psychadelibud
Well-Known Member
True, but not the case with Florel... The finished product using Florel is nothing at all like paclo and others in that category... They look normal, 100% free of toxins and the buds look identical and carry the same terps, potency as they would normally grown. Honestly, I've used florel before many of times and I think the lack of stretch contributes to correct feeding rates, correct timing, agitating the plants and training and a small percentage of results likely go to florel as it simply kicks the plants into flowering mode faster than without it.
AKBB told me he had a crop once that he kept the fan on high, directly on the plants. He said it did not stretch at all. Which would go along in the same category of plant agitation. It's been proven to work but I never see reports of any growers doing it. Also, I was recommended to initiate flowering at 14 off/ 10 on for the first week, then switch over to 12/12... Also used bud ignitor, which is known to work well if used correctly, topped only 4 days before flip (which I wish I didn't do).. their's so many variables that come into play, Florel only contributed to a small amount of that. If Florel was as effective at the same rate paclo is, all the big commercial growers would be using it instead... since it does not carry over to the harvested flower, cheaper and does not carry much risk in damaging the plants... Its basically the same thing as the old Dutch Master Reverse and the newer product called Optic Foliar Switch.
Last edited:
So ready for harvest time already!!!
