Anyone else watching the Kyle Rittenhouse trial?

SFnone said:
Well I guess this means if you are out protesting, and see a magat carrying, best kill the hell out of that motherfucker, because they might shoot you, now feeling encouraged to do so. You gotta, it's self defense. This is like an okay to turn neighborhoods into all out war zones.
Click to expand...

It means don’t be a scumbag and attack people or be violent because they can legally defend themselves. We aren’t animals there is no reason for violence if two sides disagree. Even on the courthouse of this trial people disagree but they have civil discussion not mob violence
 
Applesauceisgood said:
I think everyone should own and become familiar with firearms. They are the great equalizer when unknown lunatics attack you or your family shouting man up and fight me, sissy. Plus they maintain value. Rights = use it or lose it, unfortunately.
Click to expand...

I do have to say my experience more often than not has been the dude with the gun talking shit and picking the fight. I see this case as the same scenario.

Tomatoe tomato or whatever
 
MisterKister said:
What's a guy like you? A wannabe tough guy/hero?
Click to expand...

Indeed - as someone who trains boxing + judo, I would never risk my life getting into a physical altercation with an unknown individual. All it takes is a flash KO or sucker punch and a concrete floor to leave you dead or drinking through a straw for life. These aren't the things we leave to chance and there is nothing masculine about it. I facepalmed when the prosecutors brought this up in closing. A nonsensical hailmary when you know the case has been lost.
 
Applesauceisgood said:
"Judge, I only raped the woman because her skirt was short and she provoked me" < a nonsensical argument just like the one you present. A violent mob burning buildings don't get to attack someone for putting out the fires they started.
Click to expand...
He was there to put out a fire? How did he put out the fire other than kill two people?
 
HGCC said:
I do have to say my experience more often than not has been the dude with the gun talking shit and picking the fight. I see this case as the same scenario.

Tomatoe tomato or whatever
Click to expand...

Talking shit is not physically attacking you. People can talk shit and do talk shit on both sides. It’s only when somebody gets stupid and physically attacks a person it becomes a problem
 
Applesauceisgood said:
Indeed - as someone who trains boxing + judo, I would never risk my life getting into a physical altercation with an unknown individual. All it takes is a flash KO or sucker punch and a concrete floor to leave you dead or drinking through a straw for life. These aren't the things we leave to chance and there is nothing masculine about it. I facepalmed when the prosecutors brought this up in closing. A nonsensical hailmary when you know the case has been lost.
Click to expand...
Why not increase your odds in a fight? Why not bring a semi-auto rifle with you?
 
HGCC said:
I do have to say my experience more often than not has been the dude with the gun talking shit and picking the fight. I see this case as the same scenario.

Tomatoe tomato or whatever
Click to expand...

I don't agree. I've lived in some of the most heavily armed states in the US and they also typically have the lowest incidents of violent crime. Legal gun owners, as a general rule, tend to be polite and mature. However, we are a country of 350 million people with assholes in every pocket. For example, Mr. Rosenbaum was the aggressive party. He was yelling threats and racial slurs towards multiple individuals.
 
printer said:
Why not increase your odds in a fight? Why not bring a semi-auto rifle with you?
Click to expand...

How much do you know about guns? The majority of firearms that aren't revolvers are semi-automatic including AR-15s and pistols. To your point, yes, ideally you are legally carrying a gun when someone attempts to do you harm.
 
MisterKister said:
Hahaha selfless heroes huh?? What kind of bullshit is that??
Click to expand...
My guess would be a sign being held by someone who is being micro targeted by right wing hate mongers cat fishing to trick people into carrying something to trigger the people beings scammed by the right wing trolls into snow flaking about people that the kid killed.

You know to make them feel all superior about cheering on someone who killed an unarmed 5'3 person who scared them with a plastic bag and words.
 
Applesauceisgood said:
I don't agree. I've lived in some of the most heavily armed states in the US and they also typically have the lowest incidents of violent crime. Legal gun owners, as a general rule, tend to be polite and mature. However, we are a country of 350 million people with assholes in every pocket. For example, Mr. Rosenbaum was the aggressive part. He was yelling threats and racial slurs towards multiple individuals.
Click to expand...
Fucking Texans am I right?
 
Of the 2 men killed, one was a convicted child molester, the other convicted of domestic violence. The third man wounded admits he pointed his pistol at Kyle before he was shot. These weren't saints out spreading the word of the Lord, they were punks looking for trouble while burning a city.
 
Applesauceisgood said:
How much do you know about guns? The majority of firearms that aren't revolvers are semi-automatic including AR-15s and pistols. To your point, yes, ideally you are legally carrying a gun when someone attempts to do you harm.
Click to expand...
I think you’re giving a bad break to bolt actions and various shotgun modes.
 
hanimmal said:
My guess would be a sign being held by someone who is being micro targeted by right wing hate mongers cat fishing to trick people into carrying something to trigger the people beings scammed by the right wing trolls into snow flaking about people that the kid killed.

You know to make them feel all superior about cheering on someone who killed an unarmed 5'3 person who scared them with a plastic bag and words.
Click to expand...


How the fuck is the Right being hate mongers?? The ONLY people that interject race into every issue is the left. It’s bullshit
 
Applesauceisgood said:
Mr. Rittenhouse didn't exhibit a weapon in a threatening way. For you, the act of carrying a firearm is a threat. Thankfully, we abide by the law and not your misguided view of the world.
Click to expand...
Just remember that when I show up to defend the capital wrapped in the flag my weapon isn’t a threat just my opportunity
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top