OzCocoLoco
Well-Known Member
The plants might turn out hermaphrodite
The plants might turn out hermaphrodite
You shouldn't lose vigor after only one round of inbreeding but you'll lose any hybrid vigor that the original plant hadOnly its not an exact copy. There is usually a fair bit of variation in s1's and usually a lack of vigor as well because of the inbreeding.
It's just the way genetics work with dominant and recessive traits.Yeah tru would it be close tho? I’m still learning bout this breeding stuff, who give most traits usually pollen donor? Or recipient?
The punnett square was developed by Reginald C. Punnett and has been used in biology for a long time.It's just the way genetics work with dominant and recessive traits.
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/gregor-mendel-and-the-principles-of-inheritance-593
Mendal is the O.G of plant breeding he developed the punett square to track traits in his experiments
View attachment 4232750
Fuck I’m stressed out
Even a broken clock is right twice a day,lucky you were here stalking the threadThe punnett square was developed by Reginald C. Punnett and has been used in biology for a long time.
Yeah I just sharpened and lightened it up. The app is called camera+. It’s the sharpen feature that’s best for bringing out the trichs.How did u do that? Did u lighten it? Lol nah he approving I just put up his stoned look photo haha
Yeah that’s probs a bit too far lol. Gotta keep it real
Yeah nah you’re wrong there actually. A LOT of the pics last grow were flash ONLY. Those girls spoke for themselves.That's how venus does her day 28 frost photos
Neither do II don't use filters...
U almost took the hook....Yeah nah you’re wrong there actually. A LOT of the pics last grow were flash ONLY. Those girls spoke for themselves.
And like I even said to you, whether u edit or not you can’t create something that isn’t there.
Well actually I'd say u did take the hook ..but not the line and sinker lolYeah nah you’re wrong there actually. A LOT of the pics last grow were flash ONLY. Those girls spoke for themselves.
And like I even said to you, whether u edit or not you can’t create something that isn’t there.
I've been eating pineappleHahaha shithead!!
I swallowed it
Yeah no definitely. On pics where I was in a hurry dinner on table etc and the lighting wasn’t right to emphasise trichs then I’d brighten (or sometimes darken) and sharpen. That’s all I EVER do. The most important part of photography is lighting, followed by lighting, and after that is lighting.Well actually I'd say u did take the hook ..but not the line and sinker lol
But wait then I read back and you say a lot of pics were flash only..so that means some weren't?
And your right you can't create something that's not there but you can make it look a lot better or brighter etc can't you ?
Cheating would be, well, cheating. Enhancing features that already exist to capture in the correct lighting is not cheating g.So we can make plants look better by cheating with the photo editor is all I'm saying...
View attachment 4232780
We may as well ..last nite it was gigs today could be photography tomorrow could be rubes snorting bath salts ....Cheating would be, well, cheating. Enhancing features that already exist to capture in the correct lighting is not cheating g.
Anyway we’re not gonna do a couple of pages on photography now are we?