707humboldt
Well-Known Member
Sacrifice total yield and quality? Doesn't make any sense to me regardless if gpw is better.
Sacrifice total yield and quality? Doesn't make any sense to me regardless if gpw is better.
Find me one LED seller that lists efficiency on their advertisement. Find me one. Remember, efficiency is a unitless number between 0-1. They feed you all sorts of other BS numbers.. sure.., but if most of them told you their efficiency, nobody would ever buy them, because gavita's efficiency makes almost everything look like a joke. 42% is very high. The people getting 50% efficiency with DIY are underdriving to extreme levels, and using top flux bins, which means huge startup cost.. Most led units you can buy are actually lower than 30% efficiency, many lower than 15%..
Even the highest quality (most expensive) companies that use the highest quality leds don't list efficiency. The new area51 panels coming out soon are actually only going to have 40% efficiency. Do you think their ad will say "btw, gavita is 2% better efficiency than our latest and greatest Cob lamp?", because that's basically what's going on.
In order to find efficiency, you have to rip the SPD chart out of the individual cobs datasheets using a pixel reader to essentially count pixels, then do some calculus to find LER (luminous efficacy of radiation). Efficiency = luminous efficacy of source / LER . LER for the cxb 3000cri 80cri phosphor, for example, is 325lm/W, so if you get 150lm/W of that spectrum, for example, it's 150/325 = 46% efficiency. 325lm/W is what you'd get for a 100% efficient lamp with that spectral distribution (SPD). Notice how the units all cancel out.
It's pretty annoying to me because I'm a hydro guy, and now being an LED grower somehow makes me organic. I'm king chemical.He's refering to me in the rols thread church. Don't bother. I tried.
Well you're simply incorrect. I don't know what else I can say. Those lights are ridiculously bright.And I will say it again, I still doubt that even if he cranks it up or what ever, the yield is still not going to be that of a DE hps. No matter what led it is or who is growing it. Show me a led room that is getting 2+ per 4x4 area
Theres a reason everyone is using them, they are not just "ridiculously" bright. They work.Well you're simply incorrect. I don't know what else I can say. Those lights are ridiculously bright.
Oh now thats just not fair.......I love my T-5's....Meanwhile, the same people who are skeptical of LED rush out to replace their veg lamp with expensive T5HO setups. Out of the pot, into the frying pan.
Smash them.Oh now thats just not fair.......I love my T-5's....
My wife would kill me.Smash them.
hmm but you can flower under T5 and pull same if not better then LED lolMy cxb2530 3000k 80cri U2 bin at 500mA DIY build is ~2.4umol/J dissipation. It encompasses gavita's bubble.
I'm happy you can get good results with HPS. You can flower pot under 1000W of cfl. You won't get great results, but to each his own, right?
Thats a bad ass bud shot dude!!!!hmm but you can flower under T5 and pull same if not better then LED lol
Here 8 - 9 week veg under 48 watts T5 Ho sunblasters and some other ones 48 watt T5 HO in 5 gallon and getting ready for some full power Gavita;s and one picture of a friends T5 Ho harvest plants so really are the cobs stacking up looking at them thin stemed plants not really to me there STRETCHED TO FUCK
Ok, he specifically stated that he wanted to avoid temperature spikes and high electric bills, not save on start up costs.Then elaborate on why it's outdated.
And as for saving money...he specifically said he wanted to.
I know about leds as a whole(95%+ of them and what they can and can't do) ...you know some about cobs, veros sepcifically. My bubble encompasses yours. And my bubble also merges with hps and induction. As well as a few grow methods. Dare I call my bubble a world or planet...with many different lands/counties of expertise. Not just cobland and its' inhabitants.