Another derailed oil hauling train...

I don't watch Cable TV news, I don't watch Television. Its probably been 12 years since I watched anything from FOX. ABC, CBS. I watch some Young Turks, Rachel Madcow even. Whatever seems to catch my eye on the net. Not Tellalievision.

So now that all of your assumptions have been smashed against the rocks of reality, how many people do you think there are that are just like me?
Are you denying the fact that older people watch cable network news more than younger people?

After all, the point about Fox News was to gloat about their ratings, right? You know the internet numbers crush all cable news network numbers combined, right?
 
Are you denying the fact that older people watch cable network news more than younger people?
No, there you go making assumptions again. I made that post to correct the last assumption you made, which was that I was old and got all my news from Cable TV.

After all, the point about Fox News was to gloat about their ratings, right? No. There you go making another assumption.
The point was to show that Buck's comment that Rachel Madcow is the best journalist on TV was BS. If she were the best she wouldn't have 1/3rd the viewers.

You know the internet numbers crush all cable news network numbers combined, right?

By unique visitors they might, but hard to tell if people who go to those news sites are reading all the content or just what interests them.

Even by that standard though, More people getting their internet news from FOX than any of the other TV networks except CNN.
 
Last edited:
How bout cause older conservatives have more time to sit at home and watch T.V, their network of choice is FOXnews. While everyone else is working or going to school, they watch FOX, of course the numbers are gonna be skewed, the laziest fucks in the country are conservatives, they take up most of the T.V watching throughout the day..

and if you can't get to the TV..for sure you can AM radio Power Hours 9-12..Beck, Rush and someone else..i was in the car of a CPA and this is the shit he had on.
 
By unique visitors they might, but hard to tell if people who go to those news sites are reading all the content or just what interests them.

Even by that standard though, More people getting their internet news from FOX than any of the other TV networks except CNN.
By people you mean "Americans aged 2 or older"? I am scratching my head figuring out how the hell they are polling two-year olds to find out if they watch news. O_o
 
By people you mean "Americans aged 2 or older"? I am scratching my head figuring out how the hell they are polling two-year olds to find out if they watch news. o_O
Right.
Who says it has to even be people? Could be one of the millions of spiders that crawl all over for the search engines. Just because a web page registers 1 million unique visitors, it in no way means it has 1 million people reading everything on that site and agreeing with it. Just like a web page dedicated to nuclear bombs that has 10 million unique visitors doesn't mean we have 10 million rogue nukes out there.
 
you're an idiot!

i meant big into AM radio, red state..good god man!

What part of "It was a lunch meeting in Dallas, they're big into that." references radio?

Pretty sure that the subject of that sentence is lunch meeting, not radio.
Learn to English

Also Learn to see who the idiot is.
 
What part of "It was a lunch meeting in Dallas, they're big into that." references radio?

Pretty sure that the subject of that sentence is lunch meeting, not radio.
Learn to English

Also Learn to see who the idiot is.

here let me assist you..same post:

It was a lunch meeting in Dallas, they're big into that (sic radio) he did turn it off, was pretty embarrassed with Rush spewing hate.

so small minded..so very small minded..
 
here let me assist you..same post:

It was a lunch meeting in Dallas, they're big into that (sic radio) he did turn it off, was pretty embarrassed with Rush spewing hate.

so small minded..so very small minded..
No, sorry. You don't know how the English language works. The word "that" does not refer to "radio" if it did you would have written the word "Radio" because otherwise the reader has no idea that you are referring to the subject of an entirely different sentence. "that" refers to the lunch meeting. The word "it" refers to the radio, but that is an entirely different sentence.

Do you understand that you cannot refer to the subject of another sentence and actually expect people to understand that you didn't mean the sentence it refers to, but another sentence written an hour before?

Also, do you know what sic stands for? Sic erat scriptum or The way it was written. Do you understand the concept behind the sic term? Because you are using it wrong, very very wrong, in fact you are using it in the opposite way it actually works.

For example, if you wrote the sentence " I am going to jump ovur the moon." and then I went to publish that sentence in some article or whatever I would write the sentence as "I am going to jump ovur (sic) the moon." That shows the reader that YOU wrote the word "over" as "ovur" and mispelled it yourself and I am only quoting what you wrote verbatim AS IT IS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN.

You never wrote the word RADIO in the original so writing another sentence using sic just means you are totally ignorant about this subject.
 
Back
Top