wait, which part of that wasnt true?
read the title of this thread lol. i tried dyna gro. your pretty much saying all nutes are the same just buy the cheapest ones i disagree with that. bud candy isnt the same as carbo load its carbo load and sweatleaf combined. i made a good point about the additives being easy to use and you never responded. would you at least agree with that or no? wouldnt you also agree that AN carries everything pretty much? seems like your trying to say nothing good on purpose
thats not what im essentially saying, just that you could get some of the same elements from that of a cheap nutrient, hell take jacks classic. look up grows with jacks, they turn out great. and its all the same shit, just sucrose dextrose and sugars. do you use superthrive?
I'd ask you do do your own Connoisseur grow in hydro (like I did and so did phil and both our plants sucked) but we all know hydro was too complicated for you
. I'm doing the comparison at another forum. As you can see, comparison grows are lost on people here because they simply don't understand the mineral composition of their plant foods and why some would do well or do horribly in certain situations.
how is it all the same shit when my plants were a third smaller when i used dyna gro plus it has 16 elements? no disrespect but i think you might be too high to have this conversation. its like im saying the same stuff over and over
hahahahahaha my bad if i seem a bit confused, what nutes were you using from dyna? i see plenty of people on here using dyna and getting great results.
you gotta read the thread. great results compared to what? i didnt get great results at all. a few people in this thread also agreed with me and said veg growth with dyna gro is slow
shit, well if dyna didnt work for you then i guess run with AN for now since you do well with it. are you sure you were feeding them enough?
yes. alright im outta here
you are fucking awesome crazy. i wish i could spaghetti the shit out of you. lol. you are always fun to talk to and you always keep the conversation logical and intelligent. why can't others be like that. this is my problem with homebrewer. he thinks he's the only one that knows cannibus and that anyone else that disagrees with him is wrong. tree proved that; homebrewer got clowned on the icmag thread trying to act like a know it all saying the same bs lines he uses here and trying to use the same internet "college" articles he dumps all over the threads. phillip proved it by showing buds that were WAY better looking than homebrewers; so what did HB do? he tried to claim they were grown wrong. Lordjin proved it too. his buds were SICK!! so how is ith they can grow top quality buds and homebrewer can't? i'd rather take advice from someone who has proven they can grow quality with any nutrient. isn't that what you are saying? anything will grow cannibus as long as you know how to use it and read your plants? those guys obviously did it and when homebrewer couldn't. that's my only point. i trust their judgement more than his. in my opinion anyone that just tries to talk down to people and insult them cause they don't agree with him is a fraud. that's all homebrewer ever does.
all i can say is come on here with an open mind,
hit me up for sure man. i'd love to see anything you got running.
do your thing you dont even need to ask. the more pics the better
i will for sure. and sweet, glad i subbed to that journal.
Look at the composition of the nitrogen in the different formulas you've used, there lies your answer. Nitrate nitrogen and urea are fast acting which is what AN uses. DG uses 2/3rds nitrate, 1/3 amoniacal nitrogen. In this H&G test grow, I'm seeing 'taller plants' because they use almost all nitrate nitrogen, just like AN and GH. What you're missing is that yield doesn't come from height, it comes from the nodes and given how fast light falls off as it moves away from it's source, you don't want 'taller plants', you want shorter plants with a lot of nodes. I'm 50 days away from harvesting these H&G aqua flakes ladies and other than pH stability, concentration levels, and the height of the plants, 10 days of using Aqua flakes says nothing about the quality (or lack thereof) of this plant food.
This is nug talking to me in the thread below...now we might be getting somewhere i can respect that post homebrewer. i knew i was on to something! the only thing is i highly disagree with you when you say yield doesn't come from height. unless your plants are a certain height than they have a max on the yield. like i said in a previous post no way in hell my 2 ft plants are gonna yield as much as 3 ft ones im sticking with that. i also noticed leaves just looked more alive when i switched back to the 2 part but thats a different subject. homebrewer now isnt this a better conversation than insulting me? i think you owe me an apology i was right the whole time about dg plants being alot shorterLook at the composition of the nitrogen in the different formulas you've used, there lies your answer. Nitrate nitrogen and urea are fast acting which is what AN uses. DG uses 2/3rds nitrate, 1/3 amoniacal nitrogen. In this H&G test grow, I'm seeing 'taller plants' because they use almost all nitrate nitrogen, just like AN and GH. What you're missing is that yield doesn't come from height, it comes from the nodes and given how fast light falls off as it moves away from it's source, you don't want 'taller plants', you want shorter plants with a lot of nodes. I'm 50 days away from harvesting these H&G aqua flakes ladies and other than pH stability, concentration levels, and the height of the plants, 10 days of using Aqua flakes says nothing about the quality (or lack thereof) of this plant food.
I also want to post this because haters always going to hate...is that appropriate here?
Thread found here: https://www.rollitup.org/nutrients/523081-superthrive.html
I am so sorry...truly...hope it gets better for you...
thank you! i appreciate that. all i was tryin to do was look for the best nutes when i tried dyna i was never trying to bash them