'thinks' Sanders supporters think.
That's what gets you into trouble Rob..
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
pnwmystery
Well-Known Member
The @red w. blue analogy was idiotic. Nazis are not socialists, they're on the other end of the political spectrum.
pnwmystery
Well-Known Member
The @red w. blue analogy was idiotic. Nazis are not socialists, they're on the other end of the political spectrum.
Queue: Then why is it called National Socialism, huh? From just about everyone who doesn't understand National Socialism and Socialist thought.
bravedave
Well-Known Member
The "analogy" post did not mention Nazi's. The clue should have been easily discernable from what I wrote. You didn't perform well on your ACTs, did you?
Regardless, you should read Jonah Goldberg's book, "Liberal Fascism". You know, if you read books. The brand of socialism you and yours subscibe to is documented there. Making also the Nazi comparison understandable.
Last edited:
pnwmystery
Well-Known Member
I actually performed very well on my ACTs, thank you. I guess you failed the rhetoric part though.
Lol if you think Jonah Goldberg is a good writer and put forth a good argument in Liberal Fascism you're pretty delusional.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
The left side of Bernies mouth needs to get in step with the right side of his mouth and his voting record.
Bernie is another charlatan in a long line of charlatans. He SAYS he's against big banks and then does what? He votes to extend the debt limit. Where will that increased spending / debt money come from? A Big bank. Derp dee durr.
bravedave
Well-Known Member
Friend, you trashed me in two posts because you mistakenly thought I was responding to something I didn't. "Idiotic" was the term you tried to hammer home. I would think an "Oops. Sorry Dave. I get it now,", would have been a nice followup from you. "I" am sorry for using the ACT reference as I don't think you understood it.
And, "rhetoric part"?
We are even, I guess. Because you lost me. What are you deflecting to?
Personally, I am not a big fan Goldberg either. More a personae thing though as he generally is knowledgeable in the topics he covers. It is a good book. You would not like it, but you would have a hard time discounting the similarities it points to
pnwmystery
Well-Known Member
No, I didn't trash you in the initial post. I said red w. blue's comparison was idiotic. Not you, not him, because I thought you were referencing him asking jim why he supports Nazi/socialists. When someone says "Nazis/socialists" the / usually replaces a hyphen or en dash to join a pair of words. Rhetoric is part of the English portion on the ACT iirc - I was simply firing back with you saying "You must've done poor on your ACTs," which was backhanded way to say "You misunderstood." I've actually skimmed through it, it was pretty dismal.
bravedave
Well-Known Member
My ACT was quite some time ago, but I would bet it didn't have a rhetoric section. I was leaning towards other areas. Those that tested your ability to recognize patterns and the ability to actually follow a thread. You didn't skim shit. Oh. Maybe today.
I
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Sooooooooo back to Mr Sanders' economic plan for a moment, what do you think the consequences of its enaction would be? What are the chances?
Personally, I believe this first go round will fail. It's going to have to get worse before people will realize who's been screwing them all this time.
I'm working as hard as I can for an alternative outcome but there are lots of people out there who will shoot themselves in the foot to prove a point.
Personally, I believe this first go round will fail. It's going to have to get worse before people will realize who's been screwing them all this time.
I'm working as hard as I can for an alternative outcome but there are lots of people out there who will shoot themselves in the foot to prove a point.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Actually there are lots of people out there who will shoot you, if you think your economic choices are yours. Nanny Stater Bernie is one of them.
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
He tweets that he can't comprehend why student loans have higher interest rates than home loans. If he can't comprehend basic economics and the meaning of collateral, then he has no place influencing the U.S. economy.
Last edited:
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Often the brand of "ism" is a distraction. They all rely on the same means to enforce their edicts, which is the reason none of them work. They all think they and not you should run your own life. You can't refute that.
Corso312
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
It's always amusing (and a little frightening) when people disagree with themselves or in Sky's case endorse a candidate that does that.
Bernie against big banks...votes to extend the debt limit.
Bernie, "Mr. peace".....votes multiple times to fund the military industrial complex.
